Trio convicted in 2006 killing

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 25/02/2010 (6019 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

WINNIPEG – Three men have been convicted by a jury for their roles in a deadly stabbing outside a downtown Winnipeg bar.

Glen Sherman Monkman was found guilty of second-degree murder, while co-accused Norris Ponce and Carlos Tavares were found guilty of manslaughter. They had originally been charged with first-degree murder. The trio will be sentenced March 4.

Jurors began deliberations Thursday afternoon and reached their verdict around 1 p.m. Friday

Ming Hong Huynh, 24, was knifed outside Club Desire on Bannatyne Avenue in April 2006.

The key issue was whether they believed the testimony of the Crown’s star witness, Danny Simao, who claims he overheard a plan to kill Huynh while inside a car with the three accused,

Monkman’s lawyer, Jeff Nichols, claims Simao is a "100 per cent untrustworthy" witness whose evidence should be rejected.

Simao lives in Ontario but was visiting his cousin, Tavares, and partying with the accused on the night of the fatal stabbing, court was told. He claims the three men discussed an attack on Huynh before the group’s arrival outside Club Desire, and then dumped the murder weapon in a river after they fled the stabbing.

No murder weapon was ever recovered. The Crown argued the accused planned the attack on Huynh as revenge for another stabbing that happened at a wedding social in March 2006.

Monkman has admitted stabbing Huynh four times in the chest and cheek with a small knife while horrified bystanders watched but claims he should only be found guilty of manslaughter based on the fact he was provoked.

Ponce is accused of distracting Huynh on the street before Monkman stabbed him. Tavares is accused of driving a getaway car, a cream-coloured Lincoln Navigator, away from the stabbing. Lawyers for both say there is no credible evidence linking them to the attack and they should be acquitted entirely.

Defence lawyers said Simao has changed his story repeatedly about what he saw and heard the night of the stabbing. They say Simao’s bizarre behaviour in court – which included repeated bouts of vomiting and retching – are a good indicator he was lying.

"Someone who was providing honest and credible evidence wouldn’t react like that," Ponce’s lawyer, Ian Garber, said Tuesday in his final submission to the jury. "You don’t get any points for being sick and throwing up."

Crown attorney Carla Dewar told jurors Simao’s illness throughout more than two weeks of testimony is due to pre-existing health conditions, including irritable bowel syndrome and a bleeding ulcer.

"You can see the toll it took on him," Dewar said this week in her closing arguments. She claims the accused hatched a plan to hurt Huynh that was "executed perfectly."
"I urge you to make sure they don’t get away with (murder)," she said. Dewar said there are multiple sources of evidence to suggest the men were connected to the attack, like the
Lincoln Navigator rented by Tavares and eyewitness accounts of the stabbing. Police later traced the Lincoln Navigator to a Selkirk Avenue garage, and forensic tests traced Monkman’s blood to the inside of the vehicle.

Before the attack, court heard Huynh was wandering around shirtless outside the club. His girlfriend, Angie Pfeifer, testified Huynh used steroids and cocaine. The Red River College business administration student was intoxicated and looking to fight when he got into a fight with an Asian man alleged to be Ponce.