CIBC, John Doe sued as $350K goes missing

Advertisement

Advertise with us

A Winnipeg law firm is suing the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and an unidentified man after nearly $350,000 was transferred into the wrong account in a home-purchase deal, and then disappeared.

Read this article for free:

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Monthly Digital Subscription

$1 per week for 24 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $4.00 plus GST every four weeks. After 24 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.95 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

Monthly Digital Subscription

$4.99/week*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $19.95 plus GST every four weeks. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

No thanks

*Your next subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $16.99 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $23.99 plus GST every four weeks.

A Winnipeg law firm is suing the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and an unidentified man after nearly $350,000 was transferred into the wrong account in a home-purchase deal, and then disappeared.

Taylor McCaffrey LLP and the Law Society of Manitoba — the legal profession’s provincial regulator — filed the statement of claim in the Court of King’s Bench this week, naming CIBC and John Doe as defendants.

John Doe is the individual whose account the funds were transferred to.

Taylor McCaffrey, which was acting for a client who had purchased a home, requisitioned $343,335 from the mortgagee, the Royal Bank of Canada, on July 31, 2024, says the claim.

The money was to be delivered to the law firm’s trust account at CIBC, but unbeknownst to the firm, the requisition document contained the wrong transit number, the claim alleges.

On about Aug. 2, 2024, RBC wired the money to CIBC, but as a result of the incorrect transit number, it was transferred into John Doe’s account, rather than its trust account, the suit says.

Taylor McCaffrey followed up with CIBC on Aug. 7 and learned about the incorrect transit number and transfer into the wrong account.

The firm sent a new requisition to RBC to deliver replacement funds to its CIBC trust account, which RBC did, allowing the real estate deal to go through.

Months later, the lawsuit alleges, CIBC told the law firm the initial cash transferred to John Doe was gone.

“On or about Nov. 12, 2024, CIBC advised the firm that the initial funds had been deposited into John Doe’s account and that the initial funds had been depleted from that account, therefore were unrecoverable,” says the claim.

“Subsequently, RBC demanded the firm return the initial funds which were deposited into John Doe’s account.”

RBC and the law society came to an agreement in December that in exchange for payment of $333,335 to RBC, the bank assigned its title and interest to its claim for the initial cash to the law society.

The court papers claim that CIBC has refused to provide the identity and other associated information about John Doe.

The lawsuit accuses CIBC of breaching its duty to ensure that the proper account information was in place before the transfer, and its duty to take all possible steps to locate and secure the funds, if the funds weren’t properly deposited, including by calling in law enforcement, if necessary.

The court papers also claim that John Doe knew or should have known he wasn’t entitled to the money that had been wrongly transferred into his account.

“Notwithstanding this, John Doe withdrew the funds so as to keep them out of the reach of others,” reads the claim. “The plaintiffs say that John Doe has been enriched to the detriment of the plaintiffs and there is no juristic reason for the said enrichment.”

CIBC and the unidentified individual have not filed statements of defence.

erik.pindera@freepress.mb.ca

Erik Pindera

Erik Pindera
Reporter

Erik Pindera is a reporter for the Free Press, mostly focusing on crime and justice. The born-and-bred Winnipegger attended Red River College Polytechnic, wrote for the community newspaper in Kenora, Ont. and reported on television and radio in Winnipeg before joining the Free Press in 2020.  Read more about Erik.

Every piece of reporting Erik produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press‘s tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press’s history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

Local

LOAD MORE