Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 15/11/2019 (231 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
Six Winnipeg buildings are up for potential preservation next week when their nominations are set to go before the historical buildings and resources committee.
One of the nominations — the Somerset Building at 294 Portage Ave. — is being opposed by the property’s owner, who contends the building is not historically significant.
"The building itself does not represent a significant or distinct architectural building or unique character, and, there are no known historical events that occurred at the building which would render it historically significant," said Leo Ledohowski, on behalf of the Canad Inns, in a written submission.
"In addition, the building has undergone so many renovations and remodels since its construction, that even the City of Winnipeg representatives commented during their site tour that there is very little of the original remaining."
The nominations will go before the historical buildings committee Wednesday, Nov. 20.
Designed by local architect John Woodman in the style of the "Chicago School," The Somerset Building was constructed shortly after 1905. The project was bankrolled by the well-known local lawyer J.A.M. Aikins.
While the current owner opposes the property being added to the city’s historical resources list, Ledohowski said they have no problem with the building being added to the commemorative list.
Once a property is added to the historical resources list, it places a number of constraints on the owner when it comes to renovating or redeveloping the site; however, the commemorative list is far less restrictive.
The nomination committee has identified a number of exterior elements on the building they consider historically significant, including its north, south and west facades.
In addition, the nomination committee also identified two interior elements at the building — both stair railings — as "character-defining elements."
The other properties nominated for historical protection next Wednesday are:
A number of the buildings were previously up for protection in September, but the votes were pushed back.
Ryan Thorpe likes the pace of daily news, the feeling of a broadsheet in his hands and the stress of never-ending deadlines hanging over his head.
Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.
Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.
To those who have made donations, thank you.
To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.
The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.
While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.
After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.
If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.
We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.
Updated on Friday, November 15, 2019 at 12:03 PM CST: replaces image