June 4, 2020

Winnipeg
20° C, Fair

Full Forecast

Help us deliver reliable news during this pandemic.

We are working tirelessly to bring you trusted information about COVID-19. Support our efforts by subscribing today.

No Thanks Subscribe

Already a subscriber?

Advertisement

Advertise With Us

Viking artifacts proved divisive

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 6/10/2018 (607 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

For centuries, the mention of Vinland in the Norse sagas had fired the imaginations of researchers and historians. The stories told of great adventures to the West, centuries before the earliest European explorers arrived.

In the early 1930s, James (Eddy) Dodd, a prospector working near Beardmore, Ont., said he found a broken Viking sword and an axe head after blasting a tree stump from the ground. Some thought they were undeniable proof Vikings had travelled through the Great Lakes and into the heart of the continent. These relics were considered one of the greatest North American archeological finds — until they weren’t.

In Beardmore: The Viking Hoax That Rewrote History, Canadian historian Douglas Hunter looks of one of archeology’s most complex hoaxes. While an interesting topic supported by impeccable research, the information is dense, overly detailed and complicated, making it a challenging read.

"The Beardmore scandal had something of the quality of a runaway train, answerable only to its irresistible momentum, impossible to stop once it had gathered a sufficient head of steam," Hunter wrote.

"But the fact was that the people could have stopped it had no interest in doing so, or at least believed it could not be stopped unless they threw themselves under its wheels."

Dodd showed his findings to many, but few took his claims seriously — that is, until word reached Charles Currelly, head of the Royal Ontario Museum. Currelly purchased the items, which were deemed authentic, then set out to confirm their provenance.

But more and more people were noticing inconsistencies and problems. One of those was high school teacher Teddy Elliot, who initially believed Dodd and brought the items to Currelly’s attention. He later suspected it might be a hoax and began to compile evidence to the contrary. Another doubter was Thomas Tanton, a geologist who had mapped the area where Dodd said he had found his relics.

However, the extensive cast of characters on both sides of the issue further muddied the waters. Hunter examines the implications of social class, power struggles and professional infighting on the fight to prove the find real or a hoax. Those with power and influence (such as Currelly) were believed easily and often, while those without had to work twice as hard to prove their ideas and research.

Some of the advocates came up with even wilder stories based on the three worn pieces of metal. One was that the wandering Norse warriors had been absorbed into the local Indigenous populations, the racist and colonial undertones being that the European genes somehow "improved" Indigenous bloodlines.

In the mid-1950s, the find was finally disproven and the case closed. Most of those involved continued on with their careers while others faded from the limelight.

History is never clean and simple, and Beardmore: The Viking Hoax That Rewrote History proves it. While well-written and deeply researched, the sheer number of characters, the complex nature of the hoax and the vast amount of information is daunting in a popular history.

Julie Kentner is a Winnipeg writer.

Advertisement

Advertise With Us

Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.

To those who have made donations, thank you.

To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.

The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.

After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.

If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.

We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.

The Free Press would like to thank our readers for their patience while comments were not available on our site. We're continuing to work with our commenting software provider on issues with the platform. In the meantime, if you're not able to see comments after logging in to our site, please try refreshing the page.

You can comment on most stories on The Winnipeg Free Press website. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

By submitting your comment, you agree to abide by our Community Standards and Moderation Policy. These guidelines were revised effective February 27, 2019. Have a question about our comment forum? Check our frequently asked questions.

Advertisement

Advertise With Us