May 31, 2020

25° C, Partly cloudy

Full Forecast

Winnipeg Free Press


Help us deliver reliable news during this pandemic.

We are working tirelessly to bring you trusted information about COVID-19. Support our efforts by subscribing today.

No Thanks Subscribe

Already a subscriber?

SNC-Lavalin's power and influence over Trudeau's government alarming


Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 16/8/2019 (289 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

We knew executives from Montreal-based SNC-Lavalin were lobbying the Trudeau government hard to have criminal charges against the company stayed. But the regular access they had to the highest levels of the federal government while doing so is stunning.

In a scathing report this week, Ethics Commissioner Mario Dion meticulously documented attempts by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, his staff and senior officials from other government departments to improperly influence then-attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau


Prime Minister Justin Trudeau

But he also gave the public a window into how embedded the company was with the Liberal government. The 58-page report details two years of high-level meetings between SNC-Lavalin officials and senior members of government, including cabinet members and then-clerk of the privy council Michael Wernick. It lays out how the company and senior federal officials conspired not only to pressure Wilson-Raybould to interfere in the SNC-Lavalin case, but also to seek ways to influence the prosecution branch behind her back.

The report shows how the story isn’t just about Trudeau trying to alter the outcome of a criminal prosecution — which is bad enough. It’s also about how government allowed a large corporation to hijack the public policy functions of Parliament and cabinet.

"Throughout the public consultations and the ensuing legislative process to adopt the remediation agreement, SNC-Lavalin engaged in regular discussions with officials in the prime minister’s office, the privy council office and the minister of finance’s office," wrote Dion. "Moreover, SNC-Lavalin regularly kept the prime minister’s office apprised of upcoming board meetings, of negative media coverage, and of the fluctuations in its share price."

Trudeau met with SNC-Lavalin as far back as 2016 when the company was lobbying government to bring in remediation agreements, which allow companies accused of certain crimes to negotiate settlements outside the criminal justice system.

The lobbying worked. By the fall of 2017, the federal government held public consultations on the idea of bringing in remediation agreements. Before the results of those consultations were even released, SNC-Lavalin was already meeting with finance department officials to convince them to add the proposed changes to an omnibus budget bill. They succeeded. Within weeks the proposed change was tucked away deep in a budget implementation bill, surprising even some Liberal MPs who sat on the finance committee.

The remediation agreement section of the bill bypassed the usual scrutiny it would have received at the Commons justice committee. It was passed that summer and became law in September. Even before it was proclaimed, eager finance department officials were inquiring with the attorney general’s office about its use for SNC-Lavalin, the report found.

Up until then, it seems whatever SNC-Lavalin wanted, SNC-Lavalin got.

Which is why the company was stunned when the director of public prosecutions ruled in September 2018 that SNC-Lavalin wasn’t eligible for a remediation agreement.

Trudeau was "perplexed," and Finance Minister Bill Morneau was "shocked," the report says. The whole reason they brought in remediation agreements was for SNC-Lavalin.

The number of meetings between the company and government intensified at that point, the investigation found. SNC-Lavalin wanted to know what government officials were going to do about this unexpected turn of events. When the company filed a judicial review in federal court to fight the decision, government officials were helping the company — behind the attorney general’s back — craft the "public interest" arguments it would use, the report said.

It’s one of the most damning revelations in the report.

"The evidence indicated that discussions between the prime minister’s office and SNC-Lavalin intensified in number and in tenor following the commencement of legal proceeding," Dion wrote. "Legal counsel for SNC-Lavalin became the primary points of contact in discussions with the prime minister’s office in November and December 2018. During that time, various settlement mechanisms were discussed without regard to the prosecution service’s role, as the delegated representative of the attorney general, in the proceeding."

All this was going on while the prime minister’s office and other senior government officials continued to badger Wilson-Raybould to overturn the prosecution branch’s decision. And it was happening while the criminal charges were still before the courts.

It’s unconscionable for a government to be working directly with a company facing criminal charges to help it find ways to avoid a prosecution.

This is a bigger scandal than we thought. Canadians really need to pay close attention to what went on here.

Tom Brodbeck

Tom Brodbeck

Tom has been covering Manitoba politics since the early 1990s and joined the Winnipeg Free Press news team in 2019.

Read full biography

Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.

To those who have made donations, thank you.

To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.

The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.

After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.

If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.

We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.

The Free Press would like to thank our readers for their patience while comments were not available on our site. We're continuing to work with our commenting software provider on issues with the platform. In the meantime, if you're not able to see comments after logging in to our site, please try refreshing the page.

You can comment on most stories on The Winnipeg Free Press website. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

By submitting your comment, you agree to abide by our Community Standards and Moderation Policy. These guidelines were revised effective February 27, 2019. Have a question about our comment forum? Check our frequently asked questions.