Federal food agency ruling says two West Bank wines are not a ‘Product of Israel’
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Digital Subscription
One year of digital access for only $205*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 15/05/2022 (1602 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
OTTAWA – The federal food inspection agency says two wines produced in the West Bank and sold in Ontario were falsely branded “Product of Israel,” given the lack of clarifying information on the labels.
The new determination from the Canadian Food Inspection Agency is the latest twist in a politically tinged case that began five years ago.
In 2017, David Kattenburg, then a resident of Winnipeg, filed a complaint with the agency about two wines made in the West Bank settlements of Psagot and Shiloh. He argued they should not be deemed products of Israel under Canadian law because they were from Israeli settlements in the occupied territories.
The agency initially sided with Kattenburg but reversed its decision after Global Affairs Canada noted the West Bank was included under the Canada-Israel free trade agreement.
In 2019, a Federal Court judge found the settlements were not part of the State of Israel and the labelling was therefore “inaccurate and misleading.”
The judge sent the matter back to the food inspection agency, a course of action upheld last year by the Federal Court of Appeal.
In its latest determination, dated Friday, the inspection agency says the wines were not produced within the internationally recognized boundaries of Israel, and their labels do not mention they were made in an area of the West Bank administered by the Israeli state.
As a result, the labelling is “false” and therefore runs afoul of provisions of the Food and Drugs Act and the Safe Food for Canadians Act.
However, the food inspection agency says it lacks a mandate to suggest accurate wording or to approve labels.
Instead, the agency intends to hold a consultation later this year with interested parties on an acceptable declaration of origin in this case and similar circumstances.
In a joint blog post, Kattenburg and his lawyer, Dimitri Lascaris, welcomed the agency’s redetermination and suggested the labels on the wines in question should read “Product of West Bank (Israeli settlement).”
“We are hopeful that, once importers of Israeli settlement products adapt to the new ruling, the CFIA will take steps to ensure that the labels on these products contain all material information that Canadian consumers require in order to make informed purchasing decisions,” their statement reads.
Kattenburg, who now lives in the Netherlands, said Sunday in an interview he plans to participate in the inspection agency’s coming consultation by “arguing that labels have to be absolutely explicit.”
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 15, 2022.