July 10, 2020

19° C, A few clouds

Full Forecast

Close this


Advertise With Us

Report reveals crude oil shipment amounts

John Woods / The Canadian Press FILES</p><p>The National Energy Board says Canada exported a record 327,229 barrels per day in October 2018, and a series of record-breaking highs has followed.</p></p>

John Woods / The Canadian Press FILES

The National Energy Board says Canada exported a record 327,229 barrels per day in October 2018, and a series of record-breaking highs has followed.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 18/3/2019 (480 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

OTTAWA — Lord Roberts resident Bev Pike has tried for years to figure out how much oil is moving along the train tracks in her neighbourhood; it seems the number of oil tank cars has increased.

"It’s full trains that are just oil," said Pike, who counts tank cars that bear the red 12-67 placard, which indicates crude oil. "It’s increasing dramatically; that’s what we see in this neighbourhood."

Newly obtained data, which CN Rail fought against being publicly released, provides a rare look at just how much oil has been moving by rail in Manitoba.

CN Rail transported about 20 million barrels of crude oil from Winnipeg to northwestern Ontario over the course of 12 months five years ago, according to risk assessments the railway filed to Transport Canada.

The April 2014 report shows the company transported 97,000 carloads of dangerous goods, of which 29,000 had crude oil, in one year.

The fact that the report was only made public five years later underscores the difficulty concerned citizens, environmental groups and journalists face in trying to obtain the most basic information needed to assess railways’ risk-reduction measures.

Transport Canada released the data last month after a federal commissioner intervened in a July 2015 access-to-information request. Officials rejected CN Rail’s arguments that divulging the data would present a serious risk to public safety.

"It’s pretty telling that Canadians have to really fight and wait years just for the right to know what’s passing through their communities," said Charles Hatt, a Toronto lawyer with Ecojustice, a charity.

Hatt requested the report on behalf of the advocacy group Safe Rail Communities, which was formed following the 2013 rail disaster in Lac-Mégantic, Que., in which 47 people were killed.

In the wake of that tragedy, the Harper government compelled large railways that carry dangerous goods to undertake and submit detailed risk assessments.

The April 2014 report shows that 97,000 carloads of dangerous goods were transported through the Sprague subdivision, which runs from Winnipeg’s Symington Yard east to Rainy River, Ont. Crude oil was in 29,000 of those cars.

Although the volume of a carload can vary based on the type of crude oil, the calculation for the most common type of oil shipment likely would have totalled 20 million barrels of oil.

The time period of those shipments is marked as "annual," although CN Rail would not confirm the time period in which the data was collected. The figures line up with with American filings by the corporation’s U.S. subsidiary for the 2013 calendar year.

It’s hard to compare that data with more recent shipments because such information published by railways is scant. CN said that’s because it is too risky.

"Public safety demands that details respecting dangerous goods routing and volumes shipped per route need to be secure and used only for emergency preparedness and response purposes and only by those mandated to be involved," wrote spokesman Jonathan Abecassis.

He asserted that "detailed traffic data from 2014 is not something that necessarily holds much validity today" because the volume of dangerous goods and the routes they take "change constantly."

However, other reports show the amount of crude oil shipped by rail across Canada has been increasing at a dramatic rate.

The National Energy Board said a record high of 327,229 barrels per day were exported by rail in October 2018. That’s nearly 2.5 times more than in October 2017, and a string of record-breaking highs has followed.

Energy board data also show that pipelines transport vastly more oil through Manitoba than rail cars, with 2.9 million barrels per day in 2014; that number grew to 3.8 million last year.

Instead of providing more recent data on rail shipments, Abecassis noted that last year, CN had only two derailments in Canada in which dangerous goods were spilled. He added that train shipments mean explosive material are not transported on highways.

CN joined two other rail companies in a British Columbia tribunal case last November, arguing that allowing the province to publish quarterly reports on how much oil each rail line carried would empower saboteurs and terrorists.

Both Hatt and Pike were sympathetic to that concern, but they argue rail companies could let citizens know roughly how much oil is moving through their communities over the course of months without putting those tracks in danger.

"When you disclose meaningful information you’re demonstrating trust in Canadians as well; it’s a two-way thing," Pike said.

"The tools are easily available, you could disclose information in a meaningful way that also protects public interest. There’s steps to take to build trust, and they’re not taking them," she said. "That means there’s something shady going on."

Last spring, an independent review of rail safety submitted to Transport Minister Marc Garneau argued that Canadians ought to have more information, because the Lac-Mégantic disaster still leaves many Canadians skeptical of how railways are regulated.

The report warned that mistrust in the rail sector could end up matching the opposition to pipelines that has stalled major projects.

When asked about that concern last Wednesday, Garneau noted that first-responders have access to real-time data as needed; he did not speak about public access.

"Carrying certain products has to be kept, to some extent, secure, so there is not a precise and advertised knowledge of every single product that’s in every train crossing the country," Garneau told the Free Press.

Pike said it’s hard to trust CN’s claims that it prioritizes safety without being able to see specific local data, especially after last spring’s series of brush fires along its Winnipeg rail lines. The company denied it was at fault; the city produced video evidence that disputed that contention.

"If everything else added up it would be a different story, but they sure don’t seem open and transparent now."



Advertise With Us

Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.

To those who have made donations, thank you.

To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.

The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.

After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.

If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.

We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.


Updated on Monday, March 18, 2019 at 9:45 AM CDT: Pdf added.

The Free Press will close this commenting platform at noon on July 14.

We want to thank those who have shared their views over the years as part of this reader engagement initiative.

In the coming weeks, the Free Press will announce new opportunities for readers to share their thoughts and to engage with our staff and each other.

You can comment on most stories on The Winnipeg Free Press website. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

By submitting your comment, you agree to abide by our Community Standards and Moderation Policy. These guidelines were revised effective February 27, 2019. Have a question about our comment forum? Check our frequently asked questions.


Advertise With Us