Tories back away from $122M savings figure


Advertise with us

The provincial government has identified more than $100 million in budgetary savings after more than a week of pressure to back up its fiscal claims.

Read this article for free:


Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe with this special offer:

All-Access Digital Subscription

$1.50 for 150 days*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Pay $1.50 for the first 22 weeks of your subscription. After 22 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.00 per month. GST will be added to each payment. Subscription can be cancelled after the first 22 weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 09/06/2016 (2263 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

The provincial government has identified more than $100 million in budgetary savings after more than a week of pressure to back up its fiscal claims.

Late Thursday, the Progressive Conservatives issued a statement listing savings, totalling $108 million, in six categories, with a promise of more to come.

During the day, the government backed away from its insistence, since budget day May 31, that it had found $122 million in budgetary savings. That spawned repeated demands by the Opposition NDP and the media that the government produce an itemized list.

MIKE DEAL / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS FILES Premier Brian Pallister has promised to explain where his government found $122 million in savings.

The government now acknowledges that the $122-million figure represents the difference between two core government deficit projections: the $1.012 billion deficit run up last year by the NDP (according to the province’s latest estimate) and the $890 million core deficit the Tories predict their government will incur this year.

Premier Brian Pallister said after the list was released that what is important is that the PCs are bringing “a change in attitude” about the need for government to live within its means. He said the province must hold annual total spending increases to “below three per cent.”

“We are committed to achieving the outcomes that we described in our budget documents, and we are going to institute the practices of discipline that are necessary to achieve those,” he said.

The list of spending reduction measures includes some the government has previously provided and some new items.

It includes a $4-million saving associated with reducing the size of cabinet, and $44 million from limiting the seniors school tax rebate to those with a net family income below $40,000.

New to the list is the elimination of $35 million in discretionary spending contained in past provincial budgets, a reduction in increases to schools and universities ($9 million), and reductions in amortization costs due to project delays, including infrastructure projects.

NDP finance critic James Allum said it’s no wonder the government has backed away from its claim of having found $122 million in savings.

“It’s not surprising to us that they would move off what is essentially a bogus number in the first place,” he said.

In reviewing the list provided late Thursday afternoon, Allum said it seems the Tories are targeting seniors, education, infrastructure and prevention programs.

“They’re starting to finally come clean about their priorities for Manitobans, and they’re not good priorities,” he said.

Earlier in the day, the premier and his finance minister, Cameron Friesen, faced repeated demands for an accounting of their projected savings.

At a morning legislative committee meeting to discuss the budget, Pallister promised the government would produce an itemized list “later on.”

In a mid-afternoon scrum with reporters following question period, the premier signalled the PC government was moving away from the $122-million figure.

“What the ($122 million) number is the difference between our totals…” Pallister said, referring to estimated operating deficits for the current year vs. last year. “The breakdown of how you get there is very complicated,” he added. “It’s hard work and it involves going through literally thousands of spending proposals…”

Pallister also noted that the heated debate over how much the government plans to save is a marked departure from the past.

“I don’t recall having this discussion. Do you?” he told reporters.


Larry Kusch

Larry Kusch
Legislature reporter

Larry Kusch didn’t know what he wanted to do with his life until he attended a high school newspaper editor’s workshop in Regina in the summer of 1969 and listened to a university student speak glowingly about the journalism program at Carleton University in Ottawa.


Updated on Thursday, June 9, 2016 7:59 PM CDT: Updates with writethru

Updated on Thursday, June 9, 2016 9:31 PM CDT: Updates headline.

Report Error Submit a Tip


Advertise With Us