July 12, 2020

23° C, A few clouds

Full Forecast

Close this


Advertise With Us

Effect of U.S. chemical dump on city unclear

Book details 1953 Cold War experiments on Winnipeg

In her book, Lisa Martino-Taylor writes about how the U.S. government secretly exposed people in Winnipeg to dangerous radiation.


In her book, Lisa Martino-Taylor writes about how the U.S. government secretly exposed people in Winnipeg to dangerous radiation.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 13/10/2017 (1003 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Winnipeg was duped into being a "guinea pig" for American chemical warfare experiments in 1953, but no one knows what effect it had on city residents, a University of Manitoba pharmacology professor emeritus says.

"It’s too late now to do anything about it or to know what health effects it had on people," Frank LaBella said Thursday of the aerosol cloud of zinc cadmium sulphide that was sprayed in Winnipeg to test ways of distributing chemical and biological warfare agents.

The deceitful operation by the United States army came to light in 1980 and is back in the spotlight with the publication of a book by an American researcher that includes declassified information. Behind the Fog: How the U.S. Cold War Radiological Weapons Program Exposed Innocent Americans, by Lisa Martino-Taylor, details the testing carried out in cities in the U.S. and Winnipeg (which resembled target sites in the Soviet Union).

"Nobody knew what was going on," LaBella said. In 1953, Winnipeg city council was told civil defence authorities were testing the effects of smoke over the city using "harmless fluorescent powder."

In 1980, Canadian officials confirmed the U.S. Army Chemical Corps had co-ordinated open-air tests in Winnipeg in 1953. They were trying to determine how radioactive fallout from a nuclear explosion would be dispersed by air currents.

When the truth came out, LaBella told the Free Press, cadmium and zinc are metals and generally considered toxic and could be dangerous to the sick or those with asthma, and particularly to very young and old people.

The metals are more dangerous when used in aerosol form and there have been a number of deaths and reported cases of brain damage in individual workers dealing with cadmium sulfide, the professor noted in a Free Press article published 37 years ago.

Today, LaBella is retired but he hasn’t forgotten — or forgiven — authorities for their actions.

"It probably didn’t have much effect," he said of the experiments’ impact on public health.

"In principle, spraying an aerosol chemical mist over a populated area is criminal, to say the least," said LaBell, an neuropharmacology expert. "At the time, there were no reports of illness but, if present, they could not be distinguished from other illnesses. If there were lasting effects, we’ll never know."

The Winnipeg tests ran from July 9 to Aug. 1, 1953, and were extended into September 1953, author Martino-Taylor recently told the Free Press.

"The Winnipeg experiments were part of a larger 1953-54, three-city U.S. army Chemical Corps study that included Minneapolis and St. Louis, which were identified by the U.S. army as analog cities for their ultimate radiological weapons targets of Moscow and Leningrad," she said.

Records show there were 12 tests, with 36 releases of material from airplanes and trucks centralized 5.6 kilometres west of downtown Winnipeg, said the sociology professor at St. Louis Community College in Missouri.

The experiments were designed by Philip Leighton, the U.S. army’s top expert in open-air radiological weapons, who ran Dugway Proving Ground in Utah, a facility that tested chemical, biological, and radiological weapons.

Records show one year after the experiments occurred, Leighton stated the test material called FP2266 was "poisonous" and had "toxic effects," Martino-Taylor told the Free Press. "Leighton said, ‘Compounds of zinc and cadmium are both known to be poisonous when taken into the human system. For this reason, the No. 2266 FP material is labelled with a poison warning when shipped by the manufacturer, and in applications of the material the possibilities of toxic effects must be considered.’"

Martino-Taylor said she’s not an epidemiologist and didn’t set out to study the potential health effects of the experiments. Rather than being alarmed, people should be asking for the release of documents into the public domain related to all open-air studies conducted by Canadian or U.S. military officials.

The Department of National Defence public affairs branch did not respond to a request for comment. Manitoba Health Minister Kelvin Goertzen, "has requested a history of this situation from the department," his spokeswoman said.

LaBella thinks it’s too late to do anything about it.

"There is nothing more to say except to emphasize the stupidity and criminality of the federal government to allow the Americans to use Winnipeg as a guinea pig," he said.

The attitude of the U.S. authorities then was "the area is out in the boondocks, and its citizens... what they don’t know won’t hurt them," LaBella said.


Carol Sanders

Carol Sanders

Carol Sanders’ reporting on newcomers to Canada has made international headlines, earned national recognition but most importantly it’s shared the local stories of the growing diversity of people calling Manitoba home.

Read full biography


Advertise With Us

Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.

To those who have made donations, thank you.

To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.

The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.

After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.

If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.

We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.

The Free Press will close this commenting platform at noon on July 14.

We want to thank those who have shared their views over the years as part of this reader engagement initiative.

In the coming weeks, the Free Press will announce new opportunities for readers to share their thoughts and to engage with our staff and each other.

You can comment on most stories on The Winnipeg Free Press website. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

By submitting your comment, you agree to abide by our Community Standards and Moderation Policy. These guidelines were revised effective February 27, 2019. Have a question about our comment forum? Check our frequently asked questions.


Advertise With Us