July 11, 2020

21° C, Partly cloudy

Full Forecast

Close this


Advertise With Us

Weird science

International group of artists explores the frontier between avant-garde art and cutting-edge biotech

I Caught it at the Movies (detail) by Elaine Whittaker.

I Caught it at the Movies (detail) by Elaine Whittaker.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 8/1/2014 (2375 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Artists and scientists have more in common than you might think. Both rely on experimentation and creative problem-solving, and the lines dividing the fields have only blurred in recent years. Artists have begun exploring concepts and technologies borrowed from the life sciences and biotech industries, while an increasing number of trained researchers are putting their expertise to artistic use.

Toxicity, which opened at Plug In ICA last month, brings together 12 international artists working in the emerging field of "biological media." Loosely organized around notions of "contamination," the work examines technologically mediated (and sometimes destructive) interactions between human beings and their environment, other organisms and one another.

With projects reflecting a range of concerns and approaches, the exhibition has the feel of an artist-run science fair. Though too broadly focused to build towards any single thesis, many of its individual works suggest new directions for artists and researchers alike, offering thought-provoking critique and challenging perspectives.

Multiple works examine our place within the broader ecosystem. Amanda White questions our squeamishness around natural processes by growing tomato seeds salvaged from her own excrement, while Aganetha Dyck collects boards from wooden beehives, presenting the wax-smeared panels as artifacts of human-insect collaboration. Alana Bartol photographs herself wearing a ghillie suit in unexpected locations: designed to offer camouflage in wooded environments, the shaggy green outfit has the opposite effect in the manicured suburban landscape, succinctly illustrating the impact we've had on our physical surroundings. Elsewhere, videos revisit exhibition co-curator Jennifer Willet's BioARTCAMP, an 11-day retreat that invited artists to formulate unorthodox experiments in the 6,475-square-kilometre "petri dish" of Banff National Park.

Jennifer Willet's An INCUBATOR in Sheep's Clothing.

Jennifer Willet's An INCUBATOR in Sheep's Clothing.

One of several artists contributing lab-grown creations, Tagny Duff injects donated human skin samples with a specially engineered virus that creates bruise-like "living tattoos." (Why not?) Elaine Whittaker skewers Hollywood fear-mongering, inciting microbes to build lacy structures over stills from global-pandemic movies, while Niki Sperou uses a common laboratory test to reveal microscopic power struggles between bacterial cultures and antibiotic agents.

Alluding to concerns around genetic modification of food crops, "biohacker" Andrew E. Pelling manages to grow (unmodified) human and animal cells within the flesh of an apple, while Joe Davis highlights efforts to encode the genome of the fruit's wild progenitor, Malus sieversii, with a compressed copy of Wikipedia.

Some works rely on human subjects, such as David Khang's video work comparing the expressiveness of two Shakespearian actors' faces before and after Botox treatments. Citing research suggesting that strong magnetic fields might disrupt brain function and even "suspend a person's moral judgment," Ted Hiebert engages in some delightful slapstick pseudoscience, experimenting to see how many magnets it takes to attract one another through his entire head.

Founded 27 years ago in Florida, Critical Art Ensemble gained notoriety in 2004 after founding member Steve Kurtz was arrested on charges -- eventually dismissed -- related to suspicions of bioterrorism. While Toxicity avoids much of the knee-jerk alarmism that topics like genetic engineering and biotechnology can provoke, CAE's (harmless) reproductions of germ-warfare exercises, corporate bioengineering and the effects of incendiary weapons on living cells offer stark reminders that powerful technologies--and the governments and private interests who wield them -- require vigilant oversight.

With so much to take in, Toxicity benefits from a sustained visit -- and a grasp of high school biology (or at least an Internet-capable smartphone) probably wouldn't hurt. While none of the artists sets out to make revolutionary new scientific discoveries, their work provides new and unexpected ways of engaging with the complex, overlapping natural and man-made systems that govern daily life.


Steven Leyden Cochrane is a Winnipeg-based artist, writer and educator.


Advertise With Us

Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.

To those who have made donations, thank you.

To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.

The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.

After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.

If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.

We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.

The Free Press will close this commenting platform at noon on July 14.

We want to thank those who have shared their views over the years as part of this reader engagement initiative.

In the coming weeks, the Free Press will announce new opportunities for readers to share their thoughts and to engage with our staff and each other.

You can comment on most stories on The Winnipeg Free Press website. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

By submitting your comment, you agree to abide by our Community Standards and Moderation Policy. These guidelines were revised effective February 27, 2019. Have a question about our comment forum? Check our frequently asked questions.


Advertise With Us