Biden says basic U.S. rights are at risk if Supreme Court draft decision stands

Advertisement

Advertise with us

WASHINGTON - Rescinding the constitutional right to an abortion would be just the beginning, President Joe Biden warned Tuesday as the world confronted anew the possibility that women in the United States are poised to lose the right to choose.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 03/05/2022 (1595 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

WASHINGTON – Rescinding the constitutional right to an abortion would be just the beginning, President Joe Biden warned Tuesday as the world confronted anew the possibility that women in the United States are poised to lose the right to choose.

Outside the U.S. Supreme Court, activists on both sides of the abortion debate gathered with equal parts dismay and delight, all of them reeling at the notion that Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 ruling, could soon be overturned.

“I remember sitting there stammering, going, ‘What?'” said Sonja Morin, an anti-abortion crusader from Massachusetts who happened to be in D.C. on Tuesday to take part in a separate protest.

A crowd of people gather outside the Supreme Court early Tuesday, May 3, 2022, in Washington. A draft opinion suggests the U.S. Supreme Court could be poised to overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade case that legalized abortion nationwide, according to a Politico report released Monday. Whatever the outcome, the Politico report represents an extremely rare breach of the court's secretive deliberation process, and on a case of surpassing importance. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
A crowd of people gather outside the Supreme Court early Tuesday, May 3, 2022, in Washington. A draft opinion suggests the U.S. Supreme Court could be poised to overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade case that legalized abortion nationwide, according to a Politico report released Monday. Whatever the outcome, the Politico report represents an extremely rare breach of the court's secretive deliberation process, and on a case of surpassing importance. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

“I just I couldn’t wrap my head around it,” said Morin, 19. “It’s an optimistic day that we’ve been waiting for for so long, but it’s crazy — and obviously, precedent-breaking that it comes so soon.”

On the other side of a narrow barricade, as Capitol police officers kept a wary eye from a distance, a larger crowd of abortion advocates were gathered, just as they had done the night before, shortly after Politico broke the explosive news.

Protesters, pressed for time, were sprawled on the sidewalk using Sharpies to hand-letter makeshift placards out of panels of torn cardboard. One used an old-school ink-and-stencil kit to churn out leaflets reading: My Body, My Choice.

By mid-morning, the high court had confirmed that the draft majority opinion obtained by Politico — penned in February by Justice Samuel Alito, who thoroughly rejects both the Roe decision and a 1992 ruling known as Planned Parenthood v. Casey — was authentic, but still far from final.

Should the core argument survive long enough for the court’s final ruling, it would give individual states the power to decide whether abortion should be legal. More than half are widely expected to move quickly to ban it; more than a dozen already have laws on the books that need only the Supreme Court’s blessing.

“Roe was egregiously wrong from the start. Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences,” Alito writes.

“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled.”

On the pro-abortion access side of Tuesday’s split-screen protests, Jamie Manson, president of Catholics for Choice, said she was more surprised by how the news emerged than by the conclusion the conservative court appears close to reaching.

“Shocking, because this doesn’t happen — I mean, leaks of drafts of Supreme Court decisions, what’s the story there — but not surprised, because we’ve been watching,” Manson said.

Chief Justice John Roberts said he had ordered an investigation into the leak, which he called an “egregious breach of trust.”

Along with Alito, the other four Republican-appointed justices — Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch — all voted in favour, Politico said, citing an anonymous source.

It’s not clear whether Roberts will support the Alito opinion, side with any of other three Democrat appointees or write his own dissent.

“We know we have five radically anti-choice, Catholic justices on the Supreme Court, so I’m not surprised,” Manson said.

“But my hope is that this is a wake-up call for people … I’m hoping this wakes people up to say, ‘This is real. And this is happening in the United States of America.'”

Polls have consistently indicated that fewer than one-third of Americans support striking down Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decision that has served as both a bedrock precedent for the courts and a lodestar for reproductive rights champions for the last 49 years.

More evidence emerged Tuesday when the Washington Post released a new survey, conducted last week with ABC News, that found 28 per cent of respondents believe the decision should be overturned, compared with 54 per cent who want it upheld.

That divide may go a long way toward explaining the motives behind the leak, particularly with midterm elections coming up in November that are widely expected to be a punishing comeuppance for Democrats.

“The integrity and independence of the Supreme Court is once again under attack,” said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, the Republican from Kentucky.

“I hope that the leaker, who is extremely likely to be found given the limited number of people who have the ability to access early drafts of opinions, will be dealt with as severely as the law may allow.”

Biden himself wasted little time Tuesday telling Americans that the stakes are high — and that they will have the power to protect hard-fought rights if they turn out in droves this fall to send Democrats to Capitol Hill.

“It would mean that every other decision relating to the notion of privacy is thrown into question,” Biden said as he left the White House for a trip to Alabama. Issues like same-sex marriage and contraception could come under pressure based on the rationale spelled out in the draft decision, he warned.

“If the court does overturn Roe, it will fall on our nation’s elected officials at all levels of government to protect a woman’s right to choose,” the president said in a separate written statement.

“And it will fall on voters to elect pro-choice officials this November.”

Biden also signalled a willingness to sign into law a bill that would codify abortion rights, although that would be impossible without control of Congress. The Democrats are widely expected to lose that control before next year.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, the progressive firebrand from Massachusetts who challenged Biden for the Democratic nomination for president in 2020, struggled to contain her frustration Tuesday in an interview with CNN.

To varying degrees, four of the five Republican appointees on the court indicated during their confirmation hearings that they would respect the precedent established by Roe v. Wade, Warren said.

“Look, I feel really angry about this,” she said. “What I feel angry about is that an extremist Supreme Court is going to impose their views on the rest of America.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 3, 2022.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Tory health critic ‘disappointed’ after being rebuffed by health officials

Carol Sanders 4 minute read Preview

Tory health critic ‘disappointed’ after being rebuffed by health officials

Carol Sanders 4 minute read Saturday, Sep. 12, 2026

The health critic for the Progressive Conservative party says her ability to get information about the accelerated reopening of Dauphin’s emergency department was stymied by Prairie Mountain Health officials because they refused to meet with her.

“I wanted to meet with PMH staff to discuss the status of the facility and the challenges they’re facing and getting services back online,” Kathleen Cook said Friday.

“I was very disappointed that Prairie Mountain Health declined me that opportunity.”

Cook said she asked for a meeting a few days after the Sept. 7 reopening of a temporary ER at the hospital, that was severely damaged by flooding.

Read
Saturday, Sep. 12, 2026

Finding fulfilment as canines’ companion

AV Kitching 9 minute read Preview

Finding fulfilment as canines’ companion

AV Kitching 9 minute read 6:00 AM CDT

Tim Campbell loves dogs. He loves them so much that as soon he retired from his job at Panasonic Canada in early 2024 he began volunteering in earnest at the Winnipeg Humane Society (WHS).

He’d started his voluntary career five years prior with another local dog rescue organization. The work was rewarding, he says but the call-outs were unpredictable.

He was looking for a voluntary role which had a bit more structure to it, something he could build a routine around, while spending time with the animals he truly adores.

“In the summer, I’m there two mornings a week, and when the weather turns a little colder, I’m there anywhere from three to four mornings, depending on what’s going on,” Campbell, 59, explains.

Read
6:00 AM CDT

SCOTUS draft suggests basic rights in peril: Biden

James McCarten, The Canadian Press 6 minute read Preview

SCOTUS draft suggests basic rights in peril: Biden

James McCarten, The Canadian Press 6 minute read Tuesday, May. 3, 2022

WASHINGTON - Rescinding the constitutional right to an abortion would be just the beginning, President Joe Biden warned Tuesday as the world confronted anew the possibility that women in the United States are poised to lose the right to choose.

Outside the U.S. Supreme Court, activists on both sides of the abortion debate gathered with equal parts dismay and delight, all of them reeling at the notion that Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 ruling, could soon be overturned.

"I remember sitting there stammering, going, 'What?'" said Sonja Morin, an anti-abortion crusader from Massachusetts who happened to be in D.C. on Tuesday to take part in a separate protest.

"I just I couldn't wrap my head around it," said Morin, 19. "It's an optimistic day that we've been waiting for for so long, but it's crazy — and obviously, precedent-breaking that it comes so soon."

Read
Tuesday, May. 3, 2022

Bombers exact revenge in Banjo Bowl, lose Collaros to injury

Taylor Allen 6 minute read Preview

Bombers exact revenge in Banjo Bowl, lose Collaros to injury

Taylor Allen 6 minute read Saturday, Sep. 12, 2026

Redha Kramdi downplayed the significance of his return for the Winnipeg Blue Bombers.

“I don’t think I have that big of an impact,” said Kramdi on Tuesday, who watched the club go 2-4 while he was sidelined with a cast on his left hand.

It sounded silly at the time, and it’s even sillier now considering how exceptional the 29-year-old safety from Montreal was in Saturday’s 22nd edition of the Banjo Bowl.

Kramdi caused two turnovers — a forced fumble and an interception — to lead the Bombers to a 19-6 victory over the Saskatchewan Roughriders in front of a sell-out crowd at Princess Auto Stadium.

Read
Saturday, Sep. 12, 2026

Staying away to keep the heat on

Editorial 4 minute read Preview

Staying away to keep the heat on

Editorial 4 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

It’s a tough sell these days for U.S. tourism groups seeking to attract Canadian visitors as tension, tariffs and traded verbal barbs continue to rise between the two countries.

Read
2:00 AM CDT

Young Winnipeg Jet hopeful, Viggo Bjorck, shines brightly in prospects tournament

Mike McIntyre 6 minute read Preview

Young Winnipeg Jet hopeful, Viggo Bjorck, shines brightly in prospects tournament

Mike McIntyre 6 minute read Yesterday at 4:59 PM CDT

It’s safe to say Viggo Bjorck made plenty of new friends and fans this past weekend — including members of his own Winnipeg Jets prospects team which split a pair of tournament games in Quebec.

Take Davis Burnside for example. The undrafted 22-year-old forward, who signed with the Manitoba Moose last spring after finishing up at Ohio State University, couldn’t believe his eyes when he was put on a line with Bjorck, the eighth-overall pick from this summer’s draft and one of the most exciting young players in 2.0 Jets history.

“You see all the highlights and you just can’t wait to play with him,” said Burnside.

It wasn’t long before they teamed up for a highlight of their own. Bjorck made a sensational through-the-legs, no-look pass to Burnside on Sunday afternoon, setting him up for a shorthanded snipe in an eventual 6-4 loss to the Toronto Maple Leafs young guns.

Read
Yesterday at 4:59 PM CDT