Clarity key in estate planning
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Monthly Digital Subscription
$1 per week for 24 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Billed as $4.00 plus GST every four weeks. After 24 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.00 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
Monthly Digital Subscription
$4.75/week*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Billed as $19 plus GST every four weeks. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
*Your next subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $16.99 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $23.99 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 23/11/2024 (336 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
It’s a result of my age, I suppose. I guess we will all go through it …
Unfortunately, we’ve been helping a lot of people go through the complex process of settling estates lately. Most have gone as smoothly as possible, thanks to previous clear instructions from the deceased.
However, combined with the Canada Revenue Agency kerfuffle over the last couple of years regarding “bare trusts” and increasing litigation over joint accounts with parents, I decided it was time for a refresher on prudent estate planning.
Personal, recent news of two different friends dying added a bit of urgency and personal touch to that decision.
Joint accounts with parents, spoiler alert: testamentary intention should always be made in writing (ideally with professional advice) and properly witnessed.
It is common for an adult child to be added as joint holder of a bank or investment account with an aging parent. This allows the child to help manage the funds, perhaps provide signatures or bank visits when necessary and, ultimately, to make the estate settlement process simpler.
With a joint account with right of survivorship, the asset immediately becomes property of the survivor when one of the people dies. This avoids the requirement for probate for these assets and makes funds immediately available to the survivor, rather than waiting until the estate is settled.
The same holds true for joint ownership of a house or other real estate.
This works fine when there is only one child in the family, but what if there are two or more children?
What was mom’s (for example) intent with that money? If a bank account, investment account or house is a major asset of the estate — and it’s now in the hands of one of the children — how do the others feel?
If mom had failed to make her testamentary intention clear, then such an arrangement is likely to end up in court.
On the other hand, if mom had received legal advice independent of the receiving child — and had clearly stated in writing it was her intent for the child with joint title to inherit that money separate from the estate — then the other children have no legal grounds.
If, on the other hand, mom had stated clearly those assets were to be included in her estate and divided among all her children under the instructions in her will, that’s also very clear legally.
The exact same logic and advice applies to gifts made by the elderly parent to one child and not to others. Was this a pure gift over and above that child’s inheritance? Or was it instead meant as a pre-inheritance and part of that child’s share of the estate?
In the absence of clear written instructions, courts will determine the money is actually held in trust by that child for the estate.
This was determined by the Supreme Court in 2007 in a famous case called Pecore v. Pecore. The gift is presumed to be a “resulting trust,” unless the recipient child can prove the parent intended to benefit them and not the estate.
A 2023 Ontario court case determined essentially the same thing in the case of a joint bank account.
As with everything in life, make your intentions clear and unequivocal, with no room for ambiguity. In the case of financial or legal items, do it in writing and let the other children know what you’re doing and your intent.
Get everything on the table and clear now, to avoid any portion of the estate going to legal fees and, most importantly, to keep your family together after you die.
Dollars and Sense is meant as an introduction to this topic and should not in any way be construed as a replacement for personalized
professional advice. Please consult legal, tax, insurance and
investment experts for advice on your unique situation.
David Christianson, BA, CFP, R.F.P., TEP, CIM, is recipient of the FP Canada Fellow (FCFP) Distinction. He is a senior wealth adviser and portfolio manager with Christianson Wealth Advisors at National Bank Financial Wealth Management, and author of the book: Managing the Bull, a No-Nonsense Guide to Personal Finance
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.