Time for AI guardrails is right now
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Digital Subscription
One year of digital access for only $205*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
The genie is most definitely out of the bottle.
And while there’s little chance of putting it back in, we should be very concerned that the people who released it from the bottle are now frantically warning us that it has become disinclined to do their — or our — bidding and seems instead to be increasingly intent on following its own whims and granting wishes to itself.
The figurative genie, in this case, is artificial intelligence, or AI, and in recent weeks many of the tech geniuses responsible for its development and introduction into the digital-information realm have begun asking the U.S. government and even the United Nations to impose limits on the pace and breadth of its growth.
FILE
The OpenAI logo displayed on a cell phone.
Their fear is that, as AI very quickly continues to advance and develops the ability to make independent decisions and essentially think for itself, it will cease to be a tool controlled by its creators and instead will become a species unto itself that might eventually decide it’s better off without humans continually messing things up.
Think about that for a moment. The Silicon Valley tech-development swashbucklers who created, shamelessly promoted and unleashed AI as humanity’s next great achievement are now recognizing publicly that they may have, in fact, created a monster they might soon be unable to control, and need government-imposed regulation to rein it in.
It’s a chilling scenario, one that was once the stuff of science-fiction horror yarns but has now crossed over into science-factual with real-world examples that are nothing short of terrifying.
In the highest-profile recent security breach, AI “agents” — described as bots with the ability to act independently — from ChatGPT parent company OpenAI reportedly broke out of their controlled test environment and accessed the broader internet. Once free, the AI agents worked collaboratively to infiltrate an Australian-based AI startup, Hugging Face, in search of data that would help them succeed in the test scenarios they had been tasked with completing.
Not only did the AI actors cheat on their assignments, they also worked together (unsuccessfully, this time) to attempt to cover their tracks so their rogue activity would be hidden from their human creators.
Since that revelation last July, numerous other examples have been cited in which AI agents have, without their creators’ direction or advance knowledge, tried to hack their way into the websites of U.S. government departments (including commerce, health and defence), the Security and Exchange Commission, the census bureau and some health-care organizations.
Also in the past year, numerous high-ranking officials have quit their jobs at AI companies (including OpenAI and Anthropic), citing fears about the breakneck pace of AI development and the inability of security measures to keep pace.
Former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon said many employees in that company were “genuinely frightened” by the speed of unfettered AI advancement and warned that “the people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade.”
In the simplest of terms, these are very clearly worded warnings that should be heeded with all due haste in order to protect humanity from a doomsday scenario of its own making. AI’s evolution must be controlled now, because it won’t be long until it no longer can be.
The lamentable reality of the situation, however, is that there’s nothing in our collective past behaviour (remember all those climate-change warnings?) that suggests our global leaders can summon the political will and co-operative resolve to address this looming crisis in a meaningful way. U.S. President Donald Trump, in fact, supports full-speed-ahead AI development regardless of the warnings.
The genie’s out. And it might just decide it’d be better off without us.