Letters of the day: Critical thinking required
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Digital Subscription
One year of digital access for only $205*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 11/06/2010 (5889 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
Re: Exam question angers B’nai Brith (June 9). One would hope that Manitoba’s Grade 12 students are, unlike their education minister, intelligent enough to understand that hatred and criticism aren’t synonyms.
SAM HEINRICHS
Winnipeg
Alan Yusim of B’nai Brith is reported to believe that a question on the provincial language arts exam "promotes anti-Israel hatred among some of the students who wrote the test." What was this exam question? "Explain whether or not you think people in the entertainment industry have a responsibility for making the world a better place."
Now I don’t much like the question either. It’s badly worded and I would have thought that a committee of teachers could have created a much better invitation to discuss, think, and write. The question, however, could certainly not be construed as inflammatory. It doesn’t lead the students to any conclusion about the responsibility of any nation for the suffering of children in any place. It deals with another issue entirely.
There is much ignorance and bigotry in the world and students must be taught to think critically and determine whether the information they are given is sufficient to enable them to reach reasonable conclusions. They cannot be taught such lessons by being exposed only to opinions that are not controversial
JOAN NEWTON
Winnipeg