Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 4/10/2019 (245 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
In journalism, it is often hard to figure out when you should congratulate someone for making progress in addressing a problem, or criticize them for not making enough progress. The issue of diversity in the Manitoba legislature is one of those instances.
There is an argument to be made that the roster of MLAs returned by the recent general election is among the most diverse in Manitoba history. The first three black MLAs ever elected in this province — Tory Audrey Gordon and New Democrats Uzoma Asagwara and Jamie Moses — now sit proudly in the legislature. Asagwara is also Manitoba’s first gender non-conforming MLA.
But the move to diversity does not stop there. According to a Free Press survey of all 57 winning MLAs, there are also 15 women in the legislature, an increase of one over the pre-election configuration, and the assembly will be measurably younger with a median age of 49 years old, down from 54.5 years in the last session.
However, this is where the cause of diversity begins to stall. The Progressive Conservative government currently features only four women out of 13 cabinet positions, and all are Caucasian. While the legislature on the whole may be evolving, the roster of those who have their hands on the levers of power remains stuck in a very traditional, very Caucasian context.
The real concern — and the one that mitigates the progress we’ve made — is that while Manitoba is becoming one of the most diverse provinces in Canada, the changes we see in the general population are just not being reflected quickly enough in the Manitoba legislature.
In 2017, Statistics Canada forecast that Manitoba may become the first majority non-white province in the country. A steady inflow of immigrants and just-as-steady increase in the Indigenous population are combining to shrink the portion of our population that identifies as Caucasian. Currently, close to 40 per cent of all Manitobans identify themselves as other than Caucasian, and demographers believe it will only continue to increase.
Even when party leaders publicly pledge to increase the number of women and minorities who are nominated to run in an election, we still end up with a majority of white men on the ballot and in the upper echelon of the political arm of government.
Why has the makeup of the legislative assembly lagged behind? Just as the culture and mechanisms of partisan politics have conspired against women for generations, so too do they work to keep people of colour from seeking elected public office.
Political parties — from the executive level on down through the boards of electoral districts — are dominated by white men who, thanks to human nature, are completely comfortable promoting and supporting candidates who look like them. Even when party leaders publicly pledge to increase the number of women and minorities who are nominated to run in an election, we still end up with a majority of white men on the ballot and in the upper echelon of the political arm of government.
The sheer force of demographics will always nudge things along. But at some point, political leaders are going to have to be much more aggressive and deliberate in literally changing the face of their parties if elected officials are ever to more closely mirror the broader communities they serve.
So, yes, let’s celebrate the advances in diversity that we’ve made in the constitution of the Manitoba legislative assembly. But let’s ensure that the huzzahs and confetti cannons do not obscure the fact that there is a lot more work to be done before we can truly claim success.
Editorials are the consensus view of the Winnipeg Free Press’ editorial board.
Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.
Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.
To those who have made donations, thank you.
To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.
The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.
While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.
After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.
If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.
We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.
Updated on Monday, October 7, 2019 at 1:18 PM CDT: Corrects reference to gender non-conforming.