50 years later, 2001 still amazes

There was almost as much mind-blowing material left out of Kubrick's final cut as was kept in it

Advertisement

Advertise with us

Fifty years ago this week, Stanley Kubrick’s epic 2001: A Space Odyssey opened, first in Washington, D.C., and then New York. The influential film, which won an Oscar for its pioneering special effects, has been called Kubrick’s “crowning, confounding achievement” and a “quantum leap” in technological achievement by film critic James Verniere, who notes that Steven Spielberg called 2001 the Big Bang of his filmmaking generation.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 07/04/2018 (3055 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Fifty years ago this week, Stanley Kubrick’s epic 2001: A Space Odyssey opened, first in Washington, D.C., and then New York. The influential film, which won an Oscar for its pioneering special effects, has been called Kubrick’s “crowning, confounding achievement” and a “quantum leap” in technological achievement by film critic James Verniere, who notes that Steven Spielberg called 2001 the Big Bang of his filmmaking generation.

Timed to the anniversary, author Michael Benson’s latest work, Space Odyssey: Stanley Kubrick, Arther C. Clarke and the Making of a Masterpiece (Simon & Schuster), debuted Tuesday, and within Benson’s devotional telling is a wealth of intriguing facts and anecdotes.

Here are 19 things you probably don’t know about 2001, according to Benson and other sources.

• 2001 was originally going to show a precursor to the internet.

Kubrick’s intrepid band of futurists, Benson writes, “had seemingly already visualized important aspects of (a) new technology’s implications.” The film’s props would include a “2001 newspaper to be read on some kind of television screen.” And if the prop, which had a New York Times logo, had appeared in the film, it would have been “read by an astronaut on the iPad-type tablet computers” aboard the ship Discovery.

“Had Kubrick followed through and actually presented the newspaper in this way,” the author writes, “there’s no doubt that 2001: A Space Odyssey would be remembered today as an important harbinger of the internet.”

• The filmmakers also envisioned a world with self-driving cars.

“In early chapter drafts,” Benson writes, “the character who would become David Bowman is named Bruno,” and he rides a “computer-guided Rolls” along the “auto-highway” bisecting the great “Washington-New York complex,” child and dog in tow.

• Neither Kubrick nor collaborator-author Arthur C. Clarke believed they had ever seen a great sci-fi film.

Kubrick’s two-page introductory letter to Clarke teased the “possibility of doing the proverbial ‘really good’ science fiction movie.” Clarke’s reply: “The ‘really good’ science fiction movie is a great many years overdue.”

• The creation of the iconic monolith was a years-long process.

Early on, Clarke pointed Kubrick to his story The Sentinel, in which a survey team discovers a “diamond-hard crystal pyramid of alien origin, which has clearly been on the lunar surface for millions of years,” Benson notes.

Plus, Kubrick initially wanted the “alien object” — what became the monolith — to be clear, like a “transparent tetrahedron.” Kubrick urged that it be made of Plexiglas, but the material didn’t create the desired effect and the immense, expensive, clear monolith was trashed, replaced by a black monolith that reflected every smudge and flaw.

• The same year Kubrick began picking Clarke’s scientifically inventive brain, so was NASA.

Travelling from his home base of Ceylon/Sri Lanka, Clarke went to Washington in May of 1964 to meet with top NASA officials. The Apollo project director, Benson writes, solicited the author’s ideas on what the space agency should do after a moon landing was accomplished.

• 2001 went through a run of working titles.

Kubrick and Clarke, having seen MGM’s big Cinerama production How the West Was Won, privately titled their would-be semi-documentary “How the Solar System Was Won,” and then “How the Universe Was Won,” Benson writes. Other possible titles included “Universe: Tunnel to the Stars,” “The Star Gate,” “Jupiter Window” and “Earth Escape.”

• 2001 ran way over schedule and budget.

Kubrick told Clarke in 1964 that he was set to work on a film that would take “about two years to complete,” and a later deal eyed a late 1966 or early 1967 release with an initial budget of US$5 million. By the time the film opened April 2, 1968, the budget was about US$12 million, according to Box Office Mojo.

• Prose and pictures likely influenced the fetal imagery.

Part of the film’s source material was Clarke’s 1959 short story Out of the Cradle, Endlessly Orbiting, in which a narrator says that the 21st century does not begin in 2000, but rather Jan. 1, 2001. As Benson notes, that story ends with an awesome sound — “the thin cry of a newborn baby” — but it’s “the first child in all the history of mankind to be brought forth on another world than Earth.”

Clarke’s own futurism, Benson writes, was influenced by Russian spaceflight visionary Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, who said in a 1912 essay: “Earth is the cradle of the mind, but humanity can’t remain in its cradle forever.”

Benson also notes a pen-and-ink illustration that “depicted a fetus floating in a bubble-like amniotic sac” that looked “exactly like an unborn baby in space,” as reproduced in Robert Ardrey’s book African Genesis; and in 1965, Life magazine published its famous images of a fetus “floating in cosmic darkness,” as shot by Swedish photographer Lennart Nilsson.

• It was Kubrick’s idea to create a simultaneous novel and film.

“We will not sit down and write a screenplay,” Kubrick said in the summer of 1964, according to Benson. “We will sit down and write a novel. We’ll get much more depth.” As a result, the screenplay went through almost daily revisions during the film shoot.

• A meeting of the minds with Carl Sagan was short-lived.

In the early stages of planning, Clarke introduced Kubrick to the famed astronomer-author. Unfortunately, it was no great exchange. Kubrick found Sagan to be patronizing, Benson writes, and an hour after their 1964 meeting, Kubrick told Clarke to “get rid of (Sagan)… I don’t want to see him again.”

• HAL was a very gradual creation.

In Clarke’s “robot sequence” in an early chapter draft, the precursor to the eventual HAL-9000 mainframe is named Socrates, who is ambulatory and can be switched to “independent mode.” With each draft, Benson says, the IQ of this AI was increased.

And before the acronym HAL, the Discovery’s talking computer was named Athena.

As for the voice of HAL, Kubrick and Clarke had been influenced by an Oscar-nominated black-and-white short, titled Universe, that was produced by the National Film Board of Canada and directed by Colin Low. The 2001 filmmakers were struck by Universe’s techniques and hired Low’s effects collaborator, Wally Gentleman, for 2001.

Yet the casting of HAL’s voice was up in the air throughout the live-action shoot. Kubrick tried such actors as Nigel Davenport and Martin Balsam before hiring Douglas Rain — the narrator he had first heard in Universe.

• The movie began in a bra factory.

The first frames of 2001 were shot in early 1965, in an abandoned brassiere factory in New York. Inspired partly by Universe, Kubrick used paints, inks, paint thinner and high-intensity lights to create surreal spacey effects.

• There was a list of other possible directors.

When MGM was drafting a contract for Kubrick’s production company, one clause provided a short list of possible alternate directors, Benson notes, including Alfred Hitchcock, David Lean and Billy Wilder. “MGM was apparently hedging its bets in case Kubrick was for some reason unable or unwilling to direct the film,” Vanity Fair writes.

• One consultant had an interest in the psychedelic.

During filming, scientific consultant Fred Ordway, a former NASA employee, expressed interest via letter in the results of an early ‘60s academic experiment upon Boston divinity grad students, who had taken doses of psilocybin, a hallucinogen extracted from mushrooms. Some of the subjects described a “powerful cosmic homecoming” and “a sea of colour.” (One of the experiment’s thesis advisers, Benson notes, was Timothy Leary.)

• Kubrick cast his net wide for cutting-edge expertise.

The 2001 filmmakers consulted with more than 40 corporations, including IBM, Hewlett-Packard, Hilton Hotels, Bell Labs, Bausch & Lomb, Whirlpool and Parker Pens.

During a visit to Bell Labs, for instance, Clarke heard voice-synthesizer experiments with an IBM 7094 computer that produced a rendition of the 1890s song “Daisy Bell (Bicycle Built for Two) — “the first song ever sung by a computer,” Benson writes. HAL, of course, sings that tune in 2001.

• Simulated spaceflight was less daunting to some than airflight.

Kubrick and two of his 2001 stars, Keir Dullea and Gary Lockwood, had a fear of flying, according to Benson.

• The set was sometimes quite dangerous.

MIT artificial intelligence expert Marvin Minsky said he “could have been killed” during a set visit, when a mechanical accident close to him caused a “livid” Kubrick to fire a stage hand. Coincidentally, Benson writes, it was Minsky who had told Kubrick that computers in the year 2001 “might be advanced enough to suffer breakdowns when faced with apparently irresolvable conflicts.”

• The secret to the “Dawn of Man” performance: method mime acting.

Kubrick didn’t want his bone-wielding simians to look just like “men in monkey suits.” So he was introduced to Dan Richter, a rising London performer and American Mime Theater star who had also studied Noh and Kabuki theatre (striking up a lifelong friendship with Yoko Ono). Richter was in some ways a precursor to Planet of the Apes star Andy Serkis: His mime philosophy, as Benson writes, was “to start with acting values and extend them into purely physical movement.” (American Mime Theater’s founder studied under Lee Strasberg).

Richter arrived at a meeting thinking he might offer a quick consultation, but it turned into an audition after his transformational abilities dazzled Kubrick. Richter would not only play 2001’s murderous Moonwatcher but also teach his fellow “man-ape” performers how to move and act convincingly.

• The film debut in Washington was “a disaster.”

2001’s official premiere was at the Uptown theatre in Washington’s Cleveland Park neighbourhood, with stars and MGM brass in attendance.

By intermission, attendees were “streaming out. It was a disaster. No one liked it,” Benson recounts in his book.

Wrote one British journalist: “There was not a single handclap… The audience just rose, stunned and thoughtful, and shuffled out to the pavement.”

The next night, after the New York première, Clarke reportedly heard MGM suits saying: “Well, that’s the end of Stanley Kubrick.”

Within five weeks of opening in only eight theatres, though, 2001 had grossed more than US$1 million, and gradually, some critics began to see the light.

— Washington Post

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Liquor authority fines True North $12K after minors with fake ID served at Jets White Out party

Nicole Buffie 5 minute read Preview

Liquor authority fines True North $12K after minors with fake ID served at Jets White Out party

Nicole Buffie 5 minute read Yesterday at 6:17 PM CDT

True North Sports and Entertainment was hit with a $12,000 fine for serving minors with fake IDs during a Winnipeg Jets White Out street party in 2025.

Read
Yesterday at 6:17 PM CDT

A grand jeté of climate-change denial

Gwynne Dyer 4 minute read Preview

A grand jeté of climate-change denial

Gwynne Dyer 4 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

The first hurricane to hit Hawaii in 34 years. The Mediterranean on fire from Spain to Greece. ‘Heat domes’ one after another for months on end in Europe and North America. Thousands of excess deaths. A record El Niño piled on top of an average global temperature up from +1.2 C five years ago. Predicted high for this year: +1.7 C.

Surely they’ll get it now, you think — but no, they won’t. It once seemed sensible to think that when the climate damage gets bad enough and the trend line becomes impossible to ignore, ‘they’ (meaning the climate change deniers and their fellow travellers) will finally accept that the threat is real and urgent action is necessary.

A few of them will, but most will not.

It is becoming clear that as the old position of flat disbelief in climate science becomes untenable, the preferred response among former deniers is to admit that climate change is big, dangerous and already well underway — but to insist that it is already too late and nothing can be done about it now.

Read
2:00 AM CDT

Free fix is in: repair café aims to keep items out of landfills

Tiago Resko 3 minute read Preview

Free fix is in: repair café aims to keep items out of landfills

Tiago Resko 3 minute read Updated: Yesterday at 12:09 PM CDT

Stephen Kirk wants to give people a chance to fix items they’re not ready to let go of.

The Spence Neighbourhood Association staffer took notice when repair cafés started popping up around the world, and he decided to bring the idea to Winnipeg.

The café invites people to bring broken items like bikes, clothes and small kitchen appliances to the association’s headquarters to get free repairs by a team of skilled volunteers.

“Certainly in our neighbourhood, a lot of people’s motivation is economic, they would rather fix it than have to buy a new one,” said Kirk, the environmental and open spaces coordinator for the Spence Neighbourhood Association.

Read
Updated: Yesterday at 12:09 PM CDT

Daycare, family centre addition will turn care home into intergenerational community hub

Maggie Macintosh 4 minute read Preview

Daycare, family centre addition will turn care home into intergenerational community hub

Maggie Macintosh 4 minute read Updated: Yesterday at 3:29 PM CDT

Seven-year-olds and 70-somethings will socialize daily when a 152-spot daycare opens inside of a seniors’ residence in Winnipeg in a couple of years.

Construction on a new wing of the Saul and Claribel Simkin Centre is scheduled to begin this fall, it was announced Monday.

The project won’t be complete for at least 22 months, but it’s already being touted as a made-in-Manitoba model for intergenerational community hubs across the country.

“It’s a real good idea to mix the younger generation with the older generation,” said Allan Rutherford, a 79-year-old resident of the 200-bed personal care home in Linden Ridge.

Read
Updated: Yesterday at 3:29 PM CDT

An ambassador, a petition and 213,000 signatures

Editorial 4 minute read Preview

An ambassador, a petition and 213,000 signatures

Editorial 4 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

You have to admit, they have a point.

As of 7 a.m. on Monday, 209,909 Canadians had signed it. By 9:41 a.m., that number had reached 211,846. By 10:54 a.m., 213,124. And there are months left to sign.

It is an electronic petition to have the U.S. Ambassador to Canada, Pete Hoekstra, ousted and sent back to Trump’s America.

The reasons? Well, ambassadors are meant to represent the national positions of their governments and you could argue that Hoekstra is doing exactly that: his blunt pronouncements on things such as Canadian sovereignty sound very much like the words of one Donald Trump, President of the United States.

Read
2:00 AM CDT

Indigenous peoples are deeply invested in Canada

Niigaan Sinclair 5 minute read Preview

Indigenous peoples are deeply invested in Canada

Niigaan Sinclair 5 minute read Yesterday at 6:00 AM CDT

Elections Canada released a report this week that stated that, in the 2025 federal election, approximately 41 per cent of eligible First Nations, Inuit and Métis voters cast a ballot and contributed significantly to the federal Liberals and Prime Minister Mark Carney making a political comeback.

For anyone curious about how Manitoba fared, the numbers in this province were slightly lower — but still very strong, with 34 per cent participation.

This is a far cry from the highest rate of Indigenous participation in a federal election — that would be the 60 per cent who cast a ballot in 2015, when Justin Trudeau’s Liberals defeated Stephen Harper’s Conservatives — but it’s still higher than the abysmal numbers seen in decades previous.

First Nations voters have only been allowed the legal right to cast a ballot in Canadian elections since 1960, but many in the past — perhaps rightly — felt a sense of complicity in the country’s colonization or, worse, that voting didn’t make a difference.

Read
Yesterday at 6:00 AM CDT