Doctors excited about targeted prostate cancer therapy, but can’t prescribe it yet

Advertisement

Advertise with us

Dale Cousins was thrilled when he saw his body scans from before and after a new prostate cancer treatment.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 06/07/2024 (806 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Dale Cousins was thrilled when he saw his body scans from before and after a new prostate cancer treatment.

“(The doctor) said, ‘Do you see any difference?'” the 79-year-old from Petrolia, Ont., recalled.

“I said, ‘all these spots around my abdomen, they’re gone.'”

Clinical trial patient Dale Cousins, right, stands with nuclear oncologist Dr. David Laidley after receiving a new prostate cancer treatment at London Health Sciences Centre in London, Ont., in this undated handout photo. THE CANADIAN PRESS/HO - Dale Cousins
Clinical trial patient Dale Cousins, right, stands with nuclear oncologist Dr. David Laidley after receiving a new prostate cancer treatment at London Health Sciences Centre in London, Ont., in this undated handout photo. THE CANADIAN PRESS/HO - Dale Cousins

Cousins is part of a clinical trial of radioligand therapy, or RLT — a precise targeting of cancer cells with radiation given intravenously. Oncologists say RLT is poised to become a new “pillar” of cancer care, alongside surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. But unlike Cousins, prostate cancer patients who aren’t in a clinical trial don’t have free access to it.

“We’re able to deliver this very specific therapy to specific cells in the body,” said Dr. David Laidley, a nuclear oncologist with Western University and London Health Sciences Centre.

“We’re able to deliver lethal radiation therapy specifically targeted to cancer cells and at the same time generally sparing the normal tissues,” said Laidley, who is the principal investigator for the London, Ont., site of the Canada-wide clinical trial comparing RLT to chemotherapy.

Cousins was diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2010 and has been through many treatments, including surgery. After being stable for several years, a scan last year revealed his cancer had spread and he was enrolled in the trial.

With the last of his six RLT infusions coming on July 10, Cousins has already had a “dramatic reduction” in cancerous lesions and his prostate specific antigen levels have decreased significantly, suggesting an “excellent response,” Laidley said.

Past clinical trials have already shown RLT’s effectiveness, leading to Health Canada approving Pluvicto — the radioactive drug that kills the targeted cancer cells — in August 2022 for patients whose prostate cancer has spread and chemotherapy has failed.

But almost two years later, advanced prostate cancer patients still can’t get public access to radioligand therapy because negotiations on how much it should cost government health plans are ongoing.

While waiting for that decision, there are men with prostate cancer who need the treatment to improve their quality of life and live longer, Laidley said.

“Oncologists are asking ‘can we refer patients or is this an option?’ And unfortunately, we have to say that it’s not available.”

Right now, radioligand therapy for cancer is only publicly available for patients with neuroendocrine tumours, an uncommon but not rare cancer that starts in neuroendocrine cells in the gastrointestinal system or the pancreas, said Dr. Simron Singh, a medical oncologist at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in Toronto.

Singh was the global principal investigator for a recent international clinical trial that found another radioactive drug delivered through RLT, called Lutathera, reduced neuroendocrine tumour progression and death by 72 per cent when given early after a patient’s diagnosis.

Like Pluvicto, Lutathera was already approved in Canada as a last line of cancer treatment but the trial results, published in The Lancet last month, were the first to show that RLT could be used as a “starting treatment,” said Singh, who is the co-founder of Sunnybrook’s Susan Leslie Clinic for Neuroendocrine Tumours.

In addition to neuroendocrine and prostate cancer, radioligand treatment using different radioactive drugs is currently in clinical trials for other types of cancers, he said.

“This is a new pillar (in cancer care) that we’re developing,” Singh said.

“It’s going to revolutionize the way we treat cancer completely in the years to come.”

RLT works by finding a target, which is usually a receptor on the surface of cancer cells that doesn’t exist in healthy tissue, he said.

Successful radioligand therapy depends on identifying that receptor in each patient’s cancer cells using a PET scan, then delivering the right radioactive medication — like Pluvicto for prostate cancer and Lutathera for neuroendocrine tumours — that will bind to the cancer cells and kill them without harming healthy cells, he said.

The Canadian Cancer Society calls radioligand therapy “a remarkable breakthrough” that started with Lutathera for neuroendocrine cancer around 2018.

”We saw patients having metastases all over their body and then with one or two treatments completely cleared up. It’s incredible,” said Stuart Edmonds, a pharmacology expert and the cancer society’s executive vice-president of mission, research and advocacy.

RLT also has “considerably lower” side-effects compared to traditional radiation because it minimizes harm to healthy cells, Edmonds said.

Now that RLT’s effectiveness in prolonging life for patients with metastatic prostate cancer who have run out of other treatment options has been proven, the cancer society is funding clinical trials across Canada looking at whether Pluvicto can be used for prostate cancer patients in much earlier stages of the disease.

In the meantime, Edmonds said it’s “tremendously important” to make Pluvicto publicly accessible for advanced prostate cancer patients.

“I just want it to be available in Canada as soon as possible,” he said.

Global pharmaceutical company Novartis manufactures both Pluvicto and Lutathera.

Both the company and the agency in charge of negotiating drug pricing confirmed to The Canadian Press that they have not yet reached an agreement on how much Pluvicto should cost.

The negotiations began in August of last year, but then had “an unanticipated delay,” said Dominic Tan, acting CEO of the pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance in an emailed statement.

“The pCPA always strives to complete the process as quickly as circumstances allow,” Tan said.

“However, negotiations are a two-way street, and as such we are unable to provide a precise timeline for when the process will be complete.”

Novartis said it recognizes the “high unmet need” of advanced prostate cancer patients.

“It is with these patients in mind that we continue to actively collaborate with the pCPA with the goal of achieving timely and responsible access to this therapeutic advance,” Novartis Canada spokesperson Rosa D’Acunti said in an emailed statement.

“We are hopeful that an agreement with pCPA that recognizes the significant innovation Pluvicto represents and the value it brings to patients is within reach.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 6, 2024.

Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Hellebuyck standoff caused by… Nathan MacKinnon?

Mike McIntyre 6 minute read Preview

Hellebuyck standoff caused by… Nathan MacKinnon?

Mike McIntyre 6 minute read Friday, Sep. 18, 2026

Looking for someone to blame in the Connor Hellebuyck fiasco and cast as public enemy No. 1? How about long-time Winnipeg Jets nemesis Nathan MacKinnon?

Allow us to explain as we fire up the time machine and head back to February in Italy.

Oh, what could have been if MacKinnon had been able to score on what appeared to be an open net late in the third period of the men’s gold medal game with Hellebuyck down and seemingly out of position.

Instead, the star forward fired wide, keeping the score deadlocked at 1-1 as the clock ticked down on regulation.

Read
Friday, Sep. 18, 2026

Winnipeg Jets at Edmonton Oilers

0 minute read Yesterday at 3:22 PM CDT

A quick look at where provinces and territories stand on time changes

The Canadian Press 2 minute read Preview

A quick look at where provinces and territories stand on time changes

The Canadian Press 2 minute read Friday, Sep. 18, 2026

WINNIPEG - Manitoba's government said Thursday the province will be sticking with daylight time year-round, making it the latest jurisdiction to move away from twice-annual time changes. Here's a look at where things stand across Canada:

British Columbia said in March that it was moving to permanent Pacific daylight time. The change also means that parts of northeastern B.C., which have been on mountain standard time year round, are now in alignment with the rest of the province.

Alberta also switched to permanent daylight time this year in what it calls Alberta time. The change means it now has the same time as Saskatchewan year round.

Saskatchewan has been on permanent central standard time since 1966.

Read
Friday, Sep. 18, 2026

Cabernet Sauvignon star of wine festival

Ben Sigurdson 5 minute read Preview

Cabernet Sauvignon star of wine festival

Ben Sigurdson 5 minute read Yesterday at 3:00 AM CDT

The Winnipeg Wine Festival will celebrate the king of red wine grapes next weekend — the theme of this year’s festival, which takes place Sept. 25 and 26 at the RBC Convention Centre, is Cabernet Sauvignon.

Cab Sauv, as it’s also known, is the world’s most widely planted wine grape of any colour, first coming to prominence in the 1800s in France’s Bordeaux region, where the grape is still popular. Rather than single-variety wines, Bordeaux reds tend to be blends, with those coming from the left bank of the Gironde estuary being Cabernet-dominant, while right-bank wines are Merlot-dominant, with Cabernet Sauvignon playing a supporting role. Cabernet and Merlot work well together and many other countries have followed suit in blending the two.

A team at University of California Davis put Cabernet Sauvignon through a DNA test in 1996 and discovered its parent grapes are Cabernet Franc and Sauvignon Blanc — it’s likely that at some point the two varieties, planted next to each other in some vineyard, crossed and mutated and became the grape we know today. (Someone growing grapes in the 19th century must have had an inkling of what was up, as the grape has been called Cabernet Sauvignon since long before the DNA test.)

Flavour-wise, most Cabernet Sauvignon wines are big and bold, with a core of deep dark berry flavours, some graphite and spice notes and relatively bright acidity. It’s a grape that is well-suited to barrel aging, with most examples seeing at least some time in wood.

Read
Yesterday at 3:00 AM CDT

Canada must not accept another Iranian autocracy

David Matas 5 minute read Yesterday at 2:01 AM CDT

Iran is a state run by a radical government victimizing its citizens and its neighbours. How do we change that? Any regime change that repeats the mistakes of the past is not a solution.

What went wrong in the past which led to the current regime? One answer is the U.K. and American aided coup which led to the ouster in 1953 of a democratically elected government headed at the time by Mohammad Mossadegh and its replacement with an American friendly autocrat, the Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.

The Shah imposed his rule through the Iranian National Intelligence and Security Organization — SAVAK, the acronym of its Persian name. SAVAK systematically inflicted torture, arbitrary killings and extra-judicial killings on perceived opponents of the regime. It was only a matter of time before repression of a regime directed to serving foreign interests would be overthrown.

What replaced the regime of the Shah, in 1979, the current regime of the mullahs, is a regime as intolerant and violent as the regime of the Shah and then some. That was not inevitable. But neither was it surprising. The vicious nature of the current regime, following the example set by the Shah, and its hatred for the United States, reacting to the U.S. aided imposition of the Shah, both echoes and reacts to the past. In 1979, the U.S. reaped what it sowed in 1953.

Puzzles Palace

1 minute read Monday, Jul. 27, 2026

To solve our puzzles, please subscribe with this special offer: |