No utility privatization without referendum: Winnipeg mayor, speaker
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Digital Subscription
One year of digital access for only $205*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 17/07/2009 (6210 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
WINNIPEG – Council speaker Harry Lazarenko and Mayor Sam Katz have authored a council motion intended to allay public concern about Winnipeg’s proposed utility.
The Mynarski councillor and the mayor will ask city councillors on Wednesday to approve a resolution that states Winnipeg can never sell or privatize a municipal utility without a binding public referendum.
The motion comes as some members of the public claim the city’s proposed water, sewer and power utility amounts to privatization.
The utility is intended to assume control for water treatment, sewage treatment, garbage and recycling collection and may also produce green energy. It may also extend sewage-treatment services to neighbouring municipalities.
The most contentious aspect of the utility proposal is the possibility of entering into a partnership with a private engineering firm to complete up to $1 billion worth of sewage-plant upgrades and combined-sewer replacements.
Katz has promised to amend the utility business plan to clear up uncertainty over the proposal. But Couns. John Orlikow (River Heights) and Jenny Gerbasi (Fort Rouge) have authored a motion to delay the vote until September.