Hey there, time traveller! This article was published 26/3/2019 (471 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
OTTAWA — "Appalled" legal experts say Prime Minister Justin Trudeau needs to crack down on a leak that likely stemmed from his office surrounding one of Manitoba’s top judges, or risk undermining public confidence in the Supreme Court.
"I’m quite frankly appalled by the breach of confidentiality that's occurred (and) by the fact that this respected man and sitting judge has had to share personal information about his wife's health, in order to respond to what he has described as an agenda — that he has no part of," said Emma Cunliffe, a University of British Columbia law professor.
Glenn Joyal, the Chief Justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench, said in a statement Monday he had applied for the Supreme Court posting, but withdrew, citing his wife's health.
Emmett Macfarlane, a political science professor at the University of Waterloo, accused the PMO of "using the fact that somebody applied as a cudgel to try to denigrate Jody Wilson-Raybould."
Macfarlane helped craft Trudeau’s appointment processes for Supreme Court justices and Canadian senators.
Since 2016, a panel has reviewed applications in which judges talk at length about their perspective and life experience. The entire process is confidential. The prime minister picks from a shortlist, and only the selected judge’s application is made public.
"It actually could have a chilling effect on the people who put forward applications," he said of the leak, because people could withhold important information or simply not submit applications given the risk of Ottawa breaching their confidentiality.
"To allow a leak is quite frankly dangerous," Macfarlane said, calling it "an attack on the integrity of" the appointment process that requires investigation.
CTV News and The Canadian Press reported Monday that Trudeau clashed with former attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould over her preference for a Supreme Court nominee.
The reports cited unnamed sources, who claimed Wilson-Raybould preferred Joyal over Trudeau’s ultimately chosen judge; that she wrote a 60-page report to Trudeau in 2017 arguing Joyal be made head of the Supreme Court (an exceptional move for someone not already on the bench); and this caused Trudeau to doubt Wilson-Raybould’s judgment, before he removed her from the role.
The news sent reverberations through Canada's legal community.
"In Canada, we’ve really avoided the politicization of the bench, and the judges on our courts are really strong," said Karen Busby, a constitutional law professor at the University of Manitoba.
She was responding to what she called "an attempt to politicize" Joyal.
The Manitoba Bar Association said the incident was "highly disconcerting." It also called out claims in the media that Joyal would reverse gay rights and abortion access as "entirely improper, and indeed false" insinuations.
Joyal was similarly unimpressed: "I fear that someone is using my previous candidacy to the Supreme Court of Canada to further an agenda unrelated to the appointment process. This is wrong."
While it’s unknown who leaked the fact Joyal had even applied, the information is widely believed to stem from the Prime Minister's Office, given how confidential the process is, and the source was unflattering to Wilson-Raybould.
Trudeau gave reporters no indication he’d do anything about such concern. He also wouldn’t deny the leak came from his office.
"Canadians can know that we have a strong and independent judiciary. And as would be proper, I’m not going to comment any further on it," Trudeau said Tuesday in Winnipeg. He repeated the same points two more times when asked about the situation.
That’s not good enough for the UBC's Cunliffe, who said the leaks unfairly raise questions around the judge whom Trudeau ultimately appointed to the bench, Sheilah Martin.
"If there's some suggestion that there was inappropriate interference in the process, then it's a short step to questioning whether she was the best candidate," Cunliffe said. "This is unprecedented, in my experience."
She said the leak has to be investigated in order to avoid a similar situation.
The experts said this week’s leak brought to mind then-prime minister Stephen Harper’s May 2014 rift with now-retired chief justice Beverley McLachlin.
The latest updates on the novel coronavirus and COVID-19.
Harper had disclosed McLachlin reached out to his justice minister, over a concern he may try to appoint a judge who would not meet the legislated criteria to serve on the bench. He inferred she was meddling in the administration of justice.
"What happens in the United States now just reminds all Canadians of really how lucky we are, that we have a very strong, independent judiciary, and we don’t have a tradition of gratuitously criticizing the judiciary," Busby said.
The Canadian Bar Association released a statement Tuesday saying naming applicants and commenting on their suitability "demeans the selection process and ultimately all those who hold the office."
Joyal declined to comment Tuesday, as did Manitoba Justice Minister Cliff Cullen.
— with files from Jessica Botelho-Urbanski
Joyal no homophobe: U of M prof
OTTAWA — Monday’s reported leaks surrounding Manitoba Chief Justice Glenn Joyal’s application for the Supreme Court expose how political shapes judicial appointments, experts say.
Media reports referenced a January 2017 speech Joyal gave to the right-leaning Canadian Constitution Foundation, in which he said judges’ broad interpretations of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms have led to “an institutional imbalance” on social issues.
The reports claimed Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was concerned Joyal would try to roll back LGBTTQ* rights and abortion access if those cases came before him, out of a belief legislatures ought to first encode such measures.
Karen Busby, a law professor at the University of Manitoba, said she reads each of the province’s appeal-court decisions, and couldn’t see a conservative bias by Joyal. She also rejects any insurance Joyal is homophobic, based on the talks they’ve had at various conferences and professional dinners.
“I'm queer and that's just not my experience with Joyal at all,” she said. “I cannot say, in all honesty, that there is a problems with any judge in Manitoba, in the ways in which they’re making charter rulings — and I teach constitutional law.”
Emmett Macfarlane, a political science professor at the University of Waterloo, noted the fact Joyal’s perspectives were part of the information given to reporters in the initial story.
"If anything, the leak shows that it is a very political process — (and) we’ve managed to keep partisan politics out of it,” he said.
The Manitoba Bar Association said Joyal had defended equality, as well as individual and group rights.
"Nothing in what he has done throughout his judicial career, nor in the publicized comments he has made, could suggest that he is against a woman’s right to choose, same-sex marriage, or LGBTQ2S rights generally," wrote MBA head Mark Toews.
"It is most appalling that such an inaccurate description has been suggested or implied."
Busby also feared the articles citing Joyal’s 2017 speech would add to judges’ existing reluctance to speak publicly, whether it’s to a conservative group or a feminist conference.
“Generally, when judges go out and give talks, they are the most boring people in the world, because all they do is read their judgements, because they're so afraid of saying anything. And I would hardly want to be critical of a judge who actually tries to engage in a bit of public debate,” she said.
“If we parse every single word they say... they're not going to engage in public conversations.”
Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.
Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.
To those who have made donations, thank you.
To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.
The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.
While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.
After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.
If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.
We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.
Updated on Tuesday, March 26, 2019 at 10:03 PM CDT: Updates.
10:41 PM: Minor fix to quote
March 27, 2019 at 9:32 AM: Typo fixed.
10:14 AM: clarifies posting was for Supreme Court position