X is a cesspool of misogyny, so why is anyone still on it?

Advertisement

Advertise with us

Why on earth are people still on X?

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Opinion

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 24/01/2026 (211 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Why on earth are people still on X?

The social media platform owned by Elon Musk plunged to horrible new depths earlier this month when Grok, a chatbot integrated within X, was used to produce sexual abuse imagery of women and children — an estimated three million sexualized images in less than two weeks, according to the U.K.’s Center for Countering Digital Hate, including 23,000 images appearing to show children.

This is it, right? This is when everyone abandons X? We all know by now that years of harassment and doxxing campaigns directed at women weren’t enough to sink the cursed app formerly known as Twitter, but surely AI-generated child sexual abuse images is the line, right?

The Associated Press Files
                                How bad does a social media platform need to get to make people log off forever?

The Associated Press Files

How bad does a social media platform need to get to make people log off forever?

No one should be on X in 2026. Certainly not Canadian politicians, and yet, still they remain.

In an interview with the Free Press about the role of X in public and political life in light of Grok, Manitoba Sen. Marilou McPhedran correctly called online abuse out as “highly profitable misogyny.”

But she still uses X, as do many other Manitoban and Canadian politicians.

“As odious as it often is to even go on X, I think it remains a primary communication tool,” McPhedran said. “As a parliamentarian, I’m looking at ways, first of all, to be on social media, be as open in communication and responsive as possible, and to call out, name and work against the exploitation.”

Respectfully, a primary communication tool for whom, exactly? Who is still using it, besides bots, ragebaiters and the creators of child sexual abuse images?

There’s nothing to save, nothing to make better. It’s a social media platform run by a billionaire who allows this stuff to happen. The decision to leave should be easy.

How bad does it need to get, exactly, to make people log off forever?

● ● ●

You know times are tough when people are nostalgic for 2016.

Shortly after the calendar flipped over to 2026, I saw an influx of social media posts on platforms that are not X celebrating what many consider the Last Good Year. At least until November, I guess.

I bristled when I saw these posts, thinking: Was it actually better in 2016 or were you just very young? Sure, it was pre-pandemic and (barely) pre-Trump, but take it from an elder millennial who was 31 in 2016: things were not as rose gold as those millennial pink walls on Instagram would have you believe.

It wasn’t so much the Last Good Year as it was the Beginning of the End.

The peachy millennial vibes that gen Z is craving via these nostalgia posts were already starting to curdle. We were imprisoned in skinny jeans. What’s become known as “Obama-era optimism” was already under threat; the toxicity of girlboss feminism and hustle culture was starting to show through the Glossier sheen. #MeToo was still a year away.

And, oh yeah, women were getting harassed on Twitter.

Recall that 2016 was also the year that people were so upset about the idea of a female Ghostbusters that star Leslie Jones was subject to a barrage of sexist, racist tweets. And that’s just a single example.

One of the greatest lies ever told was that anyone “needed” to be on Twitter “for work,” particularly people in public-facing fields such as politics and journalism. It was easy to be seduced by its promise — a town square, the world at your fingertips, a chance to swap pithy one-liners or share in a cultural moment.

Back then, Twitter was at its best and most fun during televised events such as awards shows, political debates, elections, a big season finale or the Olympics.

It feels vaguely embarrassing, now, how much stock we put into live-tweeting press conferences and slinging media gossip — mostly for the benefit of other journalists.

Even at its most popular, its usage was nowhere near that of Facebook or Instagram among the general public.

It’s incredible how much harassment and misogyny women put up with as being par for the course because we “needed” to be on Twitter, and how little was ever done about it. Yes, some people wanted to be there, but eventually the question became, for what?

And then Musk bought it 2022, and now it’s an unusable cesspool of slop, abuse and propaganda.

I held on to my account for far too long, tweeting links to my Free Press articles into the abyss and being harassed by men until, finally, I obliterated it for good last year.

I don’t miss it. I don’t even think about it.

It’s beyond time for everyone who is still on it to do the same.

winnipegfreepress.com/jenzoratti

Jen Zoratti

Jen Zoratti
Columnist

Jen Zoratti is a columnist and feature writer working in the Arts & Life department, as well as the author of the weekly newsletter NEXT. A National Newspaper Award finalist for arts and entertainment writing, Jen is a graduate of the Creative Communications program at RRC Polytech and was a music writer before joining the Free Press in 2013. Read more about Jen.

Every piece of reporting Jen produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print – part of the Free Press‘s tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press’s history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.

 

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

‘Strong sense of unity’

By Melissa Martin 6 minute read Preview

‘Strong sense of unity’

By Melissa Martin 6 minute read Yesterday at 5:14 PM CDT

Manitoba government and business leaders are rallying behind Prime Minister Mark Carney’s plan to fight back, after a sudden collapse of trade talks between the U.S. and Canada sparked a new salvo of U.S. tariffs on some Canadian goods.

On Saturday, after Carney vowed to respond with retaliatory tariffs, Manitoba premier Wab Kinew said his government stood “100 per cent” behind the prime minister’s plan to respond to what Kinew called U.S. president Donald Trump’s “unjustified and immoral” tariffs.

“History will not be kind to Donald Trump, so we should never appease him,” Kinew said. “We should fight back, which is what Canada is doing today.”

Kinew met reporters for a brief news conference at the legislature on Saturday afternoon, about an hour after finishing a call with Carney and the other premiers. There was a “really strong sense of unity” on that call, Kinew said, and emphasized that he backs the federal decision to “walk away from what would have been a bad deal.”

Read
Yesterday at 5:14 PM CDT

Quick quotes: Here’s what people are saying about the Canada-U.S. trade negotiations

Catherine Morrison and David Baxter, The Canadian Press 10 minute read Preview

Quick quotes: Here’s what people are saying about the Canada-U.S. trade negotiations

Catherine Morrison and David Baxter, The Canadian Press 10 minute read Updated: Yesterday at 8:04 PM CDT

OTTAWA - The United States imposed 50 per cent tariffs on billions of dollars worth of Canadian exports Saturday, after the two countries failed to reach a new trade deal before an extended deadline imposed by President Donald Trump earlier in the week.

In response, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced Canada will retaliate with matching dollar-for-dollar tariffs. Carney also suspended talks with the United States and summoned his negotiators back to Ottawa.

Here's what people are saying in response: 

——— 

Read
Updated: Yesterday at 8:04 PM CDT

Five Things: PM Carney explains why Canada left the U.S. negotiating table

David Baxter, The Canadian Press 5 minute read Preview

Five Things: PM Carney explains why Canada left the U.S. negotiating table

David Baxter, The Canadian Press 5 minute read Updated: Yesterday at 1:58 PM CDT

OTTAWA - Canada is preparing to hit the U.S. with dollar-for-dollar tariffs in response to new 50 per cent duties on $28 billion worth of Canadian products that took effect when talks between the two nations collapsed as negotiations neared the finish line. 

Prime Minister Mark Carney was quiet publicly during the final days of negotiations, but now has now explained his rationale for telling the Canadian negotiating team, led by Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc and chief negotiator Janice Charette, to leave the table.

Restrictions on further trade deals

"The U.S. Introduced at the last hours, in the last hours, efforts to restrict our ability to have other trade deals. You heard me say a moment ago, what we've accomplished in the past year, 20 new deals, economic and security partnerships, the prospect of doubling our market access because we believe in free trade. We're the partner of choice in many respects for countries around the world and the Americans wanted to restrict that. They had language that what they wanted to restrict that, unacceptable," Carney said during a press conference on Parliament Hill.

Read
Updated: Yesterday at 1:58 PM CDT

X is a cesspool of misogyny, so why is anyone still on it?

Jen Zoratti 5 minute read Preview

X is a cesspool of misogyny, so why is anyone still on it?

Jen Zoratti 5 minute read Saturday, Jan. 24, 2026

No one should be on X in 2026. Certainly not Canadian politicians, and yet, still they remain.

Read
Saturday, Jan. 24, 2026

Bombers offence stalls in 22-19 loss to Elks

Joshua Frey-Sam 7 minute read Preview

Bombers offence stalls in 22-19 loss to Elks

Joshua Frey-Sam 7 minute read Updated: Yesterday at 8:19 AM CDT

It was a microcosm of the Winnipeg Blue Bombers’ season to this point: a first half that burned bright only to be doused in cold water.

The Bombers began the first leg of their mid-season gauntlet with a 22-19 loss to the Edmonton Elks at Commonwealth Stadium in the Alberta capital on Friday night.

Elks quarterback Cody Fajardo orchestrated an eight-play, 54-yard drive that set up a 40-yard game-winning field goal by Vincent Blanchard that snuck inside the left upright with zeros on the clock.

The drive, which was plagued by poor tackling by the Bombers defence, came after Bombers kicker Sergio Castillo tied the game at 19-19 on a 53-yard boot with 1:41 remaining in the contest.

Read
Updated: Yesterday at 8:19 AM CDT

The good, bad and record setting performance in Bombers loss to Elks

Joshua Frey-Sam 7 minute read Preview

The good, bad and record setting performance in Bombers loss to Elks

Joshua Frey-Sam 7 minute read Yesterday at 6:50 PM CDT

The Winnipeg Blue Bombers’ 22-19 defeat at the hands of the Edmonton Elks at Commonwealth Stadium in Alberta on Friday was fitting for all the wrong reasons.

The Bombers looked reinvigorated as they jumped out to a 16-point lead in the first half. Then some bad habits reared their ugly head, as the Elks roared back with 19 straight points before kicker Vincent Blanchard walked it off with a 40-yard field goal.

A night that began with so much promise left many fans to wonder what the ceiling actually is for this team in 2026.

On offence, Zach Collaros completed 19 of 30 passes for 219 yards, one touchdown and an interception; Brady Oliveira amassed 118 yards on 16 carries and added a pair of catches for 11 yards; and Nic Demski secured five grabs for 80 yards.

Read
Yesterday at 6:50 PM CDT