‘A closed mind’ on the bench?

Federal Court took Vic Toews to judicial woodshed


Advertise with us

As Canada's public safety minister, Vic Toews was criticized over and over by Federal Court judges for sidestepping evidence, failing to offer detailed decisions and displaying close-minded intransigence when dealing with the charter rights of Canadian citizens incarcerated abroad.

Read this article for free:


Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe with this special offer:

All-Access Digital Subscription

$1.50 for 150 days*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Pay $1.50 for the first 22 weeks of your subscription. After 22 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.00 per month. GST will be added to each payment. Subscription can be cancelled after the first 22 weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 13/03/2014 (3187 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

As Canada’s public safety minister, Vic Toews was criticized over and over by Federal Court judges for sidestepping evidence, failing to offer detailed decisions and displaying close-minded intransigence when dealing with the charter rights of Canadian citizens incarcerated abroad.

In at least 11 cases heard in Federal Court, decisions made by Toews, Manitoba’s newest Court of Queen’s Bench justice, were overruled, found unreasonable and inconsistent with the facts.

“Given the rulings of the Federal Court, it raises serious concerns about his judicial temperament, certainly regarding offenders in criminal cases,” said Ottawa lawyer Yavar Hameed, who challenged several of Toews’ decisions.

Adrian Wyld / The Canadian Press files Vic Toews

Last week, Toews was appointed to Manitoba’s Court of Queen’s Bench. Long rumoured to be eyeing a judicial appointment, he was Canada’s public safety minister for more than three years before stepping down last summer.

While in the post, Toews was repeatedly asked to decide right-of-return cases, where Canadians in prison abroad sought to exercise their charter right to serve part of their sentence in Canada. Those cases typically involved major drug charges, and in many, Toews relied on suspicion — often contradicted by evidence — the offender was linked to organized crime as a reason to deny the right of return. Many prisoners appealed to Federal Court, where judges overruled Toews’ decision in at least 11 cases reviewed by the Winnipeg Free Press.

Hameed was a lawyer involved in one of the most recent and most convoluted cases. It involved Yves LeBon, a Montreal man convicted in 2008 of drug charges after police in Illinois found 119 kilograms of cocaine in his vehicle. Shortly after his conviction, LeBon applied to serve the remainder of his 10-year sentence in Canada, a move Corrections Canada supported.

Toews rejected LeBon’s request, even though LeBon met all the criteria in federal legislation. LeBon had a strong support network in Canada, admitted his guilt and posed no safety risk. The Federal Court of Appeal found Toews’ decision was not “justified, transparent and intelligible” and ordered him to reconsider LeBon’s application.

Toews did, and again denied the request, saying LeBon was likely to commit an organized-crime offence if he returned to Canada. LeBon again appealed to Federal Court, which again ruled Toews’ decision was unreasonable.

In a biting decision, Justice Luc Martineau said Toews “only paid lip-service” to the court’s previous findings and just reworded his original decision, “which falls woefully short of being reasonable.”

“A reasonably informed person would have the clear impression that the minister, in denying the applicant’s transfer request, simply wanted to punish him because he was caught transporting a large quantity of drugs and did not provide the names of his accomplices,” Martineau wrote. “This illustrates an intransigency which is symptomatic of a closed mind and leads to the conclusion that a reasonable apprehension of bias existed on the part of the minister… I agree with the applicant that the considerations raised by the minister are spurious, illogical, speculative and not evidence-based.”

In an unusual and precedent-setting move, Martineau ordered Toews to repatriate LeBon within 45 days. The Federal Court of Appeal upheld that order.

It took more than four years, but LeBon is now serving his sentence in Canada.

Hameed, who was involved in about 10 similar right-of-return appeals, called Toews’ approach to the LeBon case and others “whimsical.”

“He had an obligation to follow the law and follow the courts, but he did neither,” Hameed said. “There was a pattern of unreasonable and close-minded decisions that glossed over evidence while he was minister.”

For similar reasons, the Federal Court also overturned Toews’ decision in the case of Sunny Yu, a Canadian student at Hawaii Pacific University, convicted in 2005 for importing four kilograms of methamphetamine into the United States. The Federal Court also overturned Toews’ right-of-return decision in the case of Tomaso Villano, sentenced to four-and-a-half years for importing 100,000 ecstasy pills into the United States.

Vancouver lawyer John Conroy has represented roughly 20 right-of-return applicants in Federal Court in recent years, including Yu and Villano. He said Toews’ decisions to deny applications were often found unreasonable by federal judges. Politics likely played a significant role in Toews’ decisions, but Conroy said he’s hopeful that will change when Toews takes his place on the bench.

“One hopes that, in his judicial persona, he finds a way to be judicial, to consider all sides and ensure fairness,” said Conroy.

Toews declined to comment Wednesday.

“Judges are limited in their ability to respond to inquiries related to a number of subjects, including opinions on matters related to government, their work before becoming judges and on matters that could become the subject of legal challenge,” a spokeswoman for Manitoba Courts said.


Report Error Submit a Tip


Advertise With Us