May 31, 2020

Winnipeg
18° C, Partly cloudy

Full Forecast

Help us deliver reliable news during this pandemic.

We are working tirelessly to bring you trusted information about COVID-19. Support our efforts by subscribing today.

No Thanks Subscribe

Already a subscriber?

Advertisement

Advertise With Us

Shooting victim had history of civil, small claims court losses

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 13/3/2019 (444 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

The man shot to death Tuesday morning in Winnipeg’s West End was reportedly hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt to various parties and had a history of being unable — or refusing — to pay up.

Court records show Brett Anthony Cadieux, 23, had a lengthy record of passing bad cheques or defaulting on payments to local companies, and subsequently being sued in provincial court for significant sums of money.

FACEBOOK</p><p>Brett Cadieux.</p>

FACEBOOK

Brett Cadieux.

The pattern replayed itself with various other people who never bothered to take the young man — who had gang ties — to court, sources told the Free Press.

Police were called to the 1300 block of Ellice Avenue around 1:15 a.m. Tuesday, and found Cadieux suffering from at least one gunshot wound. He was taken to hospital in critical condition and later pronounced dead.

The incident marked Winnipeg’s eighth homicide of 2019, and the fifth stemming from gun violence.

Court records show Cadieux had been ordered by various judges to pay roughly $140,000 in civil and small claims judgements to a number of companies — including Manitoba Public Insurance, Bank of Nova Scotia and a local auto dealership.

In addition, sources told the Free Press that Cadieux’s debts to various people in Winnipeg totalled hundreds of thousands of dollars.

The Winnipeg Police Service homicide unit is investigating the case. No suspects or arrests have been announced, although police have said they believe the attack "was not random in nature."

Cadieux’s most recent legal troubles stemmed from an incident Nov. 30, 2017, when he passed a bad cheque for roughly $46,000 as payment for a vehicle at a local dealership.

When the business realized the cheque wasn’t valid, it sought return of the vehicle. He refused, and declined to file a statement of defence in the case, court records show.

A default judgement was handed down ordering Cadieux to repay roughly $48,000 to the dealership, although it appears no payment was ever made.

The pattern repeated itself in other case documents, painting a picture of a man who passed bad cheques, was frequently subject to litigation, and who ignored calls to participate in court proceedings.

For example, by August 2016, two accounts with the Bank of Nova Scotia set up for himself and a numbered company he owned were in arrears of roughly $78,000.

Cadieux refused repayment to the bank and declined to file a statement of defence when sued, court records show.

A default judgement was subsequently delivered by a judge for roughly $80,000, although there’s no indication of payment.

ryan.thorpe@freepress.mb.ca

Twitter: @rk_thorpe

Ryan Thorpe

Ryan Thorpe
Reporter

Ryan Thorpe likes the pace of daily news, the feeling of a broadsheet in his hands and the stress of never-ending deadlines hanging over his head.

Read full biography

Advertisement

Advertise With Us

Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.

To those who have made donations, thank you.

To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.

The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.

After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.

If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.

We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.

We are no longer accepting comments on this story as most submissions did not meet our terms.

Why aren't comments accepted on this story? See our Commenting Terms and Conditions.

Advertisement

Advertise With Us