Audit finds B.C.’s forest management hurt by flawed data without clear methodology
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Digital Subscription
One year of digital access for only $205*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 18/03/2025 (510 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
VICTORIA – An audit has found that British Columbia’s government did not have a clear method for calculating the carbon being stored or released in provincial forests, which undermined the credibility in reporting from the Forests Ministry.
The Office of the Auditor General of B.C. says in the report that defined methodologies to calculate forest carbon projections were not used for decisions such as the determining annual allowable timber cutting.
The audit found that staff did develop a model to calculate carbon benefits from certain investment programs in forestry, but the system was not approved for use by B.C.’s chief forester, and overall calculations were not “sufficiently documented to ensure consistency.”
It says the Forest Ministry used those carbon benefit projections in briefing notes and press releases, to set targets for future forest investments and to compare with goals set by the ministry in its annual reports.
Acting Auditor General Sheila Dodds says in a statement that a clear, defined method for calculating carbon benefits “is essential to the quality of the measurements and builds confidence in the projections.”
Dodds says the B.C. Forests Ministry has accepted the audit recommendations, and guidance for calculating consistent carbon projections for its forest planning was finalized at the end of 2024.
“Because the projected carbon benefit of the Forest Investment Program is not calculated using a defined methodology, the ministry’s assertions of its performance can’t be reviewed or replicated to assess their quality,” the audit says. “This lack of transparency negatively affects the credibility of the ministry’s reporting.
“While the ministry produced guidance to support carbon analysis for timber supply reviews, key elements needed to ensure consistency and transparency were missing.”
Dodds says the information on carbon storage and release from the forests is crucial for making forest-management decisions.
“A defined methodology for carbon modelling that outlines what’s measured — and how those measurements are done — is critical to ensuring forest carbon projections can be reviewed and replicated,” Dodds says.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published March 18, 2025.
