Judicial review request challenges denial of Corb Lund’s anti-coal petition
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Digital Subscription
One year of digital access for only $205*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
EDMONTON – Organizers of a petition to ban new coal mining on the eastern slopes of the Rockies have filed for a judicial review, challenging Elections Alberta’s decision that the petition failed.
The agency announced earlier this month that the anti-coal petition led by country singer Corb Lund didn’t gain enough verified signatures to move it forward.
Lund said at the time that roughly 35,000 signatures for the petition were rejected by Elections Alberta and that he had grave concerns about the fairness of the process.
The Water Not Coal petition drive needed almost 178,000 signatures to force Premier Danielle Smith’s government to consider passing a law banning new coal mining or sending it to a provincewide referendum.
In June, Lund delivered what he said were more than enough names to force the issue.
The review application to Alberta’s Court of King’s Bench argues the decision was unreasonable, procedurally unfair and inconsistent with the purpose of the Citizen Initiative Act.
Lund said more than 200,000 Albertans signed the petition in good faith and they deserve a fair and reasonable process.
“We believe Elections Alberta applied standards that were stricter than the law requires, and that thousands of Albertans were effectively shut out by verification processes that don’t make sense,” he said in a statement.
“This judicial review is about ensuring that citizens’ voices weren’t lost in technicalities.”
The elections agency said when it did random checks on the authenticity of names, statistical sampling led them to estimate 172,000 were verified, causing the petition to fail.
The judicial review request asks the court to set aside the decision, declare the petition successful or return the matter to Elections Alberta for reconsideration.
Elections Alberta said it has a clear and rigorous system and uses a statistical sampling process that was reviewed and approved by Alberta Treasury Board and Finance.
“People have a right to seek a judicial review, and we support that process,” the agency said Thursday in an email.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 30, 2026.
