July 13, 2020

19° C, A few clouds

Full Forecast

Close this


Advertise With Us


Climate change creates risky environment

Environment a prominent factor in monetary risk assessment

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 23/2/2019 (506 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Stormy weather lies ahead.

That’s not a forecast for a blizzard or deluge, but a prediction for your investments.

The bankruptcy filing last month by a U.S. utility company — Pacific Gas and Electric Corp. (PG&E) — points to trouble ahead as the effects of climate change start to pile up.

The California power company faces tens of billions of dollars in liability claims for its alleged role in sparking massive wildfires, including one in November that burned down Paradise — a once-scenic woodland city of about 25,000 residents.

Although massive blazes incinerating large swaths of land and communities are now commonplace — because of a hotter planet — what’s different is this wildfire drove a major publicly traded company to insolvency.

And it’s a utility company of all things — a class of investments often considered to be well-positioned as climate change deepens, because these firms are at the forefront of energy efficiency and renewables. What’s more, PG&E, like so many utility companies, was considered a steady investment. It paid a good dividend, which made it ideal for income-needy boomers.

Yet those familiar with the risks climate change poses to financial markets say we should expect more of the same or worse over the coming years.

Mike Thiessen, vice-president of sustainable research at Genus Capital in Vancouver, says what happened to PG&E further illustrates how markets have been slow to put a price on climate-change risks.

Even though most investors may not have seen it coming, PG&E "had a very high risk because it was operating in California, where there has been a drought for about a decade," he says.

What’s more, the company was not as diligent as others in mitigating risks. And its perceived mismanagement has now opened it up to lawsuits, Thiessen says.

California law has also played a role in the company’s troubles.

We should expect the rules to become more stringent elsewhere, including Canada, as the effects of a warming planet become more burdensome.

More than ever, investors need to pay attention to what was once considered a niche segment of investing. If you’re not viewing your investments through an environmental, social and governance (ESG) lens, your money is more at risk than you probably realize, he adds.

While environmental risk is top of mind for many investors, all three considerations are deeply connected, because what’s good for society and corporate governance is now often equally so for the planet. And it’s often average people driving the movement, asking advisers about these investment options, says Fred Pinto, head of asset management with NEI Investments, one of Canada’s leading investment firms specializing in ESG.

"I would say many investors are further along in their appreciation of the issues than the advisory industry."

Yet more advisers are now going green, too, including certified financial planner MaryAnn Kokan-Nyhof with Desjardins Financial Security Investments. The Winnipeg financial adviser increasingly found herself fielding questions from clients about the effects of climate change on their investments. So, she started offering ESG-focused strategies a few years ago.

And she urges other advisers to consider doing the same. Or they should at least start up discussions with clients on the subject because "sadly, many investors are not yet aware of the options."

What shouldn’t be part of the discussion is that investing with the environment in mind will cost you returns in your portfolio, Pinto says.

"Are we seeing better returns now with ESG than without it?" he says.

"To be honest, that is hard to prove. But there is lots of research out there that shows the returns are just as good."

More and more, however, an argument can be made that investing in a company which isn’t incorporating ESG considerations into its operations is more risky than investing in one that is, he says. Taking this notion a bit further, what happened to PG&E could happen to companies in our portfolios.

Certainly, Thiessen believes this is a risk in the future, especially for Canadians, with our bias toward oil and gas companies in our portfolios.

"Because communities and governments see increasingly what climate change is doing, they’re going to want to regulate carbon even more," Thiessen says.

Struggling oil and gas companies could be even more challenged to turn a profit. They even face the prospect of holding stranded assets, a situation in which developing and bringing these resources to market becomes too costly to be competitive.

"The oilsands and arctic drilling are at the very top of this list when it comes to this risk," Thiessen says.

This is unlikely to happen soon, he adds. Our reliance on hydrocarbon energy is not going away just yet. But we have already seen how technology can quickly disrupt the industry. Most recently, advances in hydraulic fracturing have opened up access to sources of oil and gas previously thought unviable. And that has created more competition for Canadian oilsands, pushing down prices and helping send the industry into a slump. Additionally, advances regarding renewables will only further change the paradigm for energy.

Then again, as PG&E’s recent history demonstrates, it’s not just oil and gas companies people should worry about, but any firm not taking climate change seriously.

"ESG considerations just aren’t the nice thing to do anymore," Thiessen says.

"They’re something that you have to do."


Advertise With Us

Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.

To those who have made donations, thank you.

To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.

The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.

After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.

If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.

We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.

The Free Press will close this commenting platform at noon on July 14.

We want to thank those who have shared their views over the years as part of this reader engagement initiative.

In the coming weeks, the Free Press will announce new opportunities for readers to share their thoughts and to engage with our staff and each other.

You can comment on most stories on The Winnipeg Free Press website. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

By submitting your comment, you agree to abide by our Community Standards and Moderation Policy. These guidelines were revised effective February 27, 2019. Have a question about our comment forum? Check our frequently asked questions.


Advertise With Us