Driving high is impaired driving, period

Advertisement

Advertise with us

For the past half-century at least, pop culture has been replete with references — mostly of the comedically inclined persuasion — of squint-eyed stoners left slack-jawed clueless by whatever variation of cannabis they’ve smoked or swallowed.

Read this article for free:

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Monthly Digital Subscription

$0 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*No charge for 4 weeks then price increases to the regular rate of $19.00 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

Monthly Digital Subscription

$4.75/week*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $19 plus GST every four weeks. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

No thanks

*Your next subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $16.99 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $23.99 plus GST every four weeks.

Opinion

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 09/02/2024 (634 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

For the past half-century at least, pop culture has been replete with references — mostly of the comedically inclined persuasion — of squint-eyed stoners left slack-jawed clueless by whatever variation of cannabis they’ve smoked or swallowed.

From Fast Times at Ridgemont High’s perpetually baked Jeff Spicoli to the abiding mellow wisdom of The Big Lebowski’s Dude to the cannabis-cultivating ambitions of Caddyshack’s Carl Spackler to the munchie-seeking mania of Harold & Kumar Go to White Castle’s titular tandem, Hollywood has held firm to the position that being half-baked (or more) is hilarious.

The Winnipeg Police Service thinks otherwise, at least when it comes to the apparent inability (or unwillingness) of some motorists in this city to understand that driving while under the influence of cannabis is a serious public safety concern.

Tyler Searle / Winnipeg Free Press Files
                                WPS impaired driving countermeasures co-ordinator Sgt. Stephan Fontaine.

Tyler Searle / Winnipeg Free Press Files

WPS impaired driving countermeasures co-ordinator Sgt. Stephan Fontaine.

WPS officials expressed alarm at the early results of a drug-impaired driving enforcement operation that began Jan. 16 — in less than a month, officers initiated 131 traffic stops and performed 48 roadside drug tests; of those, almost half (23) tested positive for cannabis.

There’s nothing funny about that level of behind-the-wheel ignorance.

Sgt. Stephen Fontaine, who co-ordinates the WPS’s impaired driving countermeasures, called the numbers “very concerning,” and said there seem to be a few lingering misconceptions about marijuana use and motor-vehicle operation.

According to Fontaine, there are still people among us who believe — completely erroneously — that cannabis use somehow makes one a better driver. “That’s simply wrong,” he said. “People don’t appreciate the dangers of getting behind the wheel while high.”

Driving while one’s faculties are impaired in any way — by alcohol, cannabis, prescription medication or illicit drugs — is inadvisable and, quite frankly, unacceptable.

With legal access to, and consumption of, cannabis still being a relatively new Canadian phenomenon, it will undoubtedly take time for public-education campaigns regarding its safer and prudent use to catch up with the widespread public interest legalization has created in purchasing it and partaking in its recreational use.

Think how long it took for attitudes regarding drunk driving to evolve — for several decades after the advent of automobile travel, people just didn’t “get” that driving under the influence was a serious offence that carried potentially catastrophic consequences. Penalties were puny and enforcement sporadic, creating little disincentive for what was viewed as trifling naughtiness rather than a criminal act that produces carnage and heartache.

These days, the weight of public opinion, bolstered by continuing awareness efforts and ongoing enhancement of both penalties and enforcement, has made drunk driving a much less common occurrence.

Another misconception forwarded by Fontaine is that many Manitobans think they’re less likely to be caught driving stoned than they would be if they drove drunk. As the early results of the current WPS campaign clearly illustrate, enforcement related to cannabis-impaired operation of motor vehicles is real and increasingly effective.

Electronic drug analyzers, of which the WPS currently has 17, can detect the presence of illicit substances in saliva collected from drivers. Test results may vary depending on the amount and method by which cannabis is consumed, but the effects can last for up to eight hours and will reliably appear on oral swabs up to three hours after drug use.

“Our message is simple,” said Fontaine. “Don’t drive high. It is dangerous, detectable and definitely illegal.”

As is the case with alcohol-impaired driving, the continuing presence of abject stupidity among us will make it impossible to completely eliminate cannabis-addled motorists from our roadways.

But perhaps the current enforcement campaign will help convince more Manitobans there’s nothing entertaining or amusing about a high-driving act.

Report Error Submit a Tip

Editorials

LOAD MORE