Eaton’s building historical resource designation debated
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Monthly Digital Subscription
$0 for the first 4 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*No charge for 4 weeks then price increases to the regular rate of $19.00 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
Monthly Digital Subscription
$4.75/week*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Billed as $19 plus GST every four weeks. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
*Your next subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $16.99 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $23.99 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 21/05/2020 (2032 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
An attempt to designate the Cityplace building as a historical resource by the City of Winnipeg has faced pushback from owner Manitoba Public Insurance.
Originally called the T. Eaton Co. Mail Order and Catalogue Building, the warehouse became the Eaton Place shopping centre and office building in 1979, survived the end of the Eaton’s department store chain in 1999 and has since been renamed Cityplace.
The building, constructed during the First World War and later expanded, was nominated by the historical buildings and resources committee for its historical significance and definitive Sullivanesque-style architecture.
Historical resource buildings are protected by law from demolition, and owners are entitled to financial incentives. The title also prevents certain alterations to buildings depending on “character-defining elements” noted by the committee.
The character-defining elements the committee has suggested for preservation are solely exterior; a city report refers to the entirety of the building’s facade and flat roof as historically significant.
However, MPI has argued such a designation may interfere with previous talks with the city.
“Prior to the coronavirus pandemic, the legal teams from Manitoba Public Insurance and the City of Winnipeg had been in correspondence to determine whether or not the city could designate a provincial, Crown-owned property,” MPI’s response to the city reads.
“That determination has not yet been finalized, which had resulted in a pause on discussions for the owner regarding the heritage designation.”
The response, signed by MPI corporate services director Cheryl Taylor, instead recommends the building be listed as a commemorative resource — a less-restrictive designation that allows demolition and alterations but encourages conservation.
Also being voted on at the historical buildings and resources committee’s May 26 meeting is whether to recommend the former Monarch Life Building on Broadway be listed as a historical resource. The move is being opposed by its owner, the Workers Compensation Board of Manitoba, which argues the designation will interfere with necessary renovations.
The structure at 333 Broadway is considered definitive of modernist architecture in Winnipeg. The WCB has recommended the building be considered a commemorative resource instead.
The committee will issue its decisions to the property and development, heritage, and downtown development for further debate.
malak.abas@freepress.mb.ca
Twitter: malakabas_
Malak Abas is a city reporter at the Free Press. Born and raised in Winnipeg’s North End, she led the campus paper at the University of Manitoba before joining the Free Press in 2020. Read more about Malak.
Every piece of reporting Malak produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press‘s tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press’s history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
History
Updated on Thursday, May 21, 2020 5:50 PM CDT: Adds images.
Updated on Friday, May 22, 2020 7:14 AM CDT: Adds details about history of building