Golden age of golf

Huge pool of talent makes 'next Tiger' a tough pick

Advertisement

Advertise with us

Two majors down, two left to be played in 2012. The instinct always is to make definitive statements about what happened and what's next. We'll only say this: After two majors, here is what we think we learned:

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 24/06/2012 (5170 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Two majors down, two left to be played in 2012. The instinct always is to make definitive statements about what happened and what’s next. We’ll only say this: After two majors, here is what we think we learned:

Picking a winner is a fool’s errand.

Fifteen majors, 15 different winners. The last nine majors have gone to first-time winners, including Webb Simpson’s come-from-behind triumph Sunday at the U.S. Open. There is so much depth around the world, so many talented players — a 17-year-old high schooler actually was alone in front midway through the second round at the Olympic Club, for crying out loud — oddsmakers must be losing their minds.

 

“I think the Tiger (Woods) effect of inspiring people to play at a younger age, and I think the access to golf has gotten so much bigger that the game is changing,” Simpson said after his victory. “I’m lucky because I feel like we’re playing at a time where golf is at its best.”

It’s dangerous to anoint someone, anyone, as the “next Tiger.” And that includes Tiger.

This is a lesson relearned. Maybe it will stick this time. Rory McIlroy blew away the field at the 2011 U.S. Open, setting a record for score in relation to par and winning by eight shots. So he must be the next Tiger, right? McIlroy, 23, most likely will win more majors; he’s that good. But 14 (and counting)? Tall order. And Woods himself, after victories in his major tune-ups (the Arnold Palmer Invitational, Memorial), was declared back. Then he tied for 40th in the Masters and tied for 21st in the U.S. Open. It might just be that THAT Tiger, from the first 12 years of his career, is gone for good.

Remember that “American drought” in majors? Forget it.

When McIlroy won the 2011 U.S. Open, one of the other storylines was a record streak of five majors in a row without an American winner. That streak stretched to six when Darren Clarke of Northern Ireland won the 2011 British Open, and the cacophony got louder, “What happened to American golf?” Now the streak is three in a row for the U.S.A., Keegan Bradley (2011 PGA), Bubba Watson (2012 Masters) and Simpson. Simpson and Bradley are 26, Watson is 33. And there are many others who will be contenders. The U.S. started the year with six players in the top 15; now there are nine. Even so, we won’t be asking, “What happened to European golf?”

The USGA really does not like it when the U.S. Open is in the red (numbers, that is).

Simpson’s winning score last Sunday was 1 over, quite a difference from the 2011 edition of the national championship. McIlroy finished 16 under par, and 20 players total were in red numbers after the final round. That 20 matched the combined total of players under par in the previous 12 U.S. Opens. The USGA couldn’t get Congressional the way it wanted to last year. The Olympic Club, and the weather, were “classic U.S. Open,” NBC’s Johnny Miller said.

 

— USA Today

Report Error Submit a Tip

Golf

LOAD GOLF ARTICLES