Judge seeking to dismiss suit against her
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Digital Subscription
One year of digital access for only $205*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 21/09/2010 (5857 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
A Manitoba judge at the centre of a sex scandal says the lawsuit against her should be dismissed.
Justice Lori Douglas has filed a statement of defence in which she disputes allegations that one of her husband’s former clients was pressured to have sex with her.
Douglas, her husband Jack King and the Winnipeg law firm where they used to work as lawyers are being sued for $67 million by Alexander Chapman, a man who had previously hired King as his divorce lawyer.
Chapman alleges King approached him in 2003 and asked him to have sex with Douglas. Chapman claims King showed him explicit photos of his wife and pointed him to a website that contained graphic images of Douglas.
King’s lawyer says King was suffering from depression at the time and was acting without Douglas’s knowledge. King has already filed a counter-suit, alleging Chapman is violating a 2003 confidentiality settlement in which King paid him $25,000 to return the photos and not talk about the matter.
Chapman, who didn’t return the photos, has admitted signing the agreement, but says he came forward because he continues to feel victimized.
In her statement of defence, Douglas lays out three arguments for dismissing the lawsuit, including lack of a legal basis. Her lawyer also argues the statute of limitations has been exceeded because the case dates back seven years. He also points to the 2003 confidentiality settlement.
Lawyers for Douglas and King were to be in court Wednesday for a date for a hearing to have the lawsuit quashed.
— The Canadian Press