Residents say Port of Montreal expansion in Contrecoeur unnecessary, harmful
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Monthly Digital Subscription
$1 per week for 24 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Billed as $4.00 plus GST every four weeks. After 24 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.00 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
Monthly Digital Subscription
$4.75/week*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Billed as $19 plus GST every four weeks. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
*Your next subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $16.99 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $23.99 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
MONTREAL – Dozens of residents of a town northeast of Montreal where the Port of Montreal wants to expand capacity at a container facility say the project is unnecessary and harmful.
Residents demonstrated Sunday to show their opposition to the project, which is among the first group of five nation-building infrastructure projects that Prime Minister Mark Carney hopes to see approved and implemented quickly under the Building Canada Act.
Residents argue the plan to have Contrecœur terminal to eventually handle an estimated 1.5 million containers annually is one that is harmful to health, the environment, as well as being unnecessary.
The federal government and port officials say the project is to meet a future need but its opponents have argued it doesn’t fall under a project of national interest under Bill C-5 to increase Canadian autonomy, as it would increase dependence on foreign countries while circumventing Canadian and Quebec environmental laws.
However, the Montreal Port Authority says in a statement the project has undergone a comprehensive environmental assessment process and received a favourable decision.
Hélène Reeves, spokesperson for the Vigie citoyenne Port de Contrecœur, a citizen-driven movement, says she was taken aback after hearing Quebec Premier François Legault describe the St. Lawrence River as a “highway” that allows for moving goods while emitting less greenhouse gases.
Reeves said in an interview on Sunday that economic vision is outdated and that it is harmful to pursue an economy that destroys the environment while in the midst of a climate crisis.
The port authority is moving ahead with preparatory work, which includes installing fences and access roads, constructing work platforms, selective tree cutting, and outfitting offices at the site, about 45 kilometres northeast of Montreal.
The work also involves dredging the bottom of the St. Lawrence River, habitat of the copper redhorse, an endangered fish species. It needs approval from Fisheries and Oceans Canada.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 26, 2025.