Struggle for Métis rights was in Goulet’s blood

Advertisement

Advertise with us

As hosts of the One Great History podcast, Sabrina Janke and Alex Judge love exploring Winnipeg’s past. With Winnipeg’s sesquicentennial approaching, the two have produced a 16-episode podcast series that explores the city’s colourful history.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 13/05/2023 (1232 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

As hosts of the One Great History podcast, Sabrina Janke and Alex Judge love exploring Winnipeg’s past. With Winnipeg’s sesquicentennial approaching, the two have produced a 16-episode podcast series that explores the city’s colourful history.

The series is presented through the lens of 15 historical figures, focusing on critical events surrounding their lives and their impact on Winnipeg. Elzéar Goulet is the focus of the third instalment. The series will conclude Nov. 9, the day when Winnipeg became a city 150 years ago. Summaries from each podcast will be republished in the Free Press. The podcast can be found on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and through the One Great History website — onegreathistory.wordpress.com


The drive to fight for Métis rights was in Elzéar Goulet’s bones. His maternal grandfather, John Siveright, had fought in the Battle of Seven Oaks. His father had been part of a campaign to ensure hunting and trading rights in the 1840s. So when there were whispers the Hudson’s Bay Company was preparing to sell the whole of Red River — without consultation — to the newly formed country of Canada, it would surprise no one that Goulet quickly aligned himself with Louis Riel and the French Métis resistance. A hardy man who had spent the previous 10 years as a mail carrier trekking three times a week from Pembina to Red River, Goulet became second-in-command of the Métis militia.

Elzéar Goulet watercolour by Henri Julien circa 1903. (Société historique de Saint-Boniface)
Elzéar Goulet watercolour by Henri Julien circa 1903. (Société historique de Saint-Boniface)

Though a less prominent figure than Riel, Goulet was there throughout the Red River Resistance: when they patrolled for surveyors, when they built la barrière to keep out the new lieutenant governor, when they seized Fort Garry, and when they arrested a group of Canadians attempting to overthrow Riel. Witnesses say he was called “Captain” within the walls of the fort. Perhaps most significantly, Goulet was there when Thomas Scott, a brash young Irish Protestant who had vowed to kill Riel, was condemned to death. A member of the court martial that had passed the sentence, Goulet also escorted Scott to his execution by firing squad. According to some rumours, he even aided in the secretive disposal of Scott’s body through the ice of the frigid Red River.

Despite all this, the most lasting impact of Elzéar Goulet may have been the tragedies that followed in the wake of his death.

In September of 1870, Goulet was one of the few remaining members of Louis Riel’s provisional government in Red River. Though the provisional government’s delegates had successfully negotiated the Manitoba Act, the death of Scott had whipped up a storm in Ontario. The Wolseley Expedition, which came to Red River that summer, supposedly to establish rule of law and to help in the transition of power, had been joined by hundreds of Ontario volunteers. They were enraged at what they saw as a cold-blooded murder. Many Métis saw what was coming and fled, but Goulet stood steadfast at his land across the river in St. Boniface.

On Sept. 12, an acquaintance named Cunningham assured Goulet he had nothing to fear on the other side of the river. Cunningham did not know he was sending Goulet to his death. The following day, Goulet went to a saloon near Fort Garry. He was spotted there by James Farquarson, the father-in-law of Red River’s foremost anti-Métis rabblerouser, John Schultz. Farquarson called upon soldiers in the pub to grab Goulet and to kill him. Fleeing through a side door, Goulet ran down what is now Lombard Avenue, pursued by a group of men. Fearing for his life, Goulet jumped into the Red River and attempted to swim across to St. Boniface as the men threw rocks at him. Goulet did not make it across the river — whether struck by a stone or a heart attack, he soon lost consciousness and drowned

The inquest into the death of Goulet was disastrous: witnesses refused to co-operate, no clerks could be found and the magistrates presiding were inexperienced and diffident. Though the colonial office in London recommended Goulet’s pursuers be prosecuted, no one was ever held accountable for his death.

Goulet’s death confirmed to the Métis that they were no longer safe in Winnipeg. It also confirmed to the soldiers of the Wolseley Expedition that they could do as they pleased without consequence. With little to do and no authority willing to rein them in, the soldiers spent the following years enacting what the New York Times called a “reign of terror” over the community of Red River. An anonymous French-speaker wrote in 1871: “Our country people cannot visit Winnipeg without being insulted, if not personally abused, by the soldier mob. They defy all law and authority, civil and military.”

The French Métis were at particular risk, and often faced unprompted beatings. The daughter of Goulet was sexually assaulted, as were many other Indigenous and Métis women. And seemingly just as often, the violence was indiscriminate: the American consul to Fort Garry, James Wickes Taylor, wrote in 1871 of being beaten with a stick by a drunken Wolseley soldier.

The reign of terror would continue for years. By the time Winnipeg was incorporated, many Métis had moved westward, both to follow the bison and to find somewhere safe to live. While we celebrate Louis Riel today as Manitoba’s first premier, the next part of the story is often forgotten: that the landscape and populace of Winnipeg were changed irreversibly by the violence of the Wolseley Expedition and, more to the point, by the wilful failure of John A. Macdonald’s government to protect Manitobans who did not look, sound or worship like they did.

 

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Public versus private schooling

John R. Wiens 5 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

A Recent Maggie Macintosh piece (Enrolment up at alternative schools, Sept. 7) and several letters to the editor touted the benefits and values of private schooling. The executive director of the Manitoba Federation of Independent Schools, Andrew Micklefield, emphasized schools of choice and governmental cost-saving. A private, formerly public, schoolteacher emphasized finances, academics and parental support.

None are wrong in their arguments, but they are missing the main reasons for the existence of public schools, which has less to do with money and academics than with inclusion and equality. Nor do they adequately acknowledge the downsides of exclusion and elitism fostered by some aspects of choice and inequality. The increase in numbers of private schools and their attendees is a cause for some public concern.

Micklefield’s assertion is that private schools save the government money. Letter-writer Paulo Borges intimates he saves the province $52,500 ($15,000 each for three home-schooled children and $7500 for one private-school tuition), further suggesting that the savings are not used wisely by governments in supporting public schools.

In the front-page article, Micklefield and others go further to suggest that the main reason parents choose private schools is to receive an education in a Christian setting. That is a very limited rationale and certainly does not include the much larger variety of reasons why people choose private schooling or an even more restricted version of schools of choice, home schooling.

Is a better Winnipeg on the horizon?

Tom Brodbeck, Rebecca Chambers, Niigaan Sinclair and Brent Bellamy 20 minute read Preview

Is a better Winnipeg on the horizon?

Tom Brodbeck, Rebecca Chambers, Niigaan Sinclair and Brent Bellamy 20 minute read Yesterday at 4:00 PM CDT

Four Free Press columnists weigh in on the challenges ahead and how the city can become better.

Read
Yesterday at 4:00 PM CDT

Winnipeg a character all its own onscreen

Jen Zoratti 4 minute read Preview

Winnipeg a character all its own onscreen

Jen Zoratti 4 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

Watch something shot in Winnipeg with a Winnipegger, and you will be treated to a live running commentary. We can’t help playing “spot the location.”

When we recognize that field/statue/mall/intersection/theatre, we have to say it. It’s practically civically mandated.

A friend told me she was at a film screening at which people literally applauded footage of the Mint. (That likely would have been 2005’s The Constant Gardener.)

Being excited about seeing Portage Place Mall at Christmastime in the trailer for Violent Night 2 — and then exclaiming, to your husband, “Oh, look, it’s Portage Place Mall at Christmastime!” — is not, I will admit, particularly cosmopolitan behaviour. In fact, I could be accused of suffering from a mild case of Podunkitis.

Read
2:01 AM CDT

Husband of rival sex club owner accused in attempted bathhouse bombing

Morgan Modjeski 4 minute read Preview

Husband of rival sex club owner accused in attempted bathhouse bombing

Morgan Modjeski 4 minute read Thursday, Sep. 24, 2026

A Winnipeg bathhouse owner says he was shocked to learn the man accused of planting a pipe bomb outside his business is married to the owner of a competing sex and lifestyle club.

Christopher Gregoire, who recently took ownership of AQ Sauna, said a live pipe bomb was found by a “heroic patron” outside the club, formerly known as Aquarius Bath House, in the early morning hours of Sept. 11.

On Thursday, the Winnipeg Police Service announced Erik Lymen Olson, 59, was facing multiple charges in the incident. Olson is the husband of Adonis Men’s Spa owner Doug Pomanski.

“This is wild,” Gregoire said after learning of the charges.

Read
Thursday, Sep. 24, 2026

Jets’ brass warming up to El Nino?

Mike McIntyre 7 minute read Preview

Jets’ brass warming up to El Nino?

Mike McIntyre 7 minute read Yesterday at 10:51 PM CDT

Decisions, decisions.

The Winnipeg Jets held their final dress rehearsal Friday night before the curtain rises next week on the new NHL season.

Unlike their first three exhibitions, this one in Denver featured competitive lineups that looked an awful lot like what we’ll see when the games start counting, with plenty of star power and veteran presence on both sides.

So what are we to make of the Jets’ 5-2 loss to the mighty Colorado Avalanche, who captured the Presidents’ Trophy last year and are once again a legitimate Stanley Cup contender?

Read
Yesterday at 10:51 PM CDT

The never-ending, continuing war in Ethiopia

Gwynne Dyer 5 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

Another October coming up, and still the Nobel Peace Prize Committee refuses to give Donald Trump his prize. They even gave one to Barak Obama, who was Black and a Democrat and had only been in office for 20 minutes. Meanwhile, they ignore a man truly worthy of the prize, a man who ended eight wars last year alone. (He said so himself.)

Unfortunately the prize committee has a long record of backing the wrong person.

They gave it to Aung Sang Suu Kyi of Myanmar, who defended the Rohingya genocide: “I don’t think there is ethnic cleansing going on,” she said.

They gave it to former U.S. secretary of state Henry Kissinger, who ordered the secret carpet-bombing of Cambodia: “The illegal we do immediately; the unconstitutional takes a little longer.”