Ex-UConn player wins appeal over middle finger incident

Advertisement

Advertise with us

NEW YORK (AP) — A federal appeals court Wednesday reinstated the appeal of a former University of Connecticut women's soccer player who lost her scholarship after she gave the middle finger to a television camera as the Huskies celebrated winning a 2014 conference championship.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 30/11/2022 (1391 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

NEW YORK (AP) — A federal appeals court Wednesday reinstated the appeal of a former University of Connecticut women’s soccer player who lost her scholarship after she gave the middle finger to a television camera as the Huskies celebrated winning a 2014 conference championship.

A three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York City said Noriana Radwan presented sufficient evidence to go to trial on her claim that she was subjected to harsher punishment than male athletes who violated conduct rules.

The ruling overturns part of a 2020 decision by U.S. District Judge Victor Bolden in Connecticut and sends the case back to the federal trial court. The 2nd Circuit judges, however, upheld Bolden’s dismissal of Radwan’s First Amendment and due process claims.

UConn spokesperson Stephanie Reitz said school officials were disappointed with the decision but confident they will prevail in court.

“To be clear, the appeals court did not find that the plaintiff was treated more harshly than her male peers,” Reitz said in a statement. “The court simply found that she presented sufficient evidence to withstand summary judgment.”

Radwan did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment. Her lawyer, Greg Tarone, said he would comment on the ruling after he reviewed it, but that he was pleased the case is being returned to the trial court.

The Connecticut attorney general’s office, which represented UConn in the appeal, said it was reviewing the ruling to determine its next move.

Radwan raised her middle finger to an ESPNU camera while celebrating with teammates after the Huskies beat South Florida 3-2 on penalty kicks in the 2014 American Athletic Conference championship game.

Coach Len Tsantiris initially suspended Radwan from the 2014 NCAA Tournament and issued a statement apologizing to the conference, South Florida and those who watched the game on television. Tsantiris retired after the 2017 season.

In her lawsuit, Radwan alleged that after the publicity died down, she was stripped of her scholarship midway through the school year without due process for what the coach described as “serious misconduct.” She eventually transferred to Hofstra.

Greg Tarone, her attorney, argued that although Radwan’s offense was regrettable, it was protected speech that did not rise to the level of “serious misconduct.” He also argued that the punishment was much harsher than what male athletes at the school had received for more serious offenses, including arrests.

Report Error Submit a Tip

Soccer

LOAD SOCCER ARTICLES