February 27, 2020

-10° C, Overcast

Full Forecast


Advertise With Us

Supreme Court backs Métis

Rules Ottawa failed to fulfil land promise

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 8/3/2013 (2546 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

'Our  time has come. This day will forever be marked as a new beginning' -- MMF head David Chartrand


'Our time has come. This day will forever be marked as a new beginning' -- MMF head David Chartrand

OTTAWA — David Chartrand is waiting by the phone for Prime Minister Stephen Harper to call in the wake of a landmark court victory that determined the federal government failed to live up to obligations to Manitoba's Métis.

Chartrand, the head of the Manitoba Metis Federation, is eager to restart negotiating a land claim that is as old as Manitoba itself.

At the heart of the dispute is how 566,000 hectares (1.4 million acres) of land was to be set aside for Métis children as promised by Canada in the Manitoba Act of 1870.

"Our time has come," said Chartrand. "This day will forever be marked as a new beginning."

The case is worth millions of dollars in compensation to the Métis in Manitoba, though Chartrand was unwilling to put a dollar figure on the negotiations Friday, saying he doesn't want to negotiate in public.

Chartrand said the significance of the case is clear if one imagines how successful the Métis would have been had they not been shut out of the land promised to them.

The MMF spent more than $5 million fighting this case, which was first filed in 1981. After years of negotiations with the federal government went nowhere, the MMF went to court asking for a declaration that the Crown had not lived up to its fiduciary responsibility, or the honour of the Crown, when it doled out land to more than 7,000 Métis children between 1870 and 1885. It also argued the Province of Manitoba violated the Constitution when it passed several laws dealing with the doling out of the land.

The land was promised in Section 31 of the Manitoba Act of 1870, in return for Red River settlers agreeing to become part of Canada. Métis leader Louis Riel led the negotiations.

Both a lower court and the Manitoba Court of Appeal ruled against the MMF. However, in a 6-2 decision Friday, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the appeal on the fiduciary duty and said the claims against the province were not dealt with because those laws had long since been repealed. However, it ruled in favour of the MMF on the third claim.

"Although the honour of the Crown obliged the government to act with diligence to fulfil Section 31, it acted with persistent inattention and failed to act diligently to achieve the purposes of the Section 31 grant," the ruling said. "This was not a matter of occasional negligence, but of repeated mistakes and inaction that persisted for more than a decade, substantially defeating a purpose of Section 31."

The court found the purpose of section 31 was to "give the Métis a head start in the race for land and a place in the new province. This required that the grants be made while a head start was still possible."

However, by the time the land was doled out, settlers had taken most of the best land.

It took more than 10 years for the Crown to make the allotments of land, and 15 years for the Métis children who did not receive land to receive money instead. The money was based on 1879 land prices, which by 1885, could not buy nearly the same amount of land as the children would have received.

Tom Berger, the lawyer representing the MMF, said it is a historic ruling.

"This is a call for the federal government to negotiate with the MMF to deal with an historical wrong," said Berger.

Shouts of joy filled the grand entrance hall and echoed through the hallways of the Supreme Court building in Ottawa as members of the Manitoba Metis Federation heard the news Friday morning.

"It is a proud, proud day," said Chartrand. "I'm sure Louis Riel must be smiling down on us today."

The MMF is not seeking to reclaim the land that would have gone to the Métis children if Section 31 had been fulfilled as promised. Most of that land is in private hands in modern-day Winnipeg. Instead, the MMF is looking for other land or a cash settlement.

A spokesman for Aboriginal Affairs Minister Bernard Valcourt said the government is reviewing the ruling.

"The government... will continue to work with Métis people to improve their quality of life," Jason MacDonald said.

Manitoba Conservative MP Rod Bruinooge, who is Métis, welcomed the decision. "This is an important chapter in Manitoba's and Canada's history."

He said he expects the government to act quickly. "I'm certain the government is going to take this ruling to heart," he said. "I think there will be an open process to consult with the MMF."

Manitoba Justice Minister Andrew Swan said the province respects the ruling. "The decision provides an opportunity for all of the involved parties to move forward with a more collaborative approach."



Advertise With Us


Updated on Saturday, March 9, 2013 at 10:00 AM CST: changes photo, adds fact box

11:04 AM: corrects typo

12:40 PM: Adds video

The Free Press would like to thank our readers for their patience while comments were not available on our site. We're continuing to work with our commenting software provider on issues with the platform. In the meantime, if you're not able to see comments after logging in to our site, please try refreshing the page.

You can comment on most stories on The Winnipeg Free Press website. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

By submitting your comment, you agree to abide by our Community Standards and Moderation Policy. These guidelines were revised effective February 27, 2019. Have a question about our comment forum? Check our frequently asked questions.


Advertise With Us