Ottawa’s plan to recover weed-regulating costs with hefty fees catches industry off guard

Advertisement

Advertise with us

Ottawa has unveiled a new plan to cover the costs of regulating legal cannabis by having the industry foot the bill.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 12/07/2018 (3010 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Ottawa has unveiled a new plan to cover the costs of regulating legal cannabis by having the industry foot the bill.

“Cost recovery is based on the principle that the public should not bear the costs of government activities in cases where private parties derive the primary benefit,” says a federal consultation paper released Thursday afternoon.

The proposed fees will cover costs borne by primarily by Health Canada, which expects to spend about $50 million a year regulating the recreational and medical cannabis industries, but also by the Canada Border Services Agency, the RCMP, Public Safety Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada, the paper says.

fees will cover costs borne by primarily by Health Canada. (Sean Kilpatrick / The Canadian Press files)
fees will cover costs borne by primarily by Health Canada. (Sean Kilpatrick / The Canadian Press files)

Industrial hemp producers, analytical laboratories, researchers and medical users licensed to grow their own supply will be exempt from the fees, the paper says, along with those who hold licences to produce “health products containing cannabis,” including natural health products.

The proposed fees fall into four categories. Screening licence applicants will cost larger cultivators, processors and sellers $3,277. Smaller “micro” cultivators and processors will pay $1,638 per application, as will cannabis nurseries.

Permits for importing and exporting cannabis will cost $610 per request, and security-clearance screenings for key cannabis industry employees will cost $1,654.

Most significantly, licensed cannabis companies will pay an annual fee that “aims to minimize the overall administrative burden” of regulation. Those fees will be determined using formulas that consider both gross revenue and a company’s size.

For example, a company that holds a standard cannabis cultivation licence will pay 2.3 per cent of gross revenue or $23,000, whichever is greater.

A micro-cultivator with gross revenues of less than $1 million will pay the greater of one per cent of gross revenue or $2,500, while those earning more than $1 million in gross revenue would pay 2.3 per cent.

Licensed cannabis producers who grow, process and sell only to registered medical cannabis users will be spared from paying the annual fee.

Companies “will not be permitted to begin or continue operations until the fee has been paid in full,” the document says.

The consultation period will allow Canada’s legal cannabis industry to provide feedback on the proposed fees until Aug. 13. The document asks companies whether they feel the approach is fair and whether it will affect their competitiveness, as well as whether they believe the fees will “support the development of a diverse industry that includes small business.”

Timing ‘intensely problematic’

Players in the Canadian industry were “surprised by the timing of the consultation and proposal,” said Allan Rewak, executive director of the Cannabis Council of Canada trade association.

“Several multi-year supply agreements have already been signed between producers and (provincial) Crown wholesalers, and these didn’t include the very significant added costs for proponents.”

Cannabis companies and the federal government had previously discussed the topic of cost recovery, Rewak said.

“But at this late stage in the game, adding an additional tax measure of 2.3 per cent of revenues, over and above the 10 per cent excise tax, is something that we believe could hinder the ability of (licensed producers) to compete with the black market.”

Rewak said the association will start working with its members through the retail supply chain to figure out the exact cost impact of the proposed fees.

“But from an initial analysis of it, I believe that the most appropriate course would be to defer this proposal, and specifically the ongoing regulatory fees within the proposal — that 2.3 per cent of revenues — until the legal market’s established, so that we can secure some real data on what sales look like and really track our success in suppressing the black market, which is our shared goal.”

The industry isn’t opposed to the idea of regulatory cost recovery, he added.

“But from the timing of this proposal… when we’re just about to roll into an adult consumer-use marketplace, is intensely problematic,” he said.

The new fees were authorized by a clause in the federal government’s Cannabis Act, which was passed in June and will open the market for legal recreational marijuana sales to adults on Oct. 17.

solomon.israel@theleafnews.com    

@sol_israel

History

Updated on Thursday, July 12, 2018 2:49 PM CDT: Fixed incorrect figure in quote.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Kids deserve better

Jordan Laidlaw 4 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

As much as I cling to hope, I recognize the ominous circumstances and questionable future that our young people stand to inherit.

Province to fund livestock cop to cut down on theft

Connor McDowell 3 minute read Preview

Province to fund livestock cop to cut down on theft

Connor McDowell 3 minute read Updated: 1:08 PM CDT

BRANDON — The Manitoba government will fund a new RCMP position dedicated to investigating livestock theft.

The province made the announcement Thursday.

Agriculture Minister Ron Kostyshyn said the investigative role will fill a pressing need.

“Personally speaking, I think this has been a long time waiting for this to come to reality,” the Dauphin MLA said Wednesday. “We are doing a great thing for the industry.”

Read
Updated: 1:08 PM CDT

Puzzles Palace

1 minute read Monday, Jul. 27, 2026

To solve our puzzles, please subscribe with this special offer: |

Police seize cocaine valued at $1.5M, about $750K in cash in raid on St. Vital house

Scott Billeck 5 minute read Preview

Police seize cocaine valued at $1.5M, about $750K in cash in raid on St. Vital house

Scott Billeck 5 minute read Updated: 1:27 PM CDT

A St. Vital homeowner and her husband were going about their business during an afternoon last month when police officers in tactical gear suddenly appeared, walking across their front lawn.

The target was a few doors down: a home on a quiet stretch of Satinwood Place, within earshot of children playing outside at a nearby school.

The homeowner, who asked not to be named to protect their privacy, said the police presence caught the couple by surprise in the Southglen neighbourhood, where they weren’t accustomed to seeing that kind of activity.

“We never heard the (police) cars pull up, but there were cars blocking the entrance to the street from both sides,” said the neighbour. “They had a shield, a battering ram — everything. Just not used to seeing that.”

Read
Updated: 1:27 PM CDT

Ladies and gentlemen of voting age, please turn your attention to the centre ring…

Dan Lett 5 minute read Preview

Ladies and gentlemen of voting age, please turn your attention to the centre ring…

Dan Lett 5 minute read Yesterday at 3:40 PM CDT

If there’s one thing that we in the news business wish for any election, it’s that the campaign is competitive and voters have multiple, viable options when it comes time to cast their ballots.

That is certainly what I wished for in this year’s Winnipeg mayoral election: a ballot with two or more competent candidates — including incumbent Scott Gillingham — that offered contrasting visions for the future of the city.

Unfortunately, this time we didn’t get competent or viable. Instead, we got a clown show stuffed with candidates for mayor who have demonstrated a stunning capacity for self-inflicted wounds.

It all started when mayoral candidates Kevin Klein and Mike Vogiatzakis both alleged they had been asked by each other’s campaign to step down to give the remaining candidate a better shot at defeating Gillingham.

Read
Yesterday at 3:40 PM CDT

Klein claims he was offered PC party position to exit 2022 mayoral race to help Gillingham win

Carol Sanders 6 minute read Preview

Klein claims he was offered PC party position to exit 2022 mayoral race to help Gillingham win

Carol Sanders 6 minute read Updated: Yesterday at 12:32 PM CDT

Mayoral candidate Kevin Klein said he was offered a position with the provincial Tories if he pulled out of the 2022 mayoral race that saw then-city councillor Scott Gillingham defeat former mayor Glen Murray.

Read
Updated: Yesterday at 12:32 PM CDT