Alberta separatism talk goes too far in B.C., but some concerns get sympathy

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 06/05/2025 (216 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

VANCOUVER – Politicians and business leaders in British Columbia say talk of separation in Alberta is an opening for better co-operation between Ottawa and Western provinces, but dividing the country is a step too far.

The reactions come after Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said this week that she would put the issue to a referendum if enough residents sign a petition in support, even if she doesn’t want Alberta to leave Canada.

B.C. Opposition Leader John Rustad says he understands the frustration and it’s an opportunity for Prime Minister Mark Carney “to step up to the plate” and for the federal government to “unleash the potential of provinces.”

B.C. Premier David Eby said last month the idea of Western separatism was a “waste of time” when the country needs to work together against tariff threats of U.S. President Donald Trump.

However, the Business Council of British Columbia says “Alberta’s concerns around policies like emissions caps on oil and gas must be taken seriously.”

While the BC Chamber of Commerce wouldn’t comment on Alberta separation, it did push for the “importance of removing unnecessary interprovincial trade barriers and the need to have a single, seamless market in Canada.”

“The BC Chamber of Commerce is focused on critical issues that will unlock the economic potential for British Columbia and Canada,” says chamber CEO Fiona Famulak in a statement. 

“Foremost is the need for the federal government and provincial governments to work collaboratively and create a single market in our country, where businesses and consumers can buy and sell products without onerous interprovincial restrictions impeding productivity and growth.”

Business Council of B.C. CEO Laura Jones says we need a strong economy, not a fractured country.

“When Alberta thrives, Canada thrives,” she says. “The reality is that implementing an emissions cap risks undermining affordability, reconciliation, and trade diversification.”

Industry experts and researchers say separation wouldn’t be a helpful solution to a landlocked province like Alberta needing more access to outside markets. 

“The idea of Alberta becoming a separate nation, what would it do other than to create barriers between it and other provinces?” says University of British Columbia-Okanagan associate professor of economics Ross Hickey.

“I don’t know what Alberta’s situation would be fiscally if it weren’t for the flow of capital from outside of the province into the province, and the flow of labour from outside the province in the province. The oil does not extract itself.”

B.C. Trucking Association president Dave Earle says Alberta separatism has long, historic roots — and the reasons for its re-emergence should not be dismissed.

“I don’t think Canadians really understand the level of dissatisfaction and upset that exists there,” Earle says. “And that’s something we have to find a way both to honour … and really hear what Albertans have to say.”

But Earle adds that he isn’t worried about a hypothetical separation isolating B.C., where most roads and land links to other parts of Canada go through Alberta.

He says the North American land transport system is fully integrated, and Alberta will continue to need the goods being brought in from other jurisdictions through that system — necessitating the routes to stay open and accessible.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 6, 2025.