The nature of things

Ellmann lambastes the patriarchy with verve and gusto in gutsy new essay collection

Advertisement

Advertise with us

Is “essays” the term to describe Lucy Ellmann’s collection of sharp observations and entertaining tirades, Things Are Against Us? Polemic? Blistering commentary? Political satire?

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 25/09/2021 (1806 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Is “essays” the term to describe Lucy Ellmann’s collection of sharp observations and entertaining tirades, Things Are Against Us? Polemic? Blistering commentary? Political satire?

None of these, really. Home truths is closer. The uncomfortable, embarrassing, mortifying truth about ourselves and our performance on this burning planet. But of course saying “our” is just being polite — I mean “men’s.”

The American-born, Edinbugh-based Ellmann is more direct. She lambastes the patriarchy with verve and gusto. The militarist, the capitalist, the deranged scientist, the gun lobbyist all lie strewn across the pages, having received a swift blow to the back of the knees or a cream pie to the face. A reader can luxuriate in her plain speaking. Plain speaking but no explaining for the refreshing Ellmann; she is the mistress of the blunt truth.

I read her 2019 epic, tour de force novel Ducks, Newburyport, in a way I’d never read before, furiously turning pages, ravenous to catch up and mentally exclaiming the whole time: “Sa-aame!! I kno-ow!,” sounding for all the world like a cross between a deranged teen and Mrs. Fawlty on the phone.

It was all recognition, identification, relatability. Here was a writer — at last — mirroring my own experience of the world, of reality now as it comes at us in bits and bytes in the first quarter of the 21st century. All of it. (And who had ever done that before?) She was the postie delivering my every thought, my every response to the world, by snowblower all over my front yard.

Amy Jordison photo
Lucy Ellmann
Amy Jordison photo Lucy Ellmann

In Things Are Against Us, Ellmann freely uses the same shtick, compiling her complaints, perceptions, fears, forebodings and outrage into lists that carry her reader on a white-water ride. “They seem almost innocent to me, my scruples and my scorn,” she confides wistfully before the book has even truly begun, “now that the whole human experiment is drawing to a close,” then continues with cheerful fortitude, “Still, let’s complain.”

Those three words announce the tone of the collection — non-academic, direct. They set her stance as their author — woman-to-woman. She is our cut-the-crap commentator with an important job to do, and we are not going to go down in this male-engendered mess without a fight. “Table of Discontents,” declares the next page.

The 14 pieces that comprise Ellmann’s discontents, vividly illustrated by Diana Hope, muster all of her comic powers in the service of her home truths. How much further along might we be now in the work of dismantling the patriarchy, if only feminists had refused to adopt (as they did) the pernicious academic practice of inventing their own incomprehensible language? What if they had instead sustained a healthy practice of plain speaking?

Their books continue to be stuffed with the jargon du jour. But do any of them make the case for stripping men of power as forcefully as: “Who invented the goddamm atomic bomb?” (Not to mention “genocide, totalitarianism, whaling, rugby and snuff movies”?)

Ellmann never pulls her punches and the best ones (“MEN HAVE RUINED LIFE ON EARTH”) turn out to be irrefutable.

Diana Hope illustration / supplied
Diana Hope illustration / supplied

Things may be couched in everyday language, but it is far from naïve. Ellmann has an entire kitchen drawer of sharp implements to carve up her subjects — though it’s likely she’d object to the violence of the metaphor. The device of the list, in Ellmann’s hands, achieves reliable results: “Men delight in unauthorized violence, but glory in legalized murder too… Give them a big grim death-promoting system they can glom onto, a male heirarchy that provides them with goals, loyalty, doom, destruction, epaulettes, good opportunities for rape, a general miasma of testosterone, a guaranteed pass on domesticity, and a stage for showy acts of heroism, and they’re happy as clams.”

Those “epaulettes” are there for good reason. Ellmann’s writing is always tighter than it pretends. The epaulettes perform a double function; they make you laugh and then they make you think, seriously.

Likewise, the word “Monopoly” is a comic ending to a list of male pastimes (“witch hunts, war, rape, drug cartels…”) until you remember that Monopoly is exactly what is being played in real life in our towns and communities.

Ellmann is entertaining, funny, loopy and brave, but, importantly, she’s empowering. You remember that you’re not alone. You wake up again to echoes everywhere — Harry Patch (look him up) calling war “legalized mass murder”; the Sept. 11 New York Times piece by Maureen Dowd, entitled Manning Up, Letting Us Down.

It’s good to know Ellmann is keeping her formidable comic weaponry trained on the people who got us into this pig show, “this great big radioactive cowpat of Growth and Progress and Pointlessness they’ve deposited everywhere,” because the patriarchy is still, as we burn, choosing growth, choosing consumption, competition, expansion, extraction, destruction — choosing to f— things up.

Pauline Holdstock is a novelist, short fiction writer and essayist living on Vancouver Island.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Westwood standoff ends with two arrested

Morgan Modjeski and Erik Pindera 3 minute read Preview

Westwood standoff ends with two arrested

Morgan Modjeski and Erik Pindera 3 minute read Thursday, Sep. 3, 2026

An hours-long standoff in Westwood came to an end Thursday with Winnipeg police arresting two men and seizing a gun.

Winnipeg Police Service officers were called to Byrd Avenue shortly before 9:30 a.m. after a man was seen walking with what appeared to be a firearm, said police spokesman Const. Claude Chancy.

Officers identified a home connected to the investigation, he said.

Two men were arrested but Chancy could not yet say what they will be charged with. It’s not clear whether either of the men arrested was the male spotted with a gun.

Read
Thursday, Sep. 3, 2026

Letters, Sept. 5

7 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

Clearing the air

Re: QDoc patients in middle of billing dispute (Sept. 4)

QDoc has been fortunate to have a genuine partner in the Manitoba government over the past several years. Premier Wab Kinew and Health Minister Uzoma Asagwara have been consistently clear that no Manitoban should go without care because of where they live, and that commitment is exactly why virtual care exists as a permanent, publicly available option today. We built MediNav, the province’s online appointment booking system, together with Manitoba Health, and that same collaborative spirit has helped make more than 350,000 patient visits possible through our platform — many of them evenings, overnights and weekends, reaching rural and underserviced communities that need it most.

We want to be direct with the people who rely on us: QDoc is not going anywhere. We continue to see patients today, and we will keep doing so tomorrow. The issue reported this week is a technical billing matter, not a service disruption, and we are actively working with the province to resolve it quickly, so we can keep growing our capacity to serve Manitobans rather than limiting it.

Smith’s pretzel logic confuses

Editorial 4 minute read Preview

Smith’s pretzel logic confuses

Editorial 4 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith had both sides of her mouth working overtime on Aug. 30, when she spoke at an event in Calgary to commemorate Alberta Day, the annual celebration of the province’s entry into Confederation in 1905 (officially Sept. 1, it was celebrated on the weekend).

Smith’s comments — and the things she did not say — revealed a lot about the political tightrope the premier is trying to walk over the challenges currently faced by her province. At the top of that list of challenges is a persistent campaign to separate Alberta from the aforementioned Confederation. A campaign that Smith appears to both support and oppose, depending on which day of the week it is.

Her Alberta Day remarks were an excellent case in point.

Smith has decided that on Oct. 19, Albertans will vote on a series of non-binding propositions in a province referendum. One of those questions will ask Albertans whether they want to hold a referendum on separation, thus making this fall’s vote a “referendum on whether to hold a referendum,” as some observers have dubbed it.

Read
2:01 AM CDT

Agriculture sector wary of ‘strong headwind’ from south

Laura Rance-Unger 4 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

Industry analysts talked in circles on a recent webinar as they discussed the implications for agriculture of Canada’s deteriorating relationship with its largest trading partner.

On one hand, panellists for the hastily convened Canadian AgriFood Policy Institute event acknowledged the futility of negotiating on quicksand: a deal made today with the United States might be sucked into the muck tomorrow.

But on the other, webinar panellists speculated with varying degrees of optimism over what it will take to get negotiators back to bargaining.

This disconnect isn’t unique to this cluster of analysts. However, it underscores the difficulty of coming to terms with the seismic shift in America’s attitudes towards Canada.

QDoc patients in tight spot over billing dispute

Chris Kitching 6 minute read Preview

QDoc patients in tight spot over billing dispute

Chris Kitching 6 minute read Thursday, Sep. 3, 2026

Manitobans have been pulled into a dispute between QDoc — a Winnipeg-based virtual health-care platform — and the NDP government over fees billed to the province for patient care.

An Aug. 24 email from QDoc to its users prompted concern or calls for clarity from Manitobans who use the 24-7 platform to see a physician or nurse practitioner through encrypted video calls.

“When I first read it, like many others, I assumed they were going to be nixing the service altogether because that’s the way it was presented,” Tyndall resident Stephanie Pituley said.

“Upon further research, obviously that’s not the case, but I am still concerned to be honest. How many people did that research, I don’t know.”

Read
Thursday, Sep. 3, 2026

Don’t settle for being ‘reasonable facsimile’

Maureen Scurfield 5 minute read Yesterday at 2:00 AM CDT

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: I always fall in love when the leaves start turning to fall colours. But, this year I have a big problem that could get me in terrible trouble. My heart is burning for a guy I can’t have — because he used to be married to my older sister. My sister is “possessive for life” and would divorce me as a family member if I took up with him.

Still, he’s been calling me at night to talk about her and I have been giving him advice during the long calls. You know what that means — a lot of things are being said in conversation after midnight, especially when both of us have been drinking wine!

The trouble is I know deep down I’m only a substitute for my older sister. I even look like her! He was crazy about her, but he wasn’t true to her, and she can’t forgive him for that!

I understand him. It isn’t in him to be “true blue” to anyone, just like it isn’t for me, either. He can be talking about missing her and then start talking about how much I am like her — “in all the good ways, minus her bad habits.” Nothing would hurt my sister more than me messing with her ex-husband seriously. How do I get myself out of this mess? He calls me almost every night.