Should Good Friday remain a stat holiday?

Advertisement

Advertise with us

Is Good Friday a discriminatory holiday? That was the question raised by the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) last fall when it published a discussion paper on religious intolerance.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 30/03/2024 (898 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Is Good Friday a discriminatory holiday? That was the question raised by the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) last fall when it published a discussion paper on religious intolerance.

In the paper, the Commissions suggested that day and Christmas are not only “grounded in Canada’s history of colonialism” but are “an obvious example” of religious intolerance—being the “only Canadian statutory holidays linked to religious holy days.”

The result, the paper went on to say, is that while Christians are privileged by getting days off for their religious observances, non-Christians may experience intolerance or discrimination since they need “to request special accommodations to observe their holy days and other times of the year where their religion requires them to abstain from work.”

The paper sparked a furor in Quebec. In November, the National Assembly denounced it and voted unanimously in favour of a motion defending Christmas as something that has “been part of Quebec heritage for several generations.”

A day later, the House of Commons adopted a Bloc Quebecois motion that also denounced the paper and invited “all Quebecers and Canadians to unite as we approach the Christmas season.”

In response, Charlotte-Anne Malischewski, interim chief of the CHRC, wrote: “To be clear, the Commission has not issued a statement or a position on Christmas or any other religious holiday.”

Christmas, she went on to say, “is an important and time-honoured tradition in Canada. It is both spiritually and culturally significant for millions of people in this country, Christians, and non-Christians alike.”

The issue, Malischewski said, was not about the importance of Christmas, and the Commission wasn’t advocating for the country to drop it as a holiday.

Instead, it was making sure people of other religions can be reasonably accommodated when they want time off to celebrate their special holy days.

The goal of the paper was to start a conversation about how everyone in Canada could “practice their religion with the same equality, dignity, and respect as others,” Malischewski said.

What’s worth noting about the political furor surrounding the paper was not how politicians rose in defence of Christmas — who would be foolish enough to speak or vote against it? — but how nobody mentioned Good Friday.

Neither motion included that holiday, which is one of the holiest in the Christian calendar, or suggested it should also be protected because of its importance to Canadians at large.

And the reason for that is simple: It isn’t that important. For most Canadians, Good Friday is just a day off in spring, a welcome “secular pause,” as one person put it, a chance to enjoy a long weekend.

It’s nothing at all like Christmas, which is deeply ingrained into Canadian society, traditions and — very importantly — commerce. (Nobody has found a way to make money off Good Friday yet, as far as I can tell.)

My guess is Good Friday isn’t even that important for most Christians; churches that held services yesterday were probably not packed, unlike what will happen tomorrow, on Easter Sunday — traditionally one of the busiest Sundays for churches each year.

So why is Good Friday still a statutory holiday in our very secular and post-Christian country? With so many people from other religions now calling Canada home, why do they have to take vacation days for their religious holidays while Christians get an official day off?

That’s a question being tackled by Paige Thombs, an associate fellow at the University of Victoria’s Centre for Studies in Religion and Society. In an article in the Anglican Journal, Thombs noted the large number of immigrants coming to this country each year, many of them not part of the Christian religion.

“If we continue this trajectory, those numbers [of non-Christians] are only going to get bigger,” Thombs said. “Are things going to have to change? I think so. I hope so.”

One of these changes, she suggested, would be giving all workers a set number of paid days off in order to observe their religious practices. But why stop there? Why not eliminate Good Friday as a statutory holiday altogether and let everyone — Christian and non-Christian alike — claim a day a year for their unique religious observances?

That way, everyone is on the same footing. Christians who want to go to church on Good Friday could ask for a day off for that reason, just like Hindus could do for Diwali, Jews for Rosh Hashanah and other observances and Muslims for Eid. People with no religion could simply ask for a mental health day — something we all could use now and then.

If that happened, maybe we would achieve the goal set out by the Human Rights Commission to make Canada a place where everyone, no matter what their religion or lack of it, feel more included.

faith@freepress.mb.ca

The Free Press is committed to covering faith in Manitoba through our Religion in the News project. This reporting continues because readers like you step forward to fund it.

Donate now to support our reporting on religion.

Your donation is eligible for a charitable tax receipt. BECOME A FAITH JOURNALISM SUPPORTER

John Longhurst

John Longhurst
Faith columnist & reporter

John Longhurst has been writing for Winnipeg's faith pages since 2003. He also writes for Religion News Service in the U.S., and blogs about the media, marketing and communications at Making the News.

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

The Free Press acknowledges the financial support it receives from members of the city’s faith community, which makes our coverage of religion possible.

More Stories

Treating the disease we simply won’t insure

Rafiq Andani 5 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

There is a condition affecting tens of thousands of Canadians.

In 2024, one national measure estimated that almost 120,000 people had the condition. The estimate captures only part of the problem.

The same data show its chronic form becoming more common. In 2017, an estimated 28,900 people met the definition for its chronic form. By 2024, there were 36,058, an increase of almost 25 per cent.

This condition carries an unfortunate prognosis.

Groups call for end to tariffs on sports gear, warn of economic impacts

Catherine Morrison, The Canadian Press 4 minute read Preview

Groups call for end to tariffs on sports gear, warn of economic impacts

Catherine Morrison, The Canadian Press 4 minute read Updated: Yesterday at 9:52 AM CDT

OTTAWA - Some sports organizations and companies are urging governments on both sides of the border to suspend sports-related tariffs, warning of heightened economic challenges and waning participation in healthy activities.

The trade war between Canada and the United States has been escalating for weeks after talks on a trade deal collapsed in mid-August.

The next day, U.S. President Donald Trump imposed 50 per cent duties on $28 billion in Canadian goods, including hockey equipment, golf and gym equipment and fishing rods and parts.

Canada, in turn, implemented retaliatory tariffs on Sept. 8. They also target several categories of sporting goods, including track suits, ski suits and swimwear, golf equipment and fishing rods.

Read
Updated: Yesterday at 9:52 AM CDT

A man has been arrested and remains in police custody after being charged with spraying bear spray inside a Henderson Highway hotel in early July. The suspect is also accused of  pointing a gun, chasing people and making violent threats in the hotel's parking lot after a dispute over a VLT ticket at the licensed establishment in the 1000 block of Henderson Highway.

Matthew Joseph Marriott, 33, was arrested Sept. 10, the Winnipeg Police Service stated in a news release Sunday. He is charged with several firearms and weapons offences as well as possession of heroin.

Police say the suspect discharged a canister of bear spray at a 36-year-old man and into the bar area of the Curtis Gordon Hotel before going into the parking lot and pointing a gun at people. The firearm was determined to be an airgun, a Sig Sauer MCX. Officers found it on scene, in a backpack, after the suspect fled. The backpack also contained bear spray a knife and a small quantity of suspected heroin, the news release stated.

Downtown no place to be after dark, huge majority of Winnipeggers say in survey

Joyanne Pursaga 8 minute read Preview

Downtown no place to be after dark, huge majority of Winnipeggers say in survey

Joyanne Pursaga 8 minute read Friday, Sep. 11, 2026

Most Winnipeggers are afraid to walk alone downtown and believe the city needs more police officers, a new survey finds.

Winnipeg Police Service released its 2026 citizen survey Friday.

Downtown safety appears to remain a major concern, with just 44 per cent saying they feel very or reasonably safe walking alone in the area during the day. The number plummets to eight per cent overall at night, down from nine per cent in 2024, the last time the survey was conducted.

This year, 14 per cent of men felt very or reasonably safe walking alone downtown at night, compared to just three per cent of women.

Read
Friday, Sep. 11, 2026

Drug recovery centre opens office in ‘heart of the city’

Morgan Modjeski 3 minute read Preview

Drug recovery centre opens office in ‘heart of the city’

Morgan Modjeski 3 minute read Saturday, Sep. 12, 2026

Richard Halverson found his freedom from addiction through Adult & Teen Challenge and, six years later, he hopes a new Winnipeg location will bring hope to the city.

Read
Saturday, Sep. 12, 2026

Fathers united by loss share warning about dangers of fentanyl

Marsha McLeod 5 minute read Preview

Fathers united by loss share warning about dangers of fentanyl

Marsha McLeod 5 minute read Yesterday at 7:30 PM CDT

Harlan James Edward Fourre would have turned 35 on Sunday.

But instead of celebrating his birthday, Fourre’s father organized a sombre walk through downtown Winnipeg to commemorate his son and the many others who have died of fentanyl poisoning.

Three and a half years ago, Harlan Fourre took a recreational drug he believed was ecstasy but turned out to contain fentanyl, which killed him, said his father Joseph Fourre, a Red River Métis citizen, actor and filmmaker.

Fourre said his son was a master roofer, working on a job in The Pas around the time of his death. He wasn’t known to use drugs — in fact, his boss relayed that if someone pulled out an illicit substance at the end of a job, Harlan’s response would be: “no thanks, I’m good.”

Read
Yesterday at 7:30 PM CDT