WEATHER ALERT

Dakota First Nations offered cut of gaming revenue

Advertisement

Advertise with us

SIOUX VALLEY DAKOTA NATION — The Manitoba government has offered several Dakota First Nations a cut of gaming revenue on the condition they do not pursue casino projects, the Brandon Sun has learned.

Read this article for free:

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Monthly Digital Subscription

$1 per week for 24 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $4.00 plus GST every four weeks. After 24 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.00 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

Monthly Digital Subscription

$4.75/week*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $19 plus GST every four weeks. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Winnipeg Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

No thanks

*$1 will be added to your next bill. After your 4 weeks access is complete your rate will increase by $0.00 a X percent off the regular rate.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 26/09/2024 (373 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

SIOUX VALLEY DAKOTA NATION — The Manitoba government has offered several Dakota First Nations a cut of gaming revenue on the condition they do not pursue casino projects, the Brandon Sun has learned.

The chiefs of Sioux Valley, Dakota Tipi and Canupawakpa said Premier Wab Kinew pitched a revenue-sharing agreement at a meeting in Winnipeg Aug. 21.

“He offered a percentage of all the gaming revenues,” said Dakota Tipi Chief Dennis Pashe. “It’s negotiable, so we have to get into the negotiation details. It was just his initial offer.”

Sioux Valley Dakota Nation Chief Vince Tacan, seen here standing in a board room at the community band office on Sept. 16, says Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew has offered Dakota First Nations a share of provincial gaming revenue if they commit to ending any pursuit of building a casino in Manitoba. (Matt Goerzen/The Brandon Sun)

Sioux Valley Dakota Nation Chief Vince Tacan, seen here standing in a board room at the community band office on Sept. 16, says Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew has offered Dakota First Nations a share of provincial gaming revenue if they commit to ending any pursuit of building a casino in Manitoba. (Matt Goerzen/The Brandon Sun)

“He was trying to offer us a… revenue share,” Canupawakpa Chief Raymond Brown confirmed.

Earlier this year, Brown and Sioux Valley Chief Vince Tacan signed an agreement with Chief Don Smoke of the Dakota Plains First Nation to build a casino in western Manitoba on land owned by Sioux Valley.

The agreement was struck months after Kinew said he was open to considering more First Nations-run casinos and the government instructed the Manitoba Liquor and Lotteries board to lift its pause on gaming expansion.

At the Aug. 21 meeting, the premier said he wasn’t interested in more casinos being developed, the chiefs told the Sun.

“We got to the meeting,” Tacan said in the boardroom of the community government office at Sioux Valley, “and basically the premier took over the meeting and said, ‘Yeah, thanks for coming. And I made a decision, and no casinos for anyone, no new casinos.’

“Right off the hop, he says he’s not allowing (any) more casinos in Manitoba,” said Brown. “He’s not going to allow us to build a casino and run a casino.”

Instead, the premier proposed a revenue-sharing agreement to follow through with his goal of economic reconciliation with First Nations.

Tacan and Brown said the premier said his concerns about adding casinos were based on the negative effects, such as addiction.

The premier’s office did not respond to questions about the meeting but sent an emailed statement.

“Our government continues to engage with First Nation partners including supporting economic reconciliation and local economic development,” the statement said.

Brandon MLA Glen Simard, the minister responsible for Manitoba Liquor and Lotteries, wouldn’t comment on the chiefs’ claims because he said closed-door conversations should remain confidential.

“That’s where that process should stay,” he said.

Tacan said no documents or paper were provided at the August meeting, but the initial pitch was in the hundreds of thousands each year.

“It was to be $2 million split between five communities, which was like $400,000 each,” he told the Sun. “So what the hell can you do with $400,000? You can’t even build a decent house with $400,000.”

Casinos, lottery, online gaming and video lottery terminals raked in $390 million in income for the province last year, as per the latest annual report for Manitoba Liquor and Lotteries. That income pays for health care, education, social services, housing and infrastructure.

Tacan said he was not impressed by Kinew’s proposal. He said he’d rather build a casino or expand a gaming centre to give people jobs.

“I made it known that I didn’t agree with it. I said that the perception is our people get money for nothing — right? — and that we like to stay home and do nothing and get money. I said, ‘We want to work.’”

However, Pashe said it’s an option if the terms are agreeable.

“I think it’s OK to accept it. (Casinos are) kind of a diluted market,” said Pashe. “You look around at all the casinos surrounding us.” There’s competition, he said, and it could be “a 20-year losing money proposition,” along with the possibility of facing legal battles with the province.

“We don’t really have to put up any capital. (We) get a revenue-sharing agreement and take it to the bank with a whole lot less headache.”

He called it an acceptable form of economic reconciliation.

A follow-up meeting is expected as early as next month.

— with files from Matt Goerzen

— Brandon Sun

History

Updated on Thursday, September 26, 2024 6:27 AM CDT: Adds photo

Report Error Submit a Tip

Local

LOAD MORE