August 14, 2018

Winnipeg
18° C, Overcast

Full Forecast

Advertisement

Advertise With Us

Keeyask generating station could cost more than $10 billion, consultant says

Report blames delays and cost overruns on contractor

SUPPLIED</p><p>The final cost of Keeyask hydro generating station could be 62 per cent above the budget set by the former provincial NDP government.</p>

SUPPLIED

The final cost of Keeyask hydro generating station could be 62 per cent above the budget set by the former provincial NDP government.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 18/12/2017 (239 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

An independent review has warned the cost of Manitoba Hydro’s Keeyask hydro generating station could soar as high as $10.5 billion and not be ready until 2022, more than a year behind its original schedule.

The final cost could be 62 per cent above the budget set by the former provincial NDP government. The original cost estimate was $6.5 billion, but has already skyrocketed to $8.7 billion.

A redacted copy of the report prepared by Calgary-based construction-cost consultants MGF Project Services for the Public Utilities Board lays the blame on the contractor.

“Its performance is the largest single contributor to planned cost and schedule not being met,” said the report, which cites the contractor’s “poor productivity.”

Get the full story.
No credit card required. Cancel anytime.

Join free for 60 days

After that, pay as little as $0.99 per month for the best local news coverage in Manitoba.

 

Already a subscriber?

Log in

Join free for 60 days

 

Already a subscriber?

Log in

Subscribers Log in below to continue reading,
not a subscriber? Create an account to start a 60 day free trial.

Log in Create your account

Your free trial has come to an end.

We hope you have enjoyed your trial! To continue reading, we recommend our Read Now Pay Later membership. Simply add a form of payment and pay only 27¢ per article.

For unlimited access to the best local, national, and international news and much more, try an All Access Digital subscription:

Thank you for supporting the journalism that our community needs!

Your free trial has come to an end.

We hope you have enjoyed your trial! To continue reading, we recommend our Read Now Pay Later membership. Simply add a form of payment and pay only 27¢ per article.

For unlimited access to the best local, national, and international news and much more, try an All Access Digital subscription:

Thank you for supporting the journalism that our community needs!

We hope you have enjoyed your free trial!

To continue reading, select a plan below:

All Access Digital

Introductory pricing*

99¢

per month

  • Unlimited online reading and commenting
  • Daily newspaper replica e-Edition
  • News Break - our award-winning iOS app
  • Exclusive perks & discounts
Continue

Read Now Pay Later

Pay

27¢

per article

  • Commitment-free
  • Cancel anytime
  • Only pay for what you read
  • Refunds available
Continue

*Introductory pricing schedule for 12 month: $0.99/month plus tax for first 3 months, $5.99/month for months 4 - 6, $10.99/month for months 7 - 9, $13.99/month for months 10 - 12. Standard All Access Digital rate of $16.99/month begins after first year.

We hope you have enjoyed your free trial!

To continue reading, select a plan below:

Read Now Pay Later

Pay

27¢

per article

  • Commitment-free
  • Cancel anytime
  • Only pay for what you read
  • Refunds available
Continue

All Access Digital

Introductory pricing*

99¢

per month

  • Unlimited online reading and commenting
  • Daily newspaper replica e-Edition
  • News Break - our award-winning iOS app
  • Exclusive perks & discounts
Continue

Mon to Sat Delivery

Pay

$34.36

per month

  • Includes all benefits of All Access Digital
  • 6-day delivery of our award-winning newspaper
Continue

*Introductory pricing schedule for 12 month: $0.99/month plus tax for first 3 months, $5.99/month for months 4 - 6, $10.99/month for months 7 - 9, $13.99/month for months 10 - 12. Standard All Access Digital rate of $16.99/month begins after first year.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 18/12/2017 (239 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

An independent review has warned the cost of Manitoba Hydro’s Keeyask hydro generating station could soar as high as $10.5 billion and not be ready until 2022, more than a year behind its original schedule.

The final cost could be 62 per cent above the budget set by the former provincial NDP government. The original cost estimate was $6.5 billion, but has already skyrocketed to $8.7 billion.

A redacted copy of the report prepared by Calgary-based construction-cost consultants MGF Project Services for the Public Utilities Board lays the blame on the contractor.

"Its performance is the largest single contributor to planned cost and schedule not being met," said the report, which cites the contractor’s "poor productivity."

Manitoba Hydro immediately rejected the consultant’s conclusions Monday and said the project will be ready in August of 2021 at a cost of $8.7 billion.

Crown Services Minister Cliff Cullen told reporters the provincial government accepts the Hydro belief that MGF’s methodology is flawed.

The report on Hydro’s capital projects spending was commissioned by the PUB, currently hearing Hydro’s application for an annual 7.9 per cent rate increase through 2024. MGF found the Bipole III transmission line megaproject, Manitoba-Minnesota transmission line project and the Great Northern transmission line are all generally performing well on budgets and schedules.

In sharp contrast, Keeyask is anything but.

The MGF report says there was an amended agreement Feb. 28, but the contractor is "not meeting the revised productivity factors for concreting and earthworks." It notes Manitoba Hydro staff are competent and professional, but lack the skills and expertise to be construction managers.

The contractor is BBE Hydro Constructors LP, consisting of three companies: Bechtel Canada Co., Barnard Construction and Ellis-Don. A staff member at its Wellington Avenue office said Monday the company has already shut down for the holiday break, and no one responded to a request for an interview.

Poor productivity has resulted in far more man-hours being required to perform work, and once the contractor falls behind schedule, all the other services on the megaproject fall behind while adding to their costs, the report concluded.

The heavily redacted report says 1,030 separate activities are behind schedule, some by as many as 204 days, and 97 are critically behind schedule.

"This is unacceptable management, and more importantly, not in accordance with the contract," said MGF, which has calculated that Keeyask won’t be ready to go before Nov. 25, 2022, more than a year beyond the original completion date.

Catching up to the schedule would require longer working hours, more resources and more concrete work in winter, which the consultant did not recommend, given the project’s productivity issues.

The final cost will be in the $9.5- to $10.5-billion range, said the consultant. If Manitoba Hydro wants to hit the low end of the range, MGF recommends it needs to take over the project.

"There are many cost-saving and contract management exercises that Manitoba Hydro can implement, which can drive down the final cost. Our recommendation is to do this without delay."

The energy utility has worked with a management company for the past year to oversee Keeyask, Hydro spokesman Bruce Owen said Monday.

"We’ve always said there was risk inherent in these large projects. Certainly, there was a setback early in productivity," said Owen.

Hydro believes there is no reason the contractor cannot meet the current targets of $8.7 billion and August of 2021.

The government is concerned about additional delays and cost overruns, but the provincial Conservative government accepts Hydro’s position that won’t happen, Cullen said.

"This company may have a different methodology than Manitoba Hydro," Cullen said. "They’re (Hydro) not making any revisions. It’s not their first rodeo, they’ve been in dam construction before."

Cullen said he didn’t know what Hydro is questioning in MGF’s methods, and his own officials haven’t analyzed the report.

"We wouldn’t be having these discussions if there were appropriate oversight in 2013," Cullen said.

nick.martin@freepress.mb.ca

Advertisement

Advertise With Us

History

Updated on Monday, December 18, 2017 at 8:36 PM CST: Updates story

December 19, 2017 at 9:30 AM: Corrects estimated cost of Keeyask hydro generating station

You can comment on most stories on The Winnipeg Free Press website. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.