Liberal platform carries $78B in new spending, $25B in new revenue, over five years

Advertisement

Advertise with us

The Liberals laid out a detailed pitch to voters Wednesday, vowing to spend $78 billion in new money over the next five years as they painted themselves as the only party with the numbers to back up their promises.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 01/09/2021 (1859 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

The Liberals laid out a detailed pitch to voters Wednesday, vowing to spend $78 billion in new money over the next five years as they painted themselves as the only party with the numbers to back up their promises.

The 82-page re-election platform lays out expenditures totalling more than three times the direct new revenues expected in that period, including all of the announcements Trudeau has made to date on $10-a-day child care, new mental health transfers to the provinces, climate change and housing.

But it also throws down two political wedges targeting Conservatives — enshrining abortion services as publicly funded and medically necessary in the Canada Health Act and going further on their existing gun ban.

Justin Trudeau talks with reporters after taking part in a virtual G7 meeting on the crisis in Afghanistan virtually from Hamilton, Ont., on Tuesday, Aug 24, 2021. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick
Justin Trudeau talks with reporters after taking part in a virtual G7 meeting on the crisis in Afghanistan virtually from Hamilton, Ont., on Tuesday, Aug 24, 2021. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick

The platform cost would add $70 billion to the federal debt over the next five years, but the Liberals say the debt-to-GDP ratio would be lower under this platform than was projected in last spring’s budget.

And Trudeau said Canada can afford the ambitious but responsible and concrete platform in an election where voters are facing a choice not just about what the next 18 months will look like, but the next 18 years.

“This is the plan that is going to bring Canadians forward to end this pandemic, to invest in growth, as we fight climate change and create jobs,” he said in Toronto on Wednesday.

“This is the plan that Canada needs to be even more ambitious, to draw all that we’ve learned in fighting this crisis of COVID, to apply it to the crisis of climate change of housing, of health care, of child care.”

The Liberals are the last major party to release their platform but the first to include full costing. Eleven of the items — major expenditures and revenue generators — were assessed by the parliamentary budget office, but because of time constraints, the PBO could not cost them all.

“This is a responsible and prudent plan that is fair. It’s also completely transparent,” Trudeau said.

He did not set a timeline for balancing the budget, however, despite being asked several times. He dismissed a Conservative promise to restore balance in a decade without service cuts as “magical thinking.”

In 2020 the Liberals banned the use, sale and importation of more than 1,500 models of what they consider assault-style weapons, with an amnesty until April 30, 2022, to give people time to comply.

Legislation introduced last February would have created a voluntary buyback program. The Liberal platform suggests that bill, which didn’t pass before the election was called, will be amended to make it mandatory for owners of the banned weapons to either sell them back to the government or have them rendered inoperable at federal expense.

The bill also would have given municipalities the power to ban handguns. The Liberals are now saying they would expand that authority to entire provinces and provide $1 billion to those that move to ban handguns in 2022.

Nathalie Provost, who survived the 1989 massacre at Montreal’s Ecole Polytechnique, welcomed the prospect of a strengthened gun ban bill. But she said the Liberals have promised tougher gun control in the past and failed to deliver.

“Indeed, two years ago we were in exactly the same situation. We enthusiastically applauded the Liberals for promising to ban assault weapons, including a buyback of all existing ones, only to be brutally disappointed with the end result,” Provost said in a statement through the group PolySeSouvient.

On abortion, the Liberals plan to leave no room for doubt it is a medically necessary procedure under the Canada Health Act, by including it in a regulation, much like they regulated the inclusion of diagnostic tests in 2018.

The latter was to respond to a Saskatchewan policy to allow MRIs in private clinics. The abortion issue directly goes at New Brunswick, which saw its health transfer payments clawed back by about $140,000 this year for charging fees for abortion at a private clinic.

The Liberals also plan to revoke the charitable status of organizations, often known as crisis pregnancy centres, which they say “provide dishonest counselling to women” about abortion rights and options available to them during pregnancy.

Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau reveals his party's election platform during the Canadian federal election in Toronto on Wednesday, September 1, 2021. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Nathan Denette
Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau reveals his party's election platform during the Canadian federal election in Toronto on Wednesday, September 1, 2021. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Nathan Denette

“There are many Canadians who have different perspectives on a large range of things,” said Trudeau. “Where we take issue is where there are organizations actively working, not just to promote their own views, but to limit the opportunities of women to make their own choices about their body.”

Some abortion rights advocates said they were cautiously optimistic about the Liberals’ promises on the issue, adding very few of the proposals brought forth by parties in the last federal election came to fruition.

“If the Liberals keep their promises, abortion access would be more strongly protected across Canada (including New Brunswick),” Tasia Alexopoulos, spokesperson for the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada’s New Brunswick chapter, said in an email.

The changes proposed in the platform would protect access to and coverage of abortions, and limit the intentional spread of misinformation and anti-abortion ideology, she said. “We hope to see similar platforms from any party claiming to be pro-choice in this election.”

Meanwhile, the anti-abortion group Campaign Life Coalition suggested the proposal on crisis pregnancy centres shows that Trudeau will cut off federal assistance for those who don’t share his beliefs. Matthew Wojciechowski, the group’s vice-president, also suggested the proposed change to the Canada Health Act would infringe on provincial jurisdiction regarding health care.

The platform also includes a promise to permanently end interest payments on federal student loans, introduce a new stand-alone national financial crimes agency, and add or extend tax credits for teachers, people who work at home and seniors who want to keep working after they turn 65.

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh suggested voters should be skeptical of the promises made by the Liberals.

“Why deliver on things when you can just campaign on it anyways? Why get things done when you can just promise it?” Singh said during a stop in Montreal.

O’Toole slammed the platform as containing recycled promises and some tweaks to a two-year budget, and lacking a complete plan for the country’s economic recovery.

“Mr. Trudeau called the election and just recycled some promises he’s already failed to deliver on from the previous election.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 1, 2021.

— With files from Allison Jones and Stephanie Taylor

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

A day on the campaign trail: Winnipeg's mayor, seeking a second term, does double duty

Malak Abas 12 minute read Preview

A day on the campaign trail: Winnipeg's mayor, seeking a second term, does double duty

Malak Abas 12 minute read Friday, Oct. 2, 2026

In the weeks leading up to the civic election, Scott Gillingham has been performing a juggling act: he’s running to be Winnipeg’s 45th mayor, while still serving as its 44th.

“If someone asks me about the campaign, I’m going to answer them. But I think for most people, I’m the mayor of Winnipeg, even if I’m showing up as a candidate,” Gillingham, 58, says. “I try to do all I can to maintain that distinction.”

The Free Press joined Gillingham on a recent rainy September Saturday on the campaign trail, where he served in both roles during an event-laden day. City council’s final meeting before the Oct. 28 election was days earlier.

In Winnipeg, it’s rare for an incumbent to be defeated. But Gillingham knows his win in 2022 wasn’t exactly a landslide — he won with 27.5 per cent of the vote — and he’s been thinking about his second term ever since.

Read
Friday, Oct. 2, 2026

’Disgusting’ posters being investigated by police

Morgan Modjeski 4 minute read Yesterday at 2:22 PM CDT

The Winnipeg Police Service major crimes unit is investigating what some have labelled offensive and hateful posters on full-display at a Winnipeg home.

One of the people irked by the display is Gracie Garrett. She’s has lived on Ashburn Street in Winnipeg’s Minto neighbourhood for almost ten years. She’s never felt unsafe in the neighbourhood before, but now, a set of posters plastered on a nearby house are making her feel uneasy.

The five signs, posted facing the street prominently on a front window, contain a slur, refer to Nazis as “heroes” and call Muslims, Christians and other groups “evil.”

Learning of the signs Friday, Garrett said she’ll be reporting the posters to police, as she worries they incite and promote violence.

Province looks to seize notorious drug den

Erik Pindera 5 minute read Preview

Province looks to seize notorious drug den

Erik Pindera 5 minute read Yesterday at 12:00 PM CDT

Provincial justice officials are trying to seize a Dominion Street drug den that has been the source of trouble in the West End for years.

The owner of 982 Dominion St., 45-year-old Robert Edward Johnson, was most recently arrested in June along with several others after a lengthy Winnipeg Police investigation into thefts and illicit drug sales connected to the house.

“The residence has a reputation within the neighbourhood as being a location where individuals habitually attend for the purpose of purchasing and/or consuming controlled substances,” reads a statement of claim filed by the province’s director of civil forfeiture in the Court of King’s Bench last week.

“For several years, the residence has been associated with criminal activity, violence, and disorder, resulting in numerous police attendances and complaints from members of the surrounding community.”

Read
Yesterday at 12:00 PM CDT

May be whiff of truth to ex’s odour ardour

Maureen Scurfield 5 minute read Yesterday at 2:01 AM CDT

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: I ran into an old boyfriend I used to curl on a team with, and we went for drinks. We’ve been almost eight years apart, and I couldn’t remember why we broke up, as we always had such a great time together.

It wasn’t until the second date — this time on a weekend — that it came back to me, with a jolt. Pee-yew! I remembered he doesn’t use deodorant on weekends. Why? He enjoys his own body odour. I recalled that a bit too late, and it was just as awful as ever! I went home early.

Tonight, he called and I refused him another date. I said, “Think back. You remember why we broke up?” Then he said, “Oh yeah, you hated my no-deodorant weekend policy. Well, guess what? Some women don’t mind!” I said I really doubted that, and that ended the conversation. Miss L., wouldn’t any women find stinky underarms offensive?

— Sensitive Nose, Fort Richmond

Creative powerhouse Perry Rosemond never lost Winnipeg roots

Ben Waldman 7 minute read Preview

Creative powerhouse Perry Rosemond never lost Winnipeg roots

Ben Waldman 7 minute read Yesterday at 6:00 AM CDT

He created King of Kensington, directed the troops in the Royal Canadian Air Farce, and his creative eye was behind the lens for television shows starring Johnny Cash, Tom Jones, Mr. Dress-Up and the Friendly Giant.

He also wrote and developed the Canadian version of Sesame Street during his time as the head of school and preschool programming for CBC in Toronto, and directed a televised special in 2002 for Winnipeg sketch comedy troupe Royal Liechtenstein Theatre Company.

But before his name featured in the credits of some of the most iconic and influential pieces of the Cancon canon, Perry Rosemond was an only child living in a crammed, multi-generational home in Winnipeg’s North End, racing each day to beat the morning bell next door at William Whyte School.

In memoirs that have yet to be published, the late television producer recalled his childhood. “(T)here were 14 of us in the house at 193 Andrews St., and it wasn’t that big of a house,” he writes.

Read
Yesterday at 6:00 AM CDT

Broadening prediction-market gambling a bad idea

Editorial 4 minute read Preview

Broadening prediction-market gambling a bad idea

Editorial 4 minute read Yesterday at 2:01 AM CDT

Let’s make a prediction: sooner or later, when Canadian governments find a way to take their own cut of the action, prediction-contract gambling on everything from sports to entertainment to political decisions is going to come to Canada.

And that’s a horrible, dangerous, pernicious idea.

Unless you have particular access to information — either inside information or strategic information based on skills or education — you’re not likely to make money at it. In fact, structurally, you’re likely to lose. In prediction markets, you basically pay an amount, plus fees from the company involved, to bet on whether something will or will not happen within a certain time frame. The amount you pay for your contract depends on how other people are also betting.

As Wealthsimple describes it, “You buy whichever side you think is right. Prices move with demand, so if the market leans towards one outcome, the more that side costs. If a lot of people are backing the TSX to finish above 38,000, yes gets more expensive and no gets cheaper.”

Read
Yesterday at 2:01 AM CDT