Now and Then, the magic returns
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Monthly Digital Subscription
$1 per week for 24 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Billed as $4.00 plus GST every four weeks. After 24 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.00 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
Monthly Digital Subscription
$4.75/week*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Billed as $19 plus GST every four weeks. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
*Your next subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $16.99 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $23.99 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 29/11/2023 (692 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
On the Liverpool waterfront, there’s an impressive equestrian statue of King Edward VII outside the Mersey Ferry Terminal.
The eldest son of Queen Victoria, Edward VII was crowned in 1901, and hailed by English novelist J.B. Priestley as “the most popular king England had known” for nearly two and a half centuries.
Yet on the day my husband and I were there last September, hardly anyone stopped to admire the monument. Instead, tourists from all over the world flocked to the statues nearby, queuing for a chance to get a photo with the bronze likenesses of John, Paul, George and Ringo.

Kin Cheung / The ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES
Copies of a new Beatles single titled Now and Then on sale at a record store in London earlier this month.
People love the Beatles for many reasons — their incredible talent, their lyricism and musical innovation, their sharp wit, humble roots, camaraderie, their intrinsic decency.
But more than anything, the saga of the Beatles is a love story.
It’s the story of four young men who came together and explored their artistic talents, saw the world, fell in love, brought out the best (and occasionally the worst) in each other, raised families, basked in — and sometimes fled from — the adoration of their fans.
Even though some of us were still kids when the Beatles disbanded, their music stirred deep thoughts and feelings in us and became ingrained in our lives.
So, I waited for the Nov. 2nd release of Now and Then with nervous trepidation.
Hearing John’s plaintive voice was like the return of a long-lost, dearly missed friend:
“I know it’s true
It’s all because of you
And if I make it through
It’s all because…”
And then Paul’s voice joins his, their harmonies melding flawlessly like lifelong dance partners coming together after years of separation.
I surprised myself by bursting into tears, and they flowed harder upon hearing each Beatle’s signature contribution to the song — George’s rhythm guitar, Paul’s bass, Ringo’s drums and vocals in the chorus.
It’s why I disagree with the Nov. 10th assessment in the Free Press by The Washington Post’s Geoff Edgers, that “Now and Then is just OK. And that’s not nearly good enough.”
Edgers makes some well-informed observations, including that “because it is the Beatles, the bar is high, and expectations are higher.”
And he duly credits Yoko Ono — for years unfairly blamed for the Beatles breakup — with having brought the band back together by turning over John’s demo recording of Now and Then to the other three, the catalyst for this new recording.
But I disagree that the song isn’t nearly good enough.
It doesn’t measure up to the poignant poetry of Eleanor Rigby, or the awesome genius of A Day in the Life — but how could it? John and George weren’t here to painstakingly fine-tune their parts.
What makes Now and Then so special is that it’s a song that has catapulted through time — John’s 1970s voice and George’s 1995 rhythm guitar reaching out to us across the universe, joining Paul and Ringo again thanks to artificial intelligence.
It is part fragile relic, part high-tech treasure, deeply evocative, and greater than the sum of its parts for what it represents — the closest thing to a new Beatles song we will likely ever hear.
As George Harrison noted in a 1995 clip from The Last Beatles Song, the short film exploring the making of Now and Then, “To hear John’s voice, that’s a thing that we should cherish. I’m sure he would’ve really enjoyed that opportunity to be with us again.”
Ringo Starr added, “It was the closest we’ll ever come to having him back in the room.”
So, I listen to the song always with an accompaniment of tears.
I cry for the senseless murder of John and the loss of George. For the happy zaniness of Help and Sgt. Pepper and the heart-racing madnessof Beatlemania. For the Beatles’ loves and losses — lost mothers, failed marriages and new romances, John’s estrangement with Julian, Paul’s desolation when the band broke up; for hard feelings and reconciliation, for the death of Linda McCartney.
I cry for the end of the Beatles and all that they gave us; for my own lost youth and Paul’s and Ringo’s advancing years. For the Beatles’ messages about peace and love and the wretched state of today’s world.
Paul has said, looking back at the band: “My God, how lucky was I to have those men in my life.”
Weren’t we all.
Now and Then is not some second-rate ballad patched together with Beatles remnants. It is a love song.
A love song to fans; a celebration of the Beatles by the Beatles.
But most of all, it is a love song from John to Paul, and from Paul to John; an ode to a deeply affectionate partnership that even death could not sever.
“With love, from me to you.”
Pam Frampton is a freelance writer and editor who lives in St. John’s. Email pamelajframpton@gmail.com X: pam_frampton

Pam Frampton is a columnist for the Free Press. She has worked in print media since 1990 and has been offering up her opinions for more than 20 years. Read more about Pam.
Pam’s columns are built on facts, but offer her personal views through arguments and analysis. Every column Pam produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press‘s tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press’s history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
History
Updated on Wednesday, November 29, 2023 6:50 AM CST: Fixes lede paragraph