B.C. Court of Appeal allows mother to vaccinate kids for HPV against dad’s wishes
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Monthly Digital Subscription
$0 for the first 4 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*No charge for 4 weeks then price increases to the regular rate of $19.00 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
Monthly Digital Subscription
$4.75/week*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Billed as $19 plus GST every four weeks. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
*Your next subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $16.99 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $23.99 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 17/03/2025 (236 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
The B.C. Court of Appeal has denied a father’s bid to prevent his children getting vaccinated against the human papillomavirus.
The court ruling says the father applied in court early last year to stop the children’s mother from having them vaccinated, but a judge dismissed the bid and prohibited the father from “speaking to the children about the HPV vaccine.”
The father appealed, claiming the lower court judge ignored evidence about the vaccine’s risks, violated his freedom of expression and demonstrated bias “against him and his views about the dangers of the HPV vaccine.”
But a three-judge panel has dismissed the appeal, finding the original judge hadn’t “cherry-picked” evidence by giving preference to the mother’s submissions from Canadian public health authorities over the father’s material from U.S. lawsuits about vaccines.
The ruling also rejects the claim that the original judge showed bias by saying the father tried to “indoctrinate” the children by showing them “disturbing videos and telling them that the vaccine will kill them.”
The appeal ruling says the lower court judge correctly ruled in the “best interests of the children” by allowing the mother — who is separated from the father — to immunize the children when she deems appropriate.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published March 17, 2025.