Top court agrees to hear province’s appeal against man acquitted in Derksen case

Advertisement

Advertise with us

Manitoba’s highest court has granted the province the right to appeal a 2024 decision that ruled the man acquitted of killing Candace Derksen after spending a decade behind bars could continue to sue the provincial government and City of Winnipeg.

Read this article for free:

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Monthly Digital Subscription

$1 per week for 24 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $4.00 plus GST every four weeks. After 24 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.00 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

Monthly Digital Subscription

$4.75/week*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $19 plus GST every four weeks. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

No thanks

*Your next subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $16.99 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $23.99 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 27/01/2025 (267 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Manitoba’s highest court has granted the province the right to appeal a 2024 decision that ruled the man acquitted of killing Candace Derksen after spending a decade behind bars could continue to sue the provincial government and City of Winnipeg.

Mark Grant’s lawyers first filed the lawsuit in 2019, seeking $8.5 million for wrongful conviction and imprisonment from the province, its attorney general and the City of Winnipeg. The statement of claim has been amended twice.

The province has twice moved to have his claim struck in the Court of King’s Bench, first filing a motion alleging it fails to disclose a reasonable cause of action or is an abuse of process, which was ruled against in 2023, before it again sought to strike the claim under the same grounds in 2024.

A police video screen capture shows Mark Grant being interviewed in the 1984 killing of Candace Derksen. Grant was found guilty but was later acquitted when a Queen’s Bench (now King’s Bench) judge determined the DNA evidence was unreliable and had no value. (Supplied)
A police video screen capture shows Mark Grant being interviewed in the 1984 killing of Candace Derksen. Grant was found guilty but was later acquitted when a Queen’s Bench (now King’s Bench) judge determined the DNA evidence was unreliable and had no value. (Supplied)

A decision last year by a King’s Bench judge ruled some of the issues raised by Grant’s suit, including DNA evidence, should be put to a civil court judge. The judge struck out other portions of the claim.

Provincial government lawyers then filed a motion to appeal the 2024 decision in the Court of Appeal. Court of Appeal Justice Marc Monnin, in a written decision issued Friday, granted the latest provincial government motion.

The province argued Grant’s lawsuit is seeking to re-litigate a legal issue and is therefore an abuse of process. That issue is that the appeal court previously found DNA evidence sufficient enough for the province to base its decision to prosecute Grant in his first trial — though the evidence was eventually ruled unreliable at his second trial in a lower court.

The province argued Grant’s allegations that the government lacked reasonable and probable cause to prosecute him can’t be proved as they’re inconsistent with the appeal court’s prior findings.

“I am satisfied that the grounds of appeal raised by the provincial defendants are of sufficient importance to merit the attention of a full panel of this court,” said Monnin.

“The issue of whether there is a reasonable cause of action is an issue that can determine the outcome of the proceedings and bring it to an early conclusion without the necessity of what will likely be a long, drawn-out trial.”

A panel of three Court of Appeal justices will hear the province’s full arguments at a later date.

Derksen, 13, disappeared while walking home from school to her Elmwood residence on Nov. 30, 1984.

Candace Derksen, 13, disappeared while walking home from school to her Elmwood residence on Nov. 30, 1984. (Supplied)
Candace Derksen, 13, disappeared while walking home from school to her Elmwood residence on Nov. 30, 1984. (Supplied)

Despite an intensive search, it was six weeks before Derksen’s frozen and bound body was found inside an industrial storage shed on the other side of the Nairn Avenue overpass from her route home.

No one was arrested for decades, but in 2007, Winnipeg police arrested Grant, saying his DNA was found on twine used to bind Derksen’s limbs.

Grant was found guilty of second-degree murder, but the Manitoba Court of Appeal ordered a new trial partly due to shortcomings of the DNA evidence.

Manitoba Justice appealed that decision to the Supreme Court, but the country’s highest court upheld the order for a new trial.

In 2017, Grant was acquitted when a Queen’s Bench (now King’s Bench) judge determined the DNA evidence was unreliable and had no value.

erik.pindera@freepress.mb.ca

Erik Pindera

Erik Pindera
Reporter

Erik Pindera is a reporter for the Free Press, mostly focusing on crime and justice. The born-and-bred Winnipegger attended Red River College Polytechnic, wrote for the community newspaper in Kenora, Ont. and reported on television and radio in Winnipeg before joining the Free Press in 2020.  Read more about Erik.

Every piece of reporting Erik produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press‘s tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press’s history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

Local

LOAD MORE