Art store parking lot appeal successful
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Digital Subscription
One year of digital access for only $205*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 16/06/2022 (1511 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
A City of Winnipeg order to pave an 11,400-square-foot gravel parking lot its owner wants to convert into a green space has been rescinded.
Artists Emporium, which moved to its current space at 580 Roseberry St. in November, appealed the demand to pave the lot behind its new property, estimating it would cost more than $100,000 for that work.
Art supply store owner Janeen Junson said her business requires just a few parking spaces, so she doesn’t need the land for that purpose. She plans to instead convert the rear gravel lot into a green space with shrubs. It would be used for employee breaks, outdoor art classes and individual art projects.
She argued the paving requirement wasn’t fair, noting previous retailers at the same location weren’t required to do so.
On Thursday, city council’s appeals committee agreed, voting to remove the order.