State parks in Florida appear off-limits to development as lawmakers react to outcry
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Monthly Digital Subscription
$1 per week for 24 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Billed as $4.00 plus GST every four weeks. After 24 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.95 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
Monthly Digital Subscription
$4.99/week*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Billed as $19.95 plus GST every four weeks. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
*Your next subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $16.99 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $23.99 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 01/05/2025 (330 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) — State parks would be protected from pickleball courts, golf courses and hotel development under a bill passed unanimously by the Florida House on Thursday in response to last summer’s statewide outcry over plans for these kinds of projects.
The bill now heads to Gov. Ron DeSantis for final approval, and his office hasn’t said if he’ll sign it. The Republican governor distanced himself from the proposal following the backlash, saying he never saw or approved plans to allow resorts and sports facilities on state park land. DeSantis leads and appoints the heads of all state agencies.
The issue created a dilemma for Republican lawmakers who have traditionally defended the governor’s administration, and increased scrutiny of DeSantis’ record on environmental conservation.
Protections for state parks are reflected “loud and clear” in the bill, said state Rep. John Snyder.
“We’ve put real plans in place to make sure that, for generations to come, our state parks will be preserved,” said Snyder, who represents a district about an hour north of Palm Beach. He noted the parks are enjoyed by millions of residents and tourists alike.
The bill doesn’t ban all types of development. But any projects must be “conservation-based recreational uses” that support things like hiking, swimming, horseback riding, boating, studying nature and other similar activities, according to a House staff analysis.
Snyder said the bill’s language was strengthened by an amendment proposed in the Senate, which also added a name change for a state park in Tallahassee.
The public first got wind that DeSantis’ environmental agency was looking for recreational development plans in state parks when the Great Outdoors Initiative was leaked last August. Hundreds of people protested at parks and the state’s environmental protection headquarters, waving signs like “Parks Over Profit” and “Save Don’t Pave.”
Before the month was over, the governor said the Department of Environmental Protection’s plans were “going back to the drawing board.”
The environment secretary at the time, Shawn Hamilton, eventually stepped down after facing intensified scrutiny and bipartisan criticism of the initiative. In November, DeSantis appointed a new head of the agency, Alexis Lambert.