Feds failed to consult Peguis on Hydro line project: court

Advertisement

Advertise with us

Ottawa failed to consult with Peguis First Nation in approving construction of a $500-million Manitoba-Minnesota hydro transmission line, Canada’s federal court ruled in a decision issued last week.

Read this article for free:

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Monthly Digital Subscription

$1 per week for 24 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $4.00 plus GST every four weeks. After 24 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.00 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

Monthly Digital Subscription

$4.75/week*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $19 plus GST every four weeks. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Winnipeg Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

No thanks

*$1 will be added to your next bill. After your 4 weeks access is complete your rate will increase by $0.00 a X percent off the regular rate.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 29/09/2021 (1440 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Ottawa failed to consult with Peguis First Nation in approving construction of a $500-million Manitoba-Minnesota hydro transmission line, Canada’s federal court ruled in a decision issued last week.

“In failing to substantively engage with Peguis during supplemental consultations, Canada did not adequately discharge its duty to consult,” Justice Glennys McVeigh wrote in a 92-page decision issued Sept. 24.

In its decision, the federal court dismissed similar judicial review applications by Manitoba First Nations Roseau River and Long Plain, and Animakee Wa Zhing 37 in Ontario.

Because the transmission line has already been in operation for over a year, any remedy beyond a declaration of wrongdoing comes riddled with impracticalities, McVeigh said.

“In judicial review applications, the most common and just remedy is to quash the decision and send it back to the decision-maker for redetermination,” the judge said.

“My finding is that Canada did not adequately consult with Peguis and quashing the decision would unfairly halt the operations of (Manitoba) Hydro, who is a party not at ‘fault’ in this application.”

The transmission line runs from Winnipeg to the Manitoba-Minnesota border, crossing Treaty 1 territory, delivering energy to Manitoba and surplus energy to Minnesota.

“With this declaration, I would hope that Canada completes further consultation with Peguis and that one of the purposes of this consultation can be to determine if any accommodation is necessary,” McVeigh said.

As the country prepares to mark National Day for Truth and Reconciliation, the federal court’s decision “clearly shows” Canada failed to implement reconciliation, Peguis Chief Glenn Hudson said.

“The teaching for Canadians should be that injustice by the federal government continues as a present-day problem,” Hudson said in a news release.

“For our members, our administration diligently engages with all governments regarding all projects within our territory,” he said. “Those responsible to consult with Peguis should know that our approach will always be the same.”

dean.pritchard@freepress.mb.ca

Dean Pritchard

Dean Pritchard
Courts reporter

Dean Pritchard is courts reporter for the Free Press. He has covered the justice system since 1999, working for the Brandon Sun and Winnipeg Sun before joining the Free Press in 2019. Read more about Dean.

Every piece of reporting Dean produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press‘s tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press’s history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

Local

LOAD MORE