US approves fast-tracking power plants in mid-Atlantic grid over complaints that it favors gas
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Monthly Digital Subscription
$0 for the first 4 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*No charge for 4 weeks then price increases to the regular rate of $19.00 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
Monthly Digital Subscription
$4.75/week*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Billed as $19 plus GST every four weeks. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
*Your next subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $16.99 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $23.99 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 12/02/2025 (301 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has approved a proposal from the operator of the congested mid-Atlantic grid to head off the potential for power shortages as demand for electricity grows due in part to a surge in artificial intelligence and energy-hungry data centers.
Critics, however, say the plan will effectively fast-track the construction of new natural gas plants over clean energy projects that don’t emit planet-warming greenhouse gases.
The commission’s Tuesday night decision, in a 3-1 vote, said the proposal by PJM Interconnection is “just and reasonable and not unduly discriminatory or preferential.” The proposal was originally submitted in December.
PJM, based in Pennsylvania, has said it made the proposal because a power shortage could affect the grid as early as 2026 as demand grows for electricity at the same time coal-fired plants and aging nuclear plants are retiring.
PJM’s criteria for an eligible project includes ones that are ready to build, can provide a relatively high power capacity and are likelier to produce electricity when the grid is most likely to see power shortfalls. It said it would open an application period for proposals and select 50 to study.
Clean energy advocates say the process favors gas-fired plants, and they blame PJM for creating the existing reliability problem by taking an unduly long time to study proposed wind and solar energy projects in its project queue.
Proposals awaiting PJM’s approval are more than 97% solar, wind or battery storage, according to federal figures. Less than 3% are natural gas.
Some critics questioned PJM’s process. The Ohio Consumers’ Counsel Office said it will be impossible for consumers to know whether PJM is selecting the most efficient or cost-effective power plants.
Demand for electricity has spiked for the first time in decades. AI, cryptomining, the broader electrification of society and bipartisan political pressure to bring manufacturing back to the U.S. are fueling new demand.
PJM coordinates the electric grid through Delaware, eastern Kentucky, Maryland, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia and Washington, D.C., as well as small portions of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan and North Carolina.
___
Follow Marc Levy on X at: https://x.com/timelywriter