English FA unhappy with panel’s verdict on banned coach
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Digital Subscription
One year of digital access for only $205*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 18/01/2023 (1354 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
LONDON (AP) — English soccer’s governing body criticized Wednesday the findings of an independent panel which concluded that a lower-league coach banned for 15 months for using discriminatory language toward his players was “not a conscious racist.”
John Yems, the former manager of fourth-tier Crawley Town, admitted to one charge and was found guilty of 11 others relating to comments made from 2019-22 that referenced ethnic origin, color, race, nationality, religion, belief or gender.
Among the evidence heard by the independent disciplinary commission set up by the English Football Association, Yems was found to have used Islamophobic language, as well as racial slurs and stereotypes toward black players.
The panel said that what it described as the 63-year-old Yems’ “banter” had “undoubtedly came across to the victims and others as offensive, racist and Islamophobic.” Yems, the panel said, had “no appreciation that much of the sort of language which might have been in common usage some 40 or 50 years ago has no place in modern society.”
Yet, it sided with Yems’ lawyers, who argued he was not a racist and neither did he “ever intend to make racist remarks.”
In response, the FA — which brought a total of 16 charges of discrimination against Yems — said it “fundamentally disagreed” with the panel’s findings and reiterated its push for a longer ban.
A number of Crawley players took grievances about Yems to the Professional Footballers’ Association, sparking an investigation and leading to Yem’s suspension for 12 days before he was fired in May.
Anti-discrimination campaigner Kick It Out said Yems’ language had been “simply shocking.”
“The behavior outlined in the report must be called out for exactly what it is, racism and Islamophobia,” a Kick It Out statement read.
“To speak plainly, a 15-month ban given the severity of the 11 proven charges is a slap in the face to the victims of the discriminatory abuse detailed in this report and anyone who has been subject to racism or Islamophobia.”
Kick It Out said the findings set a dangerous precedent “by allowing perpetrators to hide behind a ‘banter’ defense when intentionally using harmful and discriminatory language.”
___
More AP soccer: https://apnews.com/hub/soccer and https://twitter.com/AP_Sports