Report altered, worker claims

Phoenix file missing info, inquiry told

Advertisement

Advertise with us

Documents were altered and information is missing from the file on Phoenix Sinclair, says a former crisis response unit worker with Child and Family Services.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 11/12/2012 (5038 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Documents were altered and information is missing from the file on Phoenix Sinclair, says a former crisis response unit worker with Child and Family Services.

Testifying Monday at the inquiry into the death of the little girl in care, Debbie DeGale said her supervisor changed her assessment of Phoenix’s safety and someone removed important information she swears she wrote.

“Other information was in there,” DeGale said.

Phil Hossack / Winnieg Free Press
'It appears to anybody who's reviewed this paperwork that it appeared to be my assessment and my decision when it wasn't' - Debbie DeGale (second from left)
Phil Hossack / Winnieg Free Press 'It appears to anybody who's reviewed this paperwork that it appeared to be my assessment and my decision when it wasn't' - Debbie DeGale (second from left)

She told the inquiry she recalls the child’s mother, Samantha Kematch, swearing at her on the phone then hanging up. Kematch had gone to Legal Aid and was trying to get sole custody of Phoenix in May 2004 — about a year before Kematch murdered her little girl.

“There were other things I recall doing that I don’t see in that report,” DeGale said.

She was on duty in May 2004 when the welfare worker for Phoenix’s dad, Steve Sinclair, called, concerned about Phoenix’s safety and whereabouts. The worker, who cannot be named, was told Kematch had custody of Phoenix since November 2003 and wanted welfare payments for the little girl. The welfare worker noted the last time Phoenix’s case was open, she was supposed to be in her dad’s care, but he had placed her with friends Kim Edwards and Rohan Stephenson.

The welfare worker recalled the CFS worker saying Phoenix would be in danger if she was returned to either parent, DeGale noted in the file.

On the same day, DeGale took a call from a woman claiming to be one of Phoenix’s aunts. The woman told DeGale the little girl was being mistreated.

“She felt she was neglected and her parents had a history of being mean to her,” said DeGale.

DeGale did a safety assessment of Phoenix’s situation and assigned a 24-hour response time before the file was passed along to CFS intake.

It wasn’t until lawyers for the commission of inquiry interviewed DeGale that she learned her safety assessment had been “altered” and information was missing, she told commission counsel Sherri Walsh.

“Do you have any recollection of writing that information down into the report?” Walsh asked DeGale.

“I recorded everything,” she answered. DeGale said she would have noted the warning call from the “aunt,” and she remembered making other inquiries about the child that weren’t in the CFS file. She couldn’t say who would have removed such information or why.

The “altered” document was her safety assessment of Phoenix.

The 24-hour response time she assigned to the case was changed by DeGale’s supervisor, the inquiry learned.

DeGale’s name, but no signature, appears on the report indicating a less-urgent 48-hour response time was required.

“There’s no way I would’ve assigned that kind of response time,” DeGale said.

The lawyer representing several child welfare authorities, including CFS, asked DeGale if the supervisor had the right to overrule her safety assessment.

“Isn’t the supervisor ultimately responsible for determining the response time?” Kris Saxberg asked.

“Not if someone changes my work and makes it look like I did it,” said DeGale.

Her supervisor should have documented making the change and explained the rationale for it, she added.

That “work” that DeGale denied doing was criticized in reviews conducted by the children’s advocate and the chief medical examiner’s office after Phoenix’s 2005 murder was discovered.

DeGale, who was never interviewed by either report writers, was criticized by both for assigning a 48-hour response time when the situation demanded more urgent action.

“It appears to anybody who’s reviewed this paperwork that it appeared to be my assessment and my decision when it wasn’t,” DeGale told the inquiry.

DeGale said she didn’t find that out until the commission of inquiry was called and she was interviewed by its counsel.

The woman, who still works for CFS, is not being represented by the union lawyer representing other CFS social workers at the inquiry. She has her own lawyer there.

Her testimony continues today.

 

carol.sanders@freepress.mb.ca

Carol Sanders

Carol Sanders
Legislature reporter

Carol Sanders is a reporter at the Free Press legislature bureau. The former general assignment reporter and copy editor joined the paper in 1997. Read more about Carol.

Every piece of reporting Carol produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press‘s tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press’s history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.

 

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

Local

LOAD LOCAL ARTICLES