New treaty commissioner will have key role on road to reconciliation
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Digital Subscription
One year of digital access for only $205*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 03/05/2024 (862 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
If Canadians are to know the true extent to which the federal government has reneged on treaties with Indigenous people, it might come from a new parliamentary treaty commissioner.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced Thursday that the federal government will create a new commissioner for modern treaty implementation. It was a significant announcement.
The new commissioner, whose mandate is being negotiated with Indigenous leaders, will report directly to Parliament, not government.
That’s an important factor. Independent officers who report to Parliament, such as auditors general, are not controlled by government. They have the authority and independence to freely criticize government and its policies.
Canada has never had an independent officer to oversee the implementation of treaties with Indigenous people. This is a first, and it’s long overdue.
To say that Canada has reneged on many of its treaty obligations since the country was founded in 1867 is an understatement. Canada recognizes 70 “historic” treaties signed between 1701 and 1923, either by the British Crown prior to Confederation or by Canada.
Those include the 11 numbered treaties negotiated post-Confederation between 1871 and 1921. The first (Treaty 1) was negotiated in the summer of 1871 at Lower Fort Garry, between the Crown and First Nations and covers what is now southern Manitoba.
Since 1975, the federal government has signed 26 “modern” treaties with Indigenous communities across Canada. The agreements usually include land-claim settlements and provisions for self-government, resource development and other social and economic understandings.
Much like historic contracts though, government has failed to comply with the terms of some modern treaties and has not been held accountable. That could soon change.
The new commissioner is expected to report regularly to Parliament and will issue annual reports on government’s treaty record. For the first time, Canadians will get an independent, impartial assessment of how well, or how poorly, the federal government is meeting its obligations.
That’s important because much of that information has flown under the radar in Canada over the past 153 years. Most Canadians likely don’t even know what treaties are, much less whether government has honoured them. How can the public hold government accountable for something it knows so little about?
A modern treaty commissioner could change that.
To be fully effective, though, the commissioner should also be given the mandate to review historic — not just modern — agreements and report to Parliament on their status. Canada can’t have an intelligent discussion about reconciliation unless it has the information it needs to do so. That should include being educated on both historic and modern treaties.
The issues are not cut and dried. There are conflicting interpretations of historic treaties, including whether First Nations ceded the land the Crown claims they did. Many elders, through oral history, maintain that their territories were never ceded. The federal government claims the opposite. But Ottawa also recognizes there are conflicting interpretations.
“Canada and First Nations often have differing views with respect to the implementation of historic treaties,” the Government of Canada states on its treaty rights web page. “These issues are complex and are not easily resolved.”
The federal government also acknowledges its role in the failure to honour historic treaties.
“Early partnerships between Indigenous nations and colonial governments were forged through treaties as well as trade and military alliances and were based on mutual respect and co-operation,” the Government of Canada web page states.
“Over many centuries these relationships were eroded by colonial and paternalistic policies that were enacted into laws.”
Most of this information is obscure to average Canadians. It hasn’t been taught in schools, at least not fully and accurately, and it has not been top of mind in modern Canadian political culture.
Hopefully that will change with the appointment of a modern treaty commissioner. This could be a game-changer for Canada and its renewed commitment to reconciliation.
tom.brodbeck@freepress.mb.ca
Tom Brodbeck is an award-winning author and columnist with over 30 years experience in print media. He joined the Free Press in 2019. Born and raised in Montreal, Tom graduated from the University of Manitoba in 1993 with a Bachelor of Arts degree in economics and commerce. Read more about Tom.
Tom provides commentary and analysis on political and related issues at the municipal, provincial and federal level. His columns are built on research and coverage of local events. The Free Press’s editing team reviews Tom’s columns before they are posted online or published in print – part of the Free Press’s tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press’s history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.